Thread: Climategate 2.0
View Single Post
  #58  
Old 11-27-2011, 10:48 PM
Kael's Avatar
Kael Kael is offline
the internet says I'm right
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western U.S.
Gender: Male
Posts: VMCDXLV
Blog Entries: 11
Default Re: Climategate 2.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickthinks View Post
Firstly, it doesn't show anything about the last 100 years very clearly because the time axis is far too long. If you were hoping to make a point about the apparent lack of correlation recently between CO2 levels and Antarctic temperatures , you made a spectacularly poor choice of graph.
Oh, JEROME is very, very careful about just which graphs he will tout as undeniable evidence and which he will ignore and/or claim are incorrect or incomplete. For example, the source of the graph he displayed is the virtual Global Climate Change exhibit hosted on the Marian Koshland Science Museum website. The very next page of that same exhibit presents this graph:

A smaller portion of the previous data set with the focus on a much more brief period of time, the past 1,000 years or so. Which, of course, very clearly shows exactly what he claims the parent graph does not.

I wonder how he'll choose to ignore this one?
__________________
For Science!
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Adam (11-28-2011), Ari (11-27-2011), Gooch's dad (11-27-2011), mickthinks (11-27-2011), Sauron (11-27-2011), SR71 (11-28-2011), Stormlight (11-28-2011), The Man (11-28-2011), Watser? (11-27-2011)
 
Page generated in 0.14303 seconds with 11 queries