Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You're right. I went back and saw that I had put it in earlier. I was mistaken.
|
I know, peacegirl. That's why I called you out for lying again.
Quote:
|
After some changes (due to constructive criticism), I lost track of when I made a particular revision. But this is neither here nor there. It's called nitpicking, and you're doing it because you can't find anything else on me.
|
It's called correcting your lies, peacegirl.
You should apologize to Stephen Maturin for your false accusation.
Quote:
|
I was his daughter. He entrusted me with his book. Nothing I added changed the significance or intent of his work.
|
peacegirl, I don't know whether or not you actually believe that, of if you're just lying again. I guess it's possible that you believe what you're saying. But either way - I don't. Neither do I think people should have to plod through your god-awful prose trying to guess which things you simply made up, and what you deleted because you didn't approve of it, and what you re-wrote to reflect your own agenda.
That's why, as the True Steward of the Authentic Text, I simply reject your entire Corrupted Text. We have no need of it here. Here, we interpret the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime. I don't get why you are so upset about that. |
I don't think it's god-awful. It's clear and elucidating. Why am I so upset? Because you're making a joke out of the book. You're not reading it to understand. You're reading it to get a laugh at his expense. I think some parts are funny too, but at least I know what he was getting at. Do you? No.