You better watch out. It sounds like you want the New York Times to become propagandists for your favored candidate. This makes you no different from your secret hero, Donald Trump.
Did Sydney Ember make up those quotes by political opponents of Sanders? Or did she just report the facts?
And I suppose you'd have the NYT just
not report on Sanders's dalliances with anti-American countries and organizations like the Soviet Union and Sandinistas! Those things are news! And if the Republicans hold hearings on them next October, or Jane Sanders dealings with Burlington College, which were the subject of an FBI investigation, the NYT will be justified in devoting even more coverage to them! In fact, justification doesn't even enter into it, that would be like discussing whether the wheels go on top or underneath a car like it's under the mechanic's discretion.
The fact is that if Bernie Sanders isn't doing well, it's because Bernie Sanders is a
shitty candidate. The NYT didn't let you down, Bernie Sanders did.
And how can the NYT be biased against Sanders if they also published positive articles like
this one or
this one, calling his immigration plan the best policy?
One can only conclude that you are a despicable liar.