Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Marketplace > The Sciences

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2012, 11:24 AM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Images: 41
Default Drive by science

I think we need a Miscellany thread for science stuff we come across. This is it.

Harvard makes distortion-free lens from gold and silicon, aims for the perfect image (or signal) -- Engadget
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
ceptimus (08-25-2012), Ensign Steve (08-25-2012), Janet (08-28-2012), Kael (08-25-2012), Kashmir (08-26-2012), naturalist.atheist (08-25-2012), Shelli (08-25-2012), Stormlight (09-24-2012)
  #2  
Old 08-25-2012, 04:03 PM
naturalist.atheist naturalist.atheist is offline
Reality Adventurer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: VMMCXXIX
Images: 7
Default Re: Drive by science

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
I think we need a Miscellany thread for science stuff we come across. This is it.

Harvard makes distortion-free lens from gold and silicon, aims for the perfect image (or signal) -- Engadget
Wouldn't it be cool if the micro antennas could be altered in situ to produce a completely solid state zoom lens?
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
LadyShea (08-27-2012)
  #3  
Old 08-26-2012, 08:02 PM
Kashmir Kashmir is offline
ellipsis . . .
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: MCCXCVI
Default Re: Drive by science

Hey, it's an example of phased-array optics.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
LadyShea (08-27-2012)
  #4  
Old 08-27-2012, 06:12 PM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Images: 41
Default Re: Drive by science

Whoa, didn't see this coming at all. I assumed the opposite.

Pediatrics group says circumcision's benefits outweigh risks amid U.S. decline in procedure
Quote:
The health benefits from male circumcision outweigh the risks, says the American Academy of Pediatrics in its latest guidelines on the controversial procedure published Monday.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
SR71 (08-29-2012)
  #5  
Old 08-29-2012, 10:12 PM
lisarea's Avatar
lisarea lisarea is offline
Solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: XVMCLXXVI
Blog Entries: 1
Images: 3
Default Re: Drive by science

This is more about science reporting than science proper, but it's still good:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QdD96OZFzA#!

(He also has a cool story about the time he robbed a bank, but it's not very sciencey.)
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Kael (08-30-2012), LadyShea (08-30-2012), SR71 (08-29-2012), Stormlight (09-24-2012)
  #6  
Old 08-30-2012, 09:30 AM
But's Avatar
But But is offline
This is the title that appears beneath your name on your posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: MVCLXXVIII
Default Re: Drive by science

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Whoa, didn't see this coming at all. I assumed the opposite.

Pediatrics group says circumcision's benefits outweigh risks amid U.S. decline in procedure
Quote:
The health benefits from male circumcision outweigh the risks, says the American Academy of Pediatrics in its latest guidelines on the controversial procedure published Monday.
Are you serious? Membership in that group is, I guess, the thing that's most strongly correlated with making money off the ritual. Hence the information content of their statement is close to zero. I would put them in the category of every other group that's about to lose an existing source of income and trying to prevent that. In terms of bias, that's where the most aggressive lobby groups are to be found.

[eta: never mind. That was probably sarcasm failure on my part.]
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
LadyShea (10-10-2015)
  #7  
Old 09-18-2012, 06:10 PM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Images: 41
Default Re: Drive by science

Dark Energy Camera: Sizing up the universe in pictures - latimes.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-18-2012, 08:06 PM
ceptimus's Avatar
ceptimus ceptimus is offline
puzzler
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: XMVCMII
Images: 28
Default Re: Drive by science

http://m.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-18-2012, 08:48 PM
slimshady2357's Avatar
slimshady2357 slimshady2357 is offline
forever in search of dill pickle doritos
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MVDCCXCIX
Blog Entries: 6
Images: 52
Default Re: Drive by science


:kirk:

