Beth
12-09-2004, 01:34 PM
I was looking at a past issue of Nat Geo that dealt with us fat Merkins. Yes, it was sadly true that we gorge ourselves on food and are probably much more gluttonous than we were thirty years ago, although I cannot recollect that time.
Anyhoo, I looked once again at a BMI chart. I realize that 19-24 is a healthy weight, 25-29 is overweight, 30-34 is obese, and 35+ is moderately to morbidly obese. Okay. Here is the thing. I know my weight and BMI since I am weight obsessed and cannot seem to lose one freaking pound but I asked hubby about his weight once again because I was stunned what the chart said. According to his weight and height (6'2" and 225lbs), his BMI is right around 29. Now, this has my dear hubby in the overweight category and nearly at the obese mark. Hubby is trim, muscular and only has a wee wittle pudge on his tummy. He is large, but the bulk is most definitely muchly caused by muscle.
I, on the other hand, have a BMI of 22. I am in the normal weight category, but I consider myself downright chunky. I do not have the muscles hubby does, although I am very strong for a poor female;).
Now, the BMI has hubby in a danger category, though trim and not too much fat on his body, but me in the healthy category although I do have tons more fat on my body and this just seems so very off and makes me really question how valid the whole Body Mass Index scale is.
Should we really use this scale to determine who is and is not overweight and to determine obesity? because if Americans like hubby, are being used to determine who is and is not obese (if he works out and bulks up another five pounds, he is considered obese) then I really cannot see that the claim that we are so freaking fat is really that accurate.
Anyhoo, I looked once again at a BMI chart. I realize that 19-24 is a healthy weight, 25-29 is overweight, 30-34 is obese, and 35+ is moderately to morbidly obese. Okay. Here is the thing. I know my weight and BMI since I am weight obsessed and cannot seem to lose one freaking pound but I asked hubby about his weight once again because I was stunned what the chart said. According to his weight and height (6'2" and 225lbs), his BMI is right around 29. Now, this has my dear hubby in the overweight category and nearly at the obese mark. Hubby is trim, muscular and only has a wee wittle pudge on his tummy. He is large, but the bulk is most definitely muchly caused by muscle.
I, on the other hand, have a BMI of 22. I am in the normal weight category, but I consider myself downright chunky. I do not have the muscles hubby does, although I am very strong for a poor female;).
Now, the BMI has hubby in a danger category, though trim and not too much fat on his body, but me in the healthy category although I do have tons more fat on my body and this just seems so very off and makes me really question how valid the whole Body Mass Index scale is.
Should we really use this scale to determine who is and is not overweight and to determine obesity? because if Americans like hubby, are being used to determine who is and is not obese (if he works out and bulks up another five pounds, he is considered obese) then I really cannot see that the claim that we are so freaking fat is really that accurate.