Fucking education! How does it work?
Okay, the meme still works for me, so deal haters.
Anyhoo, this topic came up in this thread about world sailing kids, then again yesterday in chat when Adam started a war with me by saying school was more important than sailing for Laura Dekker specifically (but he means for everyone always probably :glare:). Also, this comes up a lot when homeschooling is discussed or banned (as it has been in both Sweden and Germany). Quote:
Some percentage of people seem to feel there some objective and easily identified "proper" education. Why? Who's to say that the scope and sequence found in X schools is better for any individual than some other type of education, like, say the things one can learn while sailing the world, or traveling in general, or through self led study as in unschooling? Where's the evidence that one type of education is superior to another, and how is superiority determined? What subjects are the most important for every kid to know? Why? |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
NOTE: This is a U.S. specific response:
Quote:
We're not able to articulate what a high school graduate should know, how can we possibly say that one institution of learning is more effective than another? What does a successfully executed secondary education look like? |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
Edit: My point being that people, children and adults, appear to be able to learn all kinds of important knowledge and skills outside of the :openquote:traditional:closequote: school environment, so what's to say they couldn't learn everything they need to learn that way (and avoid wasting time on stuff that they don't want or need). |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Since I was mentioned by name...(and I tried to fight a war with you yesterday, but you logged out to do some werk or something, Meanie Shae! I put my dukes up and everything!)
Quote:
I don't have any particularly strong views on whether or not private schooling or homeschooling should be allowed or disallowed, provided those forms of schooling cover the baseline curriculum. I'm leery of unschooling because I don't see how there's a mechanism for assuring that a student will get a baseline education consistent with what everyone else is getting. In the specific context of the sailing girl, I was mostly reacting to the notion that thinking that a sailing trip is not an acceptable excuse for missing out on part of that curriculum is some kind of overrestrictive European nanny-state thing. |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
Quote:
Sure it would be great if there was a baseline education that was worthwhile (english, math, civics, whatever I don't know or care, I think that's Waluigi's point at least in the bit you quoted ... "we" as a society haven't agreed upon anything so far), but in the US at least, the baseline is total crap. Maybe it is better in Europe. :shrug: Quote:
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
And sorry we couldn't have our battle Tweedle Dum, I did get stuck doing stupid work Quote:
In coming up with a long term plan (totally flexible of course) I figured out that the baseline (in the US) is as follows: Reading/Language arts (grammar, spelling, writing, literature, etc) Mathematics Social Studies (incl. history, geography, politics, government) Science But to what extent should each of these be taught? |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
I'm with LS on this one.
I'm not convinced that any kind of baseline is absolutely required. I can't imagine any type of homeschooling would be so deficient as to be a concern for society at large. Besides, once all the illegal immigrant labor leaves, we're gonna need the homeschooled to sell water at on-ramps, hold up signs for furniture sales and mow my lawn. |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Oh, also, I disagree that schools as they are now provide any specific baseline that every single student needs to have. I think everybody needs to know how to read and count, but a lot of kids already learn that before going into kindergarten.
Beyond that, I think some kids need Calculus and other kids need 17th Century French Literature, but I bet there are very few kids that will end up having a use for both in their adult life. I recommend offering all of them so the student will have a chance to challenge themselves and see what they are interested in or good at. But when the kid reaches that age where they know they just plain aren't into math, it's just cruel to force them to take year after year of algebra, geometry, etc. If they're not good at it, they're not going to go into a field that requires it, and vice versa. In the meantime it just causes fights and bad grades and feelings of failure. |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
I came up with my baseline list looking at what most colleges require for undergrads. In general they aren't that specific re: what level of math or science, or what specific concepts of language arts, or the scope and sequence of history.
I did very well on the ACT without calculus or physics, and with my 4th English credit being for yearbook. Also, not every kid wants to go to college, so does someone wanting to be a tradesman need to study Shakespeare? |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
I think there ought to be an implied "by appropriate experts" somewhere in my first post. Obviously, the Texas Board of Education is in the thrall of ignorant reactionaries right now, but I don't think that counts as an argument against having educational standards any more than the fact that many homeschoolers are ignorant fundamentalists counts as an argument against homeschooling.
