PDA

View Full Version : Nominate your favorite "...and Violence" smilies!!


Crumb
04-14-2005, 03:53 AM
Apparently there are a lot more ways to be violent than there are ways to have sex. We need to nominate those smilies from the violence category that should have a shot at the championship. There are a lot of cute ones, a lot of mean ones, and certainly a lot of useful ones in this category. Choose wisely and carefully. You get three picks, two will get a smiley in the running. My the best violent little round bastard win!

viscousmemories
04-14-2005, 04:27 AM
:deadhorse:

:sqattack:

:spank:

Skep
04-14-2005, 04:29 AM
:wedgie:

:beathead:

:balls3:

Crumb
04-14-2005, 04:43 AM
:chucks:

:sling:

:abitmuch:

livius drusus
04-14-2005, 02:31 PM
The problem is there are so many really hideous sex smilies out there. I mean, a smiley with a cock spooging on another smiley just seems so deeply wrong to me. It's like child porn or Down's Syndrome porn or something: cruel and wanton and just plain wrong.

Now smilies eviscerating other smilies, otoh, are good clean fun. (I actually had only one or two violent ones uploaded originally until bey starting baying about needing more. See? I do have delicate sensibilites. I'm just a total pushover, is all.)

Having said that, there's no way I can only nominate three in this category. I'll second vm's :spank:, and add

:catfight:

:3dkick:

Edited to note that I've gone ahead and reduced my five to three because Crumb is a meanie. :deepsigh:

godfry n. glad
04-14-2005, 03:41 PM
This li'l 'mater dodging smilie is my fave in this category. I use it when I know I've put my foot in my mouth and have it comin'. (The key word there is "know"...usually I'm oblivious.)

:heckled:

This is another classic from that adorable bickering couple....perhaps we should call them warn and inland

:hit:

Now, this one I've rarely seen used at all, but it needs more exposure. Let it out! Better out than in, is what I've always been told.

:fart:


Can you tell I don't really go for the blood, guts and gore stuff?

wei yau
04-14-2005, 04:41 PM
I'm torn. On the one hand, my first choices would have simply been seconding liv's choices. On the othe hand, I love the cinematic-style of these guys.

:shutup:

:dieclown:

:bombed:

I decided to nominate these, as they are so rarely used. They probably won't get seconded, but they deserve a mention. I just hope that my decision doesn't adversely affect liv's choices.

(Can anyone guess who's my favorite smiley-artiste?)

Dingfod
04-14-2005, 04:42 PM
I nominate none of the above and none of the below.

Crumb
04-14-2005, 05:08 PM
Um liv, you need to eliminate two of those. You're only allowed three. If you must nominate five, at least find a stooge to pawn them off on (like maybe worn), and that way you can at have him second one of yours too and guarantee it gets in.

godfry n. glad
04-14-2005, 05:15 PM
Um liv, you need to eliminate two of those. You're only allowed three. If you must nominate five, at least find a stooge to pawn them off on (like maybe worn), and that way you can at have him second one of yours too and guarantee it gets in.

Hey... Crumbum...

Can we nominate our three and then second others?

godfry

Crumb
04-14-2005, 05:17 PM
Can we nominate our three and then second others?

Well it was my intent to limit everyone to three. This is lined up to be a big field, but I only have 10 spots in the poll. If I don't get ten smilies then maybe I will allow more, but lets stick to three to get started.

livius drusus
04-14-2005, 05:23 PM
Sure, I could narrow it down to three, but why think small when I could far more easily increase the number of poll options allowed. :heybabeh:

godfry n. glad
04-14-2005, 05:26 PM
Can we nominate our three and then second others?

Well it was my intent to limit everyone to three. This is lined up to be a big field, but I only have 10 spots in the poll. If I don't get ten smilies then maybe I will allow more, but lets stick to three to get started.

Oh, I understand and all... It's just that with such a huge collection, you could get a lot of "just nominations" from the torpid crowd 'round these parts and an insufficient number of second nominations that would qualify as "seconds" to get them in the running.

As it is, you have how many nominations and not a single smiley as made it into the running. That's a pretty good built-in limitation factor, I'd say.

I will live with your ruling...O Crumb-master.

godfry

Oh... thanks for quashing that presumptuous move on the part of Ms. Bigwig. Just because she could crush us like the insignificant insects we are doesn't mean she should be able to nominate two more smilies than every other schmoe on the board. :whup:

wei yau
04-14-2005, 05:28 PM
Sure, I could narrow it down to three, but why think small when I could far more easily increase the number of poll options allowed. :heybabeh:

:cricket:

(sorry, ceptimus, I know I totally stole your bag)

Dingfod
04-14-2005, 05:29 PM
Someone else can have my three.

