Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
You haven't been clarifying what Lessan meant about vision. You've been making things up because you don't know what he meant or how it could be made consistent with the known facts about the properties of light.
|
You're absolutely wrong... |
Am I? I don't think so...
Light needed at the retina according to Lessans' account?
You made that up.
Lenses that can affect distant light not yet at the lens?
You made that up.
Mirror images arriving at a film or retina before light gets there?
You made that up.
Non-absorbed light not being reflected?
You made that up.
'Closed systems' somehow negating actual distances?
You made that up.
Traveling partial spectra turning into full spectrum light?
You made that up.
No information in the arriving light?
You made that up.
The inverse square law preventing traveling light from being resolved?
You made that up.
The fiction that your account is plausible and contradiction-free?
You made that up too.