View Single Post
  #51566  
Old 04-15-2018, 08:13 PM
peacegirl's Avatar
peacegirl peacegirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
Posts: XXMVCDXXXII
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin View Post
You know, multiple people of good faith pointed out to peacegirl multiple times in this thread that her no-little-ones-present proviso violated the Thou Shalt Not Blame Corollary. After all, what is the act of sending the little ones out of the room before bending the old lady over the dining room table and plowing her up the beloved genitalia and/or bunghole (is the bunghole a "sexual organ" according to the Authentic Text? :chin:) if not blaming the young 'uns for wanting to watch? That very topic was the subject of a Lessons from Lessans installment preserved here.

Now, thanks entirely to ChuckF and his mathematical, scientific and undeniable True Stewardship of the Authentic Text written and published by Seymour Lessans during his lifetime, we know that peacegirl's no-little-ones-present proviso is just more of her fraudulent, made-up bullshit that bears exactly zero resemblance to the author's real work. I cannot say why peacegirl's path of greater satisfaction involves making up fraudulent nonsense from whole cloth and presenting said fraudulent nonsense as the work of Seymour Lessans, but make no mistake - that is in fact peacegirl's path of greater satisfaction. :yup:
First of all, children are dealt with differently because they are not old enough to know what could hurt them. I put that line in because you tried to make the book look filthy. I took it out because parents already know that little ones don't belong in their bedroom or anywhere else where sex is concerned. Why? Because they are not married to their parents. A young child is not a sexual object to be used for someone else's benefit. It not only would be confusing to a younger child who may think daddy is hurting mommy, but an older child could be aroused, which would be completely inappropriate. This could cause serious harm to a child's psyche. Most parents want to protect their children, and having children in the room when they're having sex would be hurting the child emotionally, which no parent would want to do. But we know that already. :popcorn:
__________________
https://www.declineandfallofallevil....3-CHAPTERS.pdf

https://www.declineandfallofallevil.com/ebook/


"The fatal tendency of mankind to leave off thinking about a thing
which is no longer doubtful is the cause of half their errors" -- John Stuart Mill
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.13979 seconds with 11 queries