Obligatory Smilie Abuse

[Corona688]

I wouldn't be a newbie if I didn't abuse the smilies, would I? Hi. OK I'm done.

Glad to be here. some of you might recognize me from IIDB.

[viscousmemories]

I recognize you. I mention it here (http://www.freethought-forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=347). :D

Welcome again, Corona. I love how you abused those smilies. :banana:

[livius drusus]

Wow. It's not every newbie who dives straight into the sign code. I'd welcome you, but I hate to be redundant. :wink:

[Corona688]

Wow. It's not every newbie who dives straight into the sign code. I'd welcome you, but I hate to be redundant. :wink: About the sign code... if you quote my post you'll notice the signs appear in opposite order from the way they're listed. The farthest-out sign is the deepest-nested tag. It's not too important, but I wonder why.

[viscousmemories]

About the sign code... if you quote my post you'll notice the signs appear in opposite order from the way they're listed. The farthest-out sign is the deepest-nested tag. It's not too important, but I wonder why.
Very strange. It works counter to the way the quote tags work... :?

[Chiron]

Let us* do a li'l bit o' testing.
Outermost top (crowd).
Second-outermost top (santa).
Second-innermost top (cool).
Innermost top and bottom (grin).
Second-innermost bottom (cool).
Second-outermost bottom (santa).
Outermost bottom (crowd).
Indeed, the reverse is what we have here, even with an even number of signs. That's sorta weird.
*me

[JoeP]

Bug! Go and report it!