Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Wrong. It is not empirically based but based on accurate reasoning and astute observation.
|
That does not make it a scientific hypothesis. What kinds of tests could be set up to produce replicable results?
Quote:
By applying the principles because they do work. You will see why if you understand why man's will is not free and why conscience works in a very predictable way --- which can be duplicated.
|
This is an assertion based on little more than belief, not possible test parameters.
How would a scientist set up a controlled and time limited method of applying the principals and how would they track and compare the results? What exact hypothesis would they be testing?
If the hypothesis is "Humans do not have free will", what kind of experiment could that lead to?