Crumb
04-14-2005, 05:30 PM
Sure, I could narrow it down to three, but why think small when I could far more easily increase the number of poll options allowed.

Bribery could be quite effective.

Oh... thanks for quashing that presumptuous move on the part of Ms. Bigwig. Just because she could crush us like the insignificant insects we are doesn't mean she should be able to nominate two more smilies than every other schmoe on the board.

uhhh....thanks godfry...

livius drusus
04-14-2005, 05:34 PM
But... But... The TV told me that ownership has its privileges. Oh wait. That was membership. Poop. :kickscan:

godfry n. glad
04-14-2005, 05:38 PM
That was one of those, "But WAIT! There's MORE!" ads, wasn't it?

Crumb
04-15-2005, 01:52 AM
I need more nominations folks!

livius drusus
04-15-2005, 01:56 AM
Oo! Let me! Let me!

Crumb
04-15-2005, 01:59 AM
:glare:

livius drusus
04-15-2005, 02:06 AM
:sadcheer:

Gurdur
04-15-2005, 02:16 AM
I need more nominations folks!
I hereby nominate Crumb.

Crumb
04-15-2005, 02:16 AM
:pat:

ceptimus
04-15-2005, 10:22 AM
:deadhorse:

:sqattack:

:wedgie:

godfry n. glad
04-15-2005, 04:18 PM
Someone else can have my three.

Okay.

Hey, everybody....

warrenly nominates the same three smilies that godfry did. Ergo, all three are now qualified.

(how's that, worn?)

Shake
04-15-2005, 05:31 PM
:explode2:

:balls3:

:beathead:

CARLA
04-16-2005, 03:57 AM
:behead: :twoguns: :slice: :guns: :voodoo: :deadhorse2: :abitmuch: :electro: I LIKE ALL OF THESE.. :bow:

livius drusus
04-16-2005, 03:58 AM
Uh oh... :tiptoe:

Crumb
04-16-2005, 04:26 AM
CARLA, pick three please. :twitch:

CARLA
04-16-2005, 06:02 AM
:deadhorse2: :abitmuch: :electro: OK here are my there picks.. :wink:

Crumb
04-16-2005, 06:16 AM
Thank you CARLA :)

godfry n. glad
04-16-2005, 02:43 PM
can anyone tell me why that smiley is clubbing that dead horse in the nuts?

livius drusus
04-16-2005, 02:57 PM
That smiley is clearly clubbing that dead horse in the hauch. Sheesh... Everybody's a damn critic. :hmph:

godfry n. glad
04-16-2005, 03:01 PM
:woopsie:

Crumb
04-17-2005, 04:34 AM
Well if I allow Warrenly's "nominations" there are exactly ten that have been seconded. But many have been nominated. If liv will give me more than ten slots, I will give everyone two more nominations. What do you say liv?

livius drusus
04-17-2005, 04:46 AM
Sure thing, chicken wing. How many do you want?

Crumb
04-17-2005, 04:51 AM
:friedchicken: How many will you give me?

Is twenty too much to ask for?

livius drusus
04-17-2005, 04:55 AM
I think that would split the vote a little too much, don't you? How about 15?

Crumb
04-17-2005, 05:01 AM
Sounds good. You are a shrewd negotiator. But I allow multiple choices anyway so I don't know if that would be much of a problem.

livius drusus
04-17-2005, 05:04 AM
This is true, but even multiple choice must know its audience. I've enabled 15. Now I can renominate my beloved :balls: and :draw:.


:pleased:

Crumb
04-17-2005, 05:05 AM
Good, now everyone's happy!

Skep
04-17-2005, 05:06 AM
Okay. With my two extra nominations, I second :sling: and :electro:

Corona688
04-17-2005, 05:15 AM
:sqattack:
:sqattack:
:sqattack:

Crumb
04-17-2005, 05:18 AM
That one is already in, C688. :wink:

Crumb
04-17-2005, 06:54 PM
:explode2: :deadhorse2:


And we have room for one more. Anyone?

viscousmemories
04-17-2005, 06:59 PM
:slice:

(although it hasn't been nominated yet, so i'm not sure if it counts.)

Crumb
04-17-2005, 07:11 PM
Needs to be seconded.

livius drusus
04-17-2005, 07:16 PM
Carla nominated that guy before you shot her down. Doesn't that count?

Crumb
04-17-2005, 07:18 PM
Sounds good. Nominations are done. I'm off to make a poll. :)