Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
It doesn’t actually assume compatibilism; it’s simply a logical demonstration that there can be no conflict between what we call determinism and what we style free will.
|
That has to depend on "what we style free will". I don't see how this sort of argument changes anything. |
Well, see my post just above. |
Yes, I've read it (before replying).
Quote:
|
But determinism is not incompatible with free will
|
That obviously depends on what you mean by free will. I thought the statement
"there can be no conflict between what we call determinism and what we style free will" doesn't make sense.