Theory of Universal Self-Creation

[Philosophy]

Jonathan was comtemplating whether his experiment would succeed. It seemed the he had to check his probability and improbability maths several times, then his quantum mechanics to make sure all the atoms in the whole universe would not be blocking time and space. He checked the engine. Everything was accurate. Jonathan was very pleased with his work and now going to make the journey.

And Jonathan went back to time, in search for God...

It was now the Universal Year 0. He stared into the complete vacuum around him and was astonished. "Where the hell is God?"--mumbled Jonathan--"So...for thousands of years all Abrahamic religions were total bullshit?". Enraged, Jonathan thought to himself "Ok, then I will be God myself!".

The lab materials were in front of him. He just had to create an explosion enormous enough to shrink the whole universe for a fraction of a second and then expand it infinitely. The matters he brought from his modern days become the primitive simplest proto-matters and pre-matters of the universe.

Thus on the first day of the Universal Creation, proto-matters and pre-matters were formed.

On the second day, Jonathan was not pleased. He was having trouble figuring out the exact prime number he had to equate in order to create proto-light from a bunch of the so-called modern day matters. He forgot to bring with him spontaneous light, so he could not create spontaneous radioactive sources.

Thus on the second day of the Universal Creation, proto-non-spontaneous light was formed. This type of light came from sources, such as the Sun, and, therefore, could not radiate from nowhere.

Quick notes: (since the author has to go write other lectures, he cannot spend an hour writing and editing this tedious story)

Third day--Creation of Planets, Macrosopic World, and Laws of Physics

Fourth day--Creation of the Microscopic World and Quantum Non-Laws

Fifth day--Creation of the "Bio", i.e. intelligent beings

Sixth day--Creation of the "Superficial Artificial Intelligence (SAI)". This is why intelligent beings can "function". Of course Jonathan himself possessed this SAI because his parents possessed it and his grandparents possessed it and his great-grand parents possessed it and his great great-grandparents possessed it and his great great great grandparents possessed it and the first monkey possessed it and the first bacterium possessed it and the first being possessed it.

Seventh day--Jonathan thought that he must create Dr. Philosophy, for without Dr. Philosophy, D.Phil, D.Litt., who would write this story out for the posterity? Thus Dr. Philosophy was born. First words from Dr. Philosophy for God "Why the hell did you bring me here? I was having fun being in the realm of non-existence! Screw you stupid Jon!"
"What the hell? So all existence are brought directly from the realm of non-existence?"
"Yeah! Shame on you for being an idiotic physicist! You have not even read On Non-Being and Non-Time by me!"
...and they were having an argument on what the hell non-existence actually was...

The End. :yup:

[Veritas]

And then they woke up and discovered it had all been a wonderful dream!

[Philosophy]

And then they woke up and discovered it had all been a wonderful dream!

oh thank you very much for ruining the thread.

[Veritas]

My pleasure.:)

[Prodegy]

fascinating...

[Prodegy]

so what was on the 8th day? (srry for the double post)

[Philosophy]

so what was on the 8th day? (srry for the double post)

There isn't any 8th day because on the 7th day Jonathan (modelled upon you :giggle:) the God-Scientist creats Dr. Philosophy, D.Phil., D.Litt., and from that point forward has been infinitely and indeterminitely having an eternal argument about the existence of non-existence (whoops, gotta read On Non-Being and Non-Time which should be published soon in 20-30 years!). This explains why Jonathan the God-Scientist has never manipulated anyone's life. Hence, one has free will.

[davidm]

Where do I fit into this picture? :glare:

[Philosophy]

Where do I fit into this picture? :glare:

You're already in the play! :yup:

Ok...Where do you fit in? You probably fit in the electron section. :atom:

:giggle:

[Philosophy]

Ok the story Dr. Philosophy just wrote is one of the worst and most tedious stories he has ever written and you have ever read. He, without any talent for writing, should cease writing lectures and books because his lectures and books emit a very awful sensational signals to the mind of the audience. :doh:

[davidm]

Ok the story Dr. Philosophy just wrote is one of the worst and most tedious stories he has ever written and you have ever read. He, without any talent for writing, should cease writing lectures and books because his lectures and books emit a very awful sensational signals to the mind of the audience. :doh:

Practice makes perfect. :yup:

Also, the Evil Eye play was coming along quite well, IMO. :popcorn:

[Philosophy]

Ok the story Dr. Philosophy just wrote is one of the worst and most tedious stories he has ever written and you have ever read. He, without any talent for writing, should cease writing lectures and books because his lectures and books emit a very awful sensational signals to the mind of the audience. :doh:

Practice makes perfect. :yup:

Also, the Evil Eye play was coming along quite well, IMO. :popcorn:

Nope, not in my case because I have been writing for years and my writing, to tell the truth, SUCKS MAJORLY! Look at how tedious it all is! Is it because I chatter that it is tedious or is it because Raskolnikov is haunting me!

