Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
This also presumes that economics is the best/only reason to support net neutrality.
|
This!
I'm pretty sure economists don't generally support public libraries, public schools, public roads, socialized medicine, social security, public beaches, public playgrounds, pools, and parks, banking regulations, rural electrification, etc; those same Chicago-school assholes of course don't approve of Net Neutrality. Why would they ever support
something that benefits people generally, when it could be put on the "free market" and every bit of value squeezed out of it on that "level playing field"? You know,
make believe.
Which is why economists and their fake science generally, and libertarian Von Mises-worshipping douches specifically, can go fuck themselves when it comes to their vision of what they want.
I give no fucks what economists think of Net Neutrality.