Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnostic Christian Bishop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Quote:
|
Speculative nonsense is always lengthy.
|
Not at all: you seem to manage it in very few lines.
You claim male violence as a good reason to give females and homosexuals (male homosexuals apparently don't count as real males) easier access to firearms.
Rather than, say, doing something about the way we accept male violence as normal, to be expected, kind of natural.
. |
We do accept male violence as more normal. Look at any school yard.
You might also look at any other mammal to see how it is almost always the males that are the most violent.
Recognizing our own violence prone male natures is why I think it stupid to allow males to arm themselves more than females.
To continue to do the same thing while expecting things to get better is insane.
Regards
DL |
Are males allowed more access to weaponry than females or are you just making it up as you go along?
Also, please prove with evidence how people assigned male at birth on the basis of genitalia are inherently more violent than females who are gendered in the same way. Have you considered that the prominence of "male violence" is due to perpetually continued cultural norms as opposed to a genetic or hormonal fault?
...