'Warp drive' may be more feasible than thought, scientists say | Fox News
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
ceptimus (09-19-2012), Crumb (09-18-2012), Ensign Steve (09-18-2012), Kael (09-19-2012), LadyShea (10-02-2012), MonCapitan2002 (09-23-2012)
  #10  
Old 09-18-2012, 09:06 PM
Ari's Avatar
Ari Ari is offline
I read some of your foolish scree, then just skimmed the rest.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area
Gender: Male
Posts: MXCCLXIII
Blog Entries: 8
Default Re: Drive by science


Fuck Yeah Fluid Dynamics Tumblr
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Ensign Steve (09-18-2012), LadyShea (10-02-2012)
  #11  
Old 09-23-2012, 07:12 AM
MonCapitan2002's Avatar
MonCapitan2002 MonCapitan2002 is offline
Servant of the Dark Lord
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Gender: Bender
Posts: VMMMCLXV
Blog Entries: 12
Images: 1
Default Re: Drive by science

I wanted to share a video I came across on YouTube of Neil DeGrasse Tyson giving a lecture during Beyond Belief 2006.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson - Greatest Sermon Ever - YouTube

It almost comes across as a sermon. His passion for the sciences is both palpable and infectious. I wish I had heard of him 15 to 20 years ago.
__________________

Allan Glenn. 1984-2005 RIP
:countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep:
Under no circumstances should Quentin Tarantino be allowed to befoul Star Trek.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
LadyShea (10-02-2012)
  #12  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:08 PM
Crumb's Avatar
Crumb Crumb is offline
Cmurb!
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
Posts: LVMMD
Blog Entries: 22
Images: 355
Default Re: Drive by science

There might be a very cool comet in our future. :)

http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n12...yVuJI.facebook
__________________
:joecool2: :cascadia: :ROR: :portland: :joecool2:
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
ceptimus (09-27-2012), Demimonde (09-26-2012), LadyShea (10-02-2012), MonCapitan2002 (09-28-2012), slimshady2357 (09-27-2012)
  #13  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:32 PM
livius drusus's Avatar
livius drusus livius drusus is offline
Admin of THIEVES and SLUGABEDS
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: LVCCCLXXII
Images: 5
Default Re: Drive by science

Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Angakuk (10-01-2012), Ari (10-01-2012), Crumb (10-01-2012), Ensign Steve (10-01-2012), Kael (10-01-2012), LadyShea (10-02-2012)
  #14  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:24 PM
Ensign Steve's Avatar
Ensign Steve Ensign Steve is offline
He's back! for your fucking cheetos
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Gender: Bender
Posts: XXMXDCCXCII
Images: 66
Default Re: Drive by science

I'm no physicist or anything...

__________________
:kiwf::smurf:
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:33 PM
BrotherMan's Avatar
BrotherMan BrotherMan is offline
Domo Arigato Mister Roborto
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bortlandia
Gender: Male
Posts: XVCCCLXV
Blog Entries: 5
Images: 63
Default Re: Drive by science

I read the explanation when I first saw the video. I'm no rememberator, but I call it explosive rebound. Some portion of the explosive force pushed downward through the can, hitting the solid floor beneath and then reflecting enough of the remaining energy back into the can causing it to lift off the ground like it did.

I'm sure we have a scientist on staff who can tell me how wrong I am.
__________________
\V/_
I COVLD TEACh YOV BVT I MVST LEVY A FEE
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Ari (10-02-2012), Ensign Steve (10-01-2012), LadyShea (09-30-2012), livius drusus (09-30-2012)
  #16  
Old 10-02-2012, 05:43 PM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Images: 41
Default Re: Drive by science

Half of Great Barrer Reef lost in past 3 decades - CBS News
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
The Lone Ranger (10-15-2012)
  #17  
Old 10-03-2012, 04:58 PM
MonCapitan2002's Avatar
MonCapitan2002 MonCapitan2002 is offline
Servant of the Dark Lord
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Gender: Bender
Posts: VMMMCLXV
Blog Entries: 12
Images: 1
Sad Re: Drive by science

