PDA

View Full Version : Joshua A. Norton, Emperor of the USA


Farren
03-08-2008, 04:19 PM
I just finished reading a Sandman comic about Joshua A. Norton, self-styled emperor, and found the story quite fascinating, so I've been reading some more about him on the Intertron. Just thought I'd share for anyone who hasn't heard about this fascinating character:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_A._Norton


When Norton returned to San Francisco from his self-imposed exile, he had become completely disgruntled with what he considered the vicissitudes and inadequacies of the legal and political structures of the United States. On September 17, 1859, he took matters into his own hands and distributed letters to the various newspapers in the city, proclaiming himself "Emperor of these United States":
“ At the peremptory request and desire of a large majority of the citizens of these United States, I, Joshua Norton, formerly of Algoa Bay, Cape of Good Hope, and now for the last 9 years and 10 months past of S. F., Cal., declare and proclaim myself Emperor of these U. S.; and in virtue of the authority thereby in me vested, do hereby order and direct the representatives of the different States of the Union to assemble in Musical Hall, of this city, on the 1st day of Feb. next, then and there to make such alterations in the existing laws of the Union as may ameliorate the evils under which the country is laboring, and thereby cause confidence to exist, both at home and abroad, in our stability and integrity.


NORTON I, Emperor of the United States.[12][16]


Norton would later add "Protector of Mexico" to this title. Thus commenced his unprecedented and whimsical twenty-one-year "reign" over America.

...

Norton's orders obviously had no effect on the army, and the Congress likewise continued in its activities unperturbed. Norton issued further decrees in 1860 that purported to dissolve the republic and to forbid the assembly of any members of the Congress.[18] Norton's battle against the elected leaders of America was to persist throughout what he considered his reign, though it appears that Norton eventually, if somewhat grudgingly, accepted that Congress would continue to exist without his permission, although this did not change his feelings on the matter. In the hopes of resolving the many disputes between citizens of the United States during the Civil War, Norton issued a mandate in 1862 ordering both the Protestant and Roman Catholic Church churches to publicly ordain him as Emperor.[12]

His attempts to overthrow the elected government of America by force having been utterly ignored, Norton turned his attention and his proclamations to other matters, both political and social. On August 12, 1869, "being desirous of allaying the dissensions of party strife now existing within our realm", he abolished both the Democratic and Republican parties.[4] The failure to refer to Norton's adopted home city with appropriate respect was the subject of a particularly stern edict in 1872:

“ Whoever after due and proper warning shall be heard to utter the abominable word "Frisco", which has no linguistic or other warrant, shall be deemed guilty of a High Misdemeanor, and shall pay into the Imperial Treasury as penalty the sum of twenty-five dollars.[20] ”

...

Norton spent his days as emperor inspecting the streets of San Francisco in an elaborate blue uniform with tarnished gold-plated epaulets, given to him by officers of the United States Army post at the Presidio of San Francisco. He also wore a beaver hat decorated with a peacock feather and a rosette.[26] He frequently enhanced this regal posture with a cane or an umbrella. During his inspections, Norton would examine the condition of the sidewalks and cable cars, the state of repair of public property, and the appearance of police officers.[27] Norton would also frequently give lengthy philosophical expositions on a variety of topics to anyone within earshot at the time.

...

Norton's funeral was a solemn, mournful and large affair. Respects were paid "...by all classes from capitalists to the pauper, the clergyman to the pickpocket, well-dressed ladies and those whose garb and bearing hinted of the social outcast."[11] Some accounts report that as many as 30,000 people lined the streets to pay homage, and that the funeral cortege was two miles (3 km) long. He was buried at the Masonic Cemetery, at the expense of the City of San Francisco.[9]

In 1934, Norton's remains were transferred, as were all graves in the city, at the expense of the City of San Francisco to a grave site of moderate splendor at Woodlawn Cemetery, in Colma. The site is marked by a small worn stone marked with "Norton I, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico".[36]

Dingfod
03-08-2008, 04:58 PM
I knew a welder in Wyoming who used to have "Emperor of these United States and Protector of Mexico" on his business cards. I always thought it a funny thing, now I know where it came from.

Watser?
03-08-2008, 05:05 PM
I heard about him in the French comic strip Lucky Luke ('the man who is faster than his own shadow'). There is an episode called Emperor Smith, based on him.