To me, it's mostly a basic issue of equality. For every Shea out there, there's an ignorant and incurious parent who, absent a mandated standard, would not see to it that there children were properly educated, or a wildeyed nutjob who goes to great lengths to see to it that their kids learn all about the importance of the gold standard and the insidious way the War of Northern Aggression forced the peace loving South into tax-slavery to their northern cousins. I think their childrens' interests are served by mandating some minimum standard of education that must be provided. If that means that someone else's kid, who is getting a good education anyway, also has to learn about subjects that they don't care about, or their parents don't think are necessary, well, I'm not going to shed too many tears. It's not as though anyone is restricting the freedom of parents to seek out education above and beyond the baseline for their children. I also think part of where I'm not on the same page as some others is that I don't view education as being solely for the benefit of the individual being educated. I think there's social value in the levelling of the basic ciriculum across classes. I think there's social value to having a population that's consisently familiar with the same set of basic concepts and ideas. I think that, in certain subjects, especially civics, science, and economics, it's beneficial to everyone that each individual have a background in them. It's to your benefit that the people around you understand the basics of how our economy and our government work, and how the natural world works, even if they do not have any particular interest in those topics. For the record, I was not required to take either Calculus or French Literature in school, although I had the option to take, and did take, and hated, the former. I was required to take certain basic math and language arts classes, certain basic science classes, basic health and fitness classes, basic classes in civics, history, and economics, and probaby some other things I'm forgetting about, as well as to take X number of electives of my own choice. Finally, I am apparently a proponenet of the nanny state, because I think there are circumstances in which it is entirely appropriate for a judge or other government official to override the wishes of a parent for their children, or the children for themselves. I'm not going to insult everyone's intelligence by bringing up extreme examples. |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Also, don't you people know that my job is trolling and one liners and having an army of dopplegangers? WHY DO YOU KEEP STARTING SRS BSNS THRADS THAT I WANT TO RESPOND TO?
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
haha. Nah, I was just making a smartassed comment on the number of actual thoughtful thrads I've stumbled into as of late.
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
Note that I didn't really follow the story closely, so I don't know whether she was given the option to keep up with her education in some nonstandard way while sailing around the world or whatever. If not, then that's pretty stupid. Quote:
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
Of the 4 recent "youngest sailors" -Perham, Watson, the 2 Sunderland kids- 3 were homeschooled/distance educated (watson's family lived on a boat for like 5 years), because it is legal where they live. |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
I'll give you that it's unequal. The education she would receive in her months at sea is far better than what she would get in school, IMO. I do think public education is necessary for the more disadvantaged students who would have nothing else otherwise, but I am not comfortable with hobbling the better advantaged students to bring them down to the level of public education. If I'm wrong, and that is the right thing to do for society's sake if not the individual, then it is definitely nanny-state. |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Only if their homeschooling did not meet whatever standards of education their societies use (assuming there is one, of course, and if there isn't I think there should be).
ETA @ LS |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quoting myself, lol.
Quote:
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
Once a society decides that women's* rights can be denied them in the home classroom, empowering judges to overule parents is a no-brainer, I reckon. * or substitute gays, aspies or any one of a number of frequently undervalued groups |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Do bear in mind that not every child (or parent) realises how important certain skills can be.
It's all very well saying 'Oh, my son will never need calculus!', and it's all very well little Timmy agreeing that he doesn't need to know about limits and functions, but it'll be a hell of a problem when he gets to pick his major and realises he can't study engineering or physics or chemistry because he never learned basic calculus... There's also the problem that kids have no idea what they're good at or enjoy until they try. Learning the basics is hugely important simply for the kids to have a chance to learn where their interests and aptidues are in the first place. |
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
That's why I said: "I recommend offering all of them so the student will have a chance to challenge themselves and see what they are interested in or good at. But when the kid reaches that age where they know they just plain aren't into math, it's just cruel to force them to take year after year of algebra, geometry, etc. If they're not good at it, they're not going to go into a field that requires it, and vice versa. In the meantime it just causes fights and bad grades and feelings of failure." Quote:
|
Re: Fucking education! How does it work?
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.