View Single Post
  #14483  
Old 02-19-2012, 06:01 PM
peacegirl's Avatar
peacegirl peacegirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
Posts: XXMVCDXXXII
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
No no no. Optics does not contradict efferent vision.
"Does not contradict" is inadequate. In order to supplant the current scientific theory, it must do a better job of explaining how vision works.

...and regardless of what you claim, optics does in fact contradict efferent vision. You're just too dysfunctional to understand why.
Actually, I don't have to do anything more than what I've done. If no one wants to pursue it, then let it go. I offered Lessans' perception of what is really going on. I believe I expressed the model adequately. The eyes being efferent do not have to wait for the light to travel millions of miles to reach us in order to see the external world as long as there is enough light present and the object is large enough to be seen. And if you continue to take over where NA left off, just know that we won't be talking to each other much longer.

Last edited by peacegirl; 02-19-2012 at 10:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.11387 seconds with 11 queries