Very popular comic here, Lucky Luke.

Ymir's blood
03-08-2008, 06:17 PM
Certainly an interesting character. I knew about him before Sandman, mostly because he tends to show up in period fiction. In that, he's sort of like Mark Twain, writers use him to give color to the story. For instance, if time travelers end up in 19th Century America, they are almost certain to encounter Twain, Norton or a pre-presidential Abraham Lincoln.

Norton is an interesting character in his own right. Certainly his story highlights a difference between his time and ours. Eccentrics today are only notable if they're otherwise celebrities. If not, then they tend to get stigmatized as being mentally ill. San Francisco was a pretty big city even back then, so it's not as if he was a small town character that everyone knew.

California Tanker
03-09-2008, 06:19 AM
I've not read a Lucky Luke comic in years.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/02-Norton.jpg/468px-02-Norton.jpg

Some captions posted on the 'caption competition thread'

There's a group of people (Generally bikers) who make an annual visit to drink by his grave on the anniversary of his death. He's still got a bit of a following, the gravestone in the picture was bought after a collection to replace the old one which got damaged.

I've done more than a few funerals at that cemetery, I get a lot of the backstory!

NTM

Doctor X
03-09-2008, 05:09 PM
He was British-born, so it was the only way he could gain executive power in the United States. . . .

--J.D.

Freddy
03-10-2008, 01:32 AM
He was British-born, so it was the only way he could gain executive power in the United States. . . .

--J.D.

Did Norton ever become a US citizen?

Doctor X
03-10-2008, 02:55 AM
Actually, that I do not know; will have to search a bit.

--J.D.

Doctor X
03-10-2008, 03:14 AM
This (http://www.notfrisco.com/colmatales/norton/norton2.html) is an interesting debunking of some of the myths regarding Emperor Norton--you can also see where Gaiman found the "King of Pain."

This (Unlike all of our Presidents, Joshua Norton was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. Born in England in 1819, he migrated with his parents to south Africa where he spent his youth. It was not until 1849, as a young man of 30, that he immigrated to his future capital-San Francisco.

) repeats one of the claimed myths from above, but gives this information:

Unlike all of our Presidents, Joshua Norton was not a natural-born citizen of the United States. Born in England in 1819, he migrated with his parents to south Africa where he spent his youth. It was not until 1849, as a young man of 30, that he immigrated to his future capital-San Francisco.

I have found no information that he ever obtained citizenship in the United States.

--J.D.

Dingfod
03-10-2008, 04:54 PM
He didn't need to become a citizen, he was Emperor.

Doctor X
03-10-2008, 11:00 PM
Indeed!

Citizen, let this be a lesson for you! Democracy is not for the people!

--Judge Dredd

Ermintrude
03-12-2008, 03:29 AM
The article on him shows even that far back a reluctance to tolerate eccentricity that Americans don't like to admit. Nutcases like that were two a penny in Britain and Ireland and are not wholly gone now. Some of them were more than nutcases because they actually did have inherited money and land and obscure hereditory links that might show them entitled to be King of Something or other. Emperors don't inherit, they just are by public acclamation.

I guess there's a lot in common with some evangelists. The man might have found himself trapped in a role that he started 'innocently'. But even then the USA was a big open place full of people moving about and he could have moved to another city, even in California. I know not to take anything Gore Vidal writes in any kind of literal sense, but I find a lot in common with his depiction of Aaron Burr.

Who knows how this kind of rational insanity with only one feature abnormal works? 'Emperor' wasn't quite as weird then either, Mexico had an Emperor, France had had one and soon had another. In the last 30 years an African dictator declared himself Emperor Bokassa with support from the French president. And gods help us, was Reagan and his Bush successors any less of an 'Emperor'?

Doctor X
03-12-2008, 09:48 AM
Yes, they never tried to get their wives elected.









I win.

--J.D.

Caligulette
03-25-2008, 08:11 PM
I've known about him for some time, having been raised in the Bay Area.

We had a guy playing him at one of the (short lived) California Faires (related to the Renaissance Faire people)- he would often fight with "General Viejo". He would grant us various properties. I "owned" Nob Hill for a weekend.

He is, I must say, my favourite Emperor.