Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
It appears that this is the only logical answer. The light travels to the lens from the object, therefore the light is dated. That's why I want to do the experiment. If the image of the person is not detected by the lens when the photons are being reflected in a straight line, why would the image not show up? And why would the image show up when the person moves a foot forward and the lens is able to form an image. Wouldn't that tell you something?
This is not going to work because every time you give this explanation, it will seem that this is the only explanation possible.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
If there is no other logically possible answer, no experiment is going to help you either. If you can't even conceive of an experimental outcome that would resolve the problem, then experiments are beside the point.
|
It is not beside the point. If an experiment contradicts what is supposed to happen according to a particular theory, then that theory has to be reconstructed or at least questioned. Even David says that. The mechanism as to how this occurs comes later.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
You have claimed that the wavelength of the light present at the camera, at the very moment the object changes color, is what determines the color of the real-time photographic image.
|
It isn't just the wavelength that is arriving at the lens. I'm going back to using the phrase "mirror image". It is the fact that the object has to be present that changes the entire perspective of what is occurring.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
So how does light matching the real-time color of the just-changed object get from the object to the camera instantaneously?
Your claim that cameras can match the real-time imaging of efferent vision is incoherent and impossible. You can see this for yourself, but you just keep on resorting to faith instead of accepting your own conclusions.
|
It's impossible if this is your logic. It's not impossible if there is an alternate logic. The lens focuses on THE OBJECT and the light is the flip side, so to speak. Why do we see an exact mirror image of a nature scene in a lake. We're not getting a dated image. This is the same phenomenon.