View Single Post
  #14500  
Old 02-20-2012, 01:10 PM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
It's amazing what lengths people will go to in order to make an accepted theory that has graduated into fact (and why I'm getting all this backlash), fit the premise.
Which experiments, principles, and/or laws in the standard model of optics and vision has had to be stretched, bent, squeezed or otherwise modified to "fit the premise". Name any empirical observation that remains unexplained by this robust model, or one that required "lengths" being gone to fit "the premise".

You're getting backlash because you are positing an incoherent non working model, that explains nothing actually observed in reality, as competition for a robust model that works every time, and expecting people to accept yours for no reason.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.15134 seconds with 11 queries