Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
You clearly need to re-answer the questions below. Please answer ONLY with respect to the specific photons being asked about (i.e. those at the film when the Sun is first ignited).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
You need photons at the camera film when the Sun is first ignited.
Are they traveling photons?
Did they come from the Sun?
Did they get to the film by traveling?
Did they travel at the speed of light?
Can they leave the Sun before it is ignited?
Can they arrive at the camera film less than 8min after leaving their source?
Will you answer these questions, or just weasel and ignore them?
Will you weasel by going off on an irrelevant tangent about information or reflection?
|
Unacceptable responses:
#1 Insisting that they have already been answered.
#2 Responding without giving at least a Yes or No as part of your answer.
#3 Answering by talking about photons other than those asked about.
#4 Insisting that previous and since retracted answers should be good enough.
#5 Insisting that contradictory answers should be good enough.
#6 Refusing to answer because of name-calling.
#7 Answering with irrelevant nonsense about mirror images, information, reflection, full spectrum light, absorption, the inverse square law, etc.
#8 Answering by talking about the eyes or brain instead of the camera and film being asked about.
#9 Fake conceding.
#10 Trying to change the subject. |
I have answered your questions with a yes or no, I have discussed the photons you are talking about, I have not answered with irrelevant nonsense about mirror images, information, reflection, full spectrum light, absorption, the inverse square law. I will continue to discuss the eyes and brain because his discovery was regarding efferent vision. If I feel the need to fake concede that's what I will do. I will change the subject when I decide to; I won't have to try.