Quote:
Originally Posted by JEROME DA GNOME
So, what place in science is the hiding of data?
Should not the conclusions be able to be replicated?
How can this be done when the data is hidden?
|
What data? What conclusions? All of it? Prolly not. Let's grant for a minute that something was covered up. How important would it be? Put this in perspective for me. Do we have 100%, 25%, 5%, .05% re AGW refuted? What exactly am I supposed to be getting excited about? Tropical troposphere? The article was noticeably short on details and long on broad declamatory statement.