Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
|
No no no no chuck! This is an effort to make it fit the present thought system that dogs can see just like we do because not to make the conclusions fit would disrupt the conclusions that the eyes are a sense organ. Dogs may recognize certain things but they cannot identify individuals by sight alone. |
 Yep, makes me lol every single time.
Quote:
You are trying so hard to keep up the pretense but you will lose Chuck, in due time of course. 
|
Maybe when the non-glandular homo-sexuals (and 98% of homo-sexual intercourse) have fallen by the wayside! Definitely before 1980 in any case. God told me. |
Thank you so much for displaying your lack of protocol and your inability to admit any wrongdoing in your phony analysis. Your display of disregard for proper and rigorous investigation should be condemned. |
...she said, while literally disregarding proper and rigorous investigation
Anyway, peacegirl, I am so glad you brought up protocol and proper and rigorous investigation! As you know, the Authentic Text tells us that "98% of homo-sexual intercourse comes into existence only because boys and girls are denied the opportunity to indulge with the opposite sex and fall in love." (Of course, you simply deleted this when preparing your cancerous Corrupted Text!)
peacegirl, what proper and rigorous investigations support that claim? What protocol and analyses underpin it? On what data set is it based? Which facts substantiate it?