Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
No. You are assuming that Supernovaes are millions of lightyears away.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
How close do you think the closest supernova was? And why would it make any difference? We're still not going to be able to see it until light from it has had time to reach our eyes.
|
You still don't understand why light would be at the eye in Lessans' account.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I believe Supernovae explosions are so huge and so bright that they have been seen with binoculars or the naked eye as they are happening.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Yes, supernovae are huge and bright. Yes, some can be seen unaided. But why would you think that means they are being seen in real time? Being big and bright doesn't exclude an event from the basic laws of physics.
|
This doesn't change the basic laws of physics.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Please don't respond.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
If you don't want people to respond, then don't post.
|
I will post if I have a reason, but I am not going to respond to people that don't add value to the conversation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I don't want to get into this again.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Why not? It just means more lying, weaseling, and evading for you. These are your greatest skills, so why would you not want to use them?
|
I'm tired of the false accusations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You think Lessans was wrong, so leave it at that.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Oh, come on. We both know Lessans was wrong. The only difference is that we can be honest about it.
|
Why is your goal to get me to admit something for your sake only?