Ok, to be serious, re-read the previous posts and see how boring the whole thing is. :doh: *sigh* Recall the selected lectures on political and ethical philosophy are boring as hell. :doh:

L'homme de lettre, do you have any suggestion for better fictional, non-fictional, and professorial writing? :doh:

[davidm]

Ok the story Dr. Philosophy just wrote is one of the worst and most tedious stories he has ever written and you have ever read. He, without any talent for writing, should cease writing lectures and books because his lectures and books emit a very awful sensational signals to the mind of the audience. :doh:

Practice makes perfect. :yup:

Also, the Evil Eye play was coming along quite well, IMO. :popcorn:

Nope, not in my case because I have been writing for years and my writing, to tell the truth, SUCKS MAJORLY! Look at how tedious it all is! Is it because I chatter that it is tedious or is it because Raskolnikov is haunting me!

It's because Raskolnikov is haunting you. :D

Ok, to be serious, re-read the previous posts and see how boring the whole thing is. :doh: *sigh* Recall the selected lectures on political and ethical philosophy are boring as hell. :doh:

L'homme de lettre, do you have any suggestion for better fictional, non-fictional, and professorial writing? :doh:

Well, seriously, I liked the way your play was coming, and you're being too hard on yourself. The way to write well is to keep writing. You're much too young to make sweeping and definitive judgments about your work.

[Philosophy]

Ok the story Dr. Philosophy just wrote is one of the worst and most tedious stories he has ever written and you have ever read. He, without any talent for writing, should cease writing lectures and books because his lectures and books emit a very awful sensational signals to the mind of the audience. :doh:

Practice makes perfect. :yup:

Also, the Evil Eye play was coming along quite well, IMO. :popcorn:

Nope, not in my case because I have been writing for years and my writing, to tell the truth, SUCKS MAJORLY! Look at how tedious it all is! Is it because I chatter that it is tedious or is it because Raskolnikov is haunting me!

It's because Raskolnikov is haunting you. :D

Ok, to be serious, re-read the previous posts and see how boring the whole thing is. :doh: *sigh* Recall the selected lectures on political and ethical philosophy are boring as hell. :doh:

L'homme de lettre, do you have any suggestion for better fictional, non-fictional, and professorial writing? :doh:

Well, seriously, I liked the way your play was coming, and you're being too hard on yourself. The way to write well is to keep writing. You're much too young to make sweeping and definitive judgments about your work.

Raskolnikov: "It is in the nature of the murderer that he worries about the quality of his murder."

Dr. Philosophy: "Oh yeah? So it's the nature of Dr. Philosophy that he worries about the quality of his writing!"

Raskolnikov: "Perhaps..."

:P

Ok, davidm, the play is going to be completed soon. Don't laugh at the poor quality though :blush: , i'm writing it all for *you* :yup:

Raskolnikov: "Just a glass of beer, a piece of dry bread--and in one moment the brain is stronger, the mind is clearer and the will is firm! Phew, how utterly petty it all is"

Dr. Philosophy: "Ok, so just some 8 hours of sleep and Dr. Philosophy will write better tomorrow!"

I've been working too hard this week. Now it's sleep time! :yup: Nighty night, dave.

[davidm]

G'night! :wave:

[Adora]

I don't think I've snorted enough crack to get the point of this thread. How the fuck can you measure time and days if there's no matter? How can "macroscopic" things exist without the "microscopic" things to build on? How can powers that transcend both be created on one day without the other thing being created as well?

Jonathan is a fuckwit who can't even build a 'verse properly. Who was the bigger fuckwit who put him in charge?

[Philosophy]

I don't think I've snorted enough crack to get the point of this thread. How the fuck can you measure time and days if there's no matter? How can "macroscopic" things exist without the "microscopic" things to build on? How can powers that transcend both be created on one day without the other thing being created as well?

That's because the macroscopic world provides the frame. :yup:

[Adora]

That's because the macroscopic world provides the frame. :yup:
Um... no. Maybe you need to use a dictionary sometime before you start using words with more than 2 syllables.

[Philosophy]

A frame is different from a foundation...For example, you frame a house before building the interior of it. This is the kind of sense in which the word "frame" is used. Learn context and application of rhetoric, Adora... :glare:

[Adora]

A frame is different from a foundation...For example, you frame a house before building the interior of it. This is the kind of sense in which the word "frame" is used. Learn context and application of rhetoric, Adora...
Yeah, and maybe get your metaphors right before abusing them. Guess what genius? You can't build the frame of a house and expect it to stand up without a foundation. You need the microscopic foundation before the macroscopic frame. You don't build a human starting with the fully-grown framework and working from the outside in. You get the basic building blocks and expand from there.

Microscopic before macroscopic, my friend.

[Ohm]

A frame is different from a foundation...For example, you frame a house before building the interior of it. This is the kind of sense in which the word "frame" is used. Learn context and application of rhetoric, Adora...
Yeah, and maybe get your metaphors right before abusing them. Guess what genius? You can't build the frame of a house and expect it to stand up without a foundation. You need the microscopic foundation before the macroscopic frame. You don't build a human starting with the fully-grown framework and working from the outside in. You get the basic building blocks and expand from there.

Microscopic before macroscopic, my friend.

i will have to agree with this one, i would think micros may build on top of one another making Macros (when it comes to atoms)