That really sucks. The article depressed me a little.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linked Article
The experts agree that doing nothing is not an option at this point. "The problem is entirely soluble, and coral reefs can be saved through concerted effort over this and the following two or three generations," said Kaufman. "There is absolutely no excuse for failure to do this, and if we do fail our generation will forever be remembered for unimaginable, unforgivable stupidity and sloth."
If that happens, then truer words were never spoken. I can't help but think our last few generations have done a damn good job of fucking over the planet.
__________________

Allan Glenn. 1984-2005 RIP
:countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep::countsheep:
Under no circumstances should Quentin Tarantino be allowed to befoul Star Trek.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
LadyShea (10-10-2012), The Lone Ranger (10-15-2012)
  #18  
Old 10-10-2012, 07:40 PM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Images: 41
Default Re: Drive by science

Is lightspeed really a limit? • The Register
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Ensign Steve (04-13-2016)
  #19  
Old 10-15-2012, 08:25 PM
slimshady2357's Avatar
slimshady2357 slimshady2357 is offline
forever in search of dill pickle doritos
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MVDCCXCIX
Blog Entries: 6
Images: 52
Default Re: Drive by science


:user:

Physicists May Have Evidence Universe Is A Computer Simulation
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
LadyShea (11-25-2012)
  #20  
Old 10-15-2012, 09:14 PM
The Lone Ranger's Avatar
The Lone Ranger The Lone Ranger is offline
Jin, Gi, Rei, Ko, Chi, Shin, Tei
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MXCCL
Images: 523
Default Re: Drive by science

Yeah, that's the sort of thing that can make you a little crazy, if you think about it too much.

It's something that computer scientists like to point out. The basic idea, as I understand it, goes like this:
  1. A sufficiently sophisticated computer could run a simulation of the Universe.
  2. There are potentially lots of computers out there running simulated Universes.
  3. There is only one real Universe.
  4. Therefore it is more probable that we are living in a computer-simulated Universe than that we're living in the real one.
  5. Sleepless nights ensue.
__________________
“The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be.”
-- Socrates
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Dingfod (10-26-2012), Janet (10-16-2012)
  #21  
Old 10-16-2012, 02:02 AM
naturalist.atheist naturalist.atheist is offline
Reality Adventurer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: VMMCXXIX
Images: 7
Default Re: Drive by science

It is interesting to note that it wouldn't take that many qbits to compute the universe. On the order of a thousand. It's almost recursive in that it appears the universe is basically quantum and quantum computers of modest size could in theory compute the universe.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
The Lone Ranger (10-16-2012)
  #22  
Old 10-16-2012, 03:17 AM
davidm's Avatar
davidm davidm is offline
Condemned to wander the corridors of a drivel maze
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: VMMMDCCCVI
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: Drive by science

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger View Post
Yeah, that's the sort of thing that can make you a little crazy, if you think about it too much.

It's something that computer scientists like to point out. The basic idea, as I understand it, goes like this:
  1. A sufficiently sophisticated computer could run a simulation of the Universe.
  2. There are potentially lots of computers out there running simulated Universes.
  3. There is only one real Universe.
  4. Therefore it is more probable that we are living in a computer-simulated Universe than that we're living in the real one.
  5. Sleepless nights ensue.
Right, it is Nick Bostrom's simulation argument.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
The Lone Ranger (10-18-2012)
  #23  
Old 10-16-2012, 06:43 AM
But's Avatar
But But is offline
This is the title that appears beneath your name on your posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: MVCLXXVIII
Default Re: Drive by science

Quote:
Originally Posted by naturalist.atheist View Post
It is interesting to note that it wouldn't take that many qbits to compute the universe. On the order of a thousand. It's almost recursive in that it appears the universe is basically quantum and quantum computers of modest size could in theory compute the universe.
No, quantum computers of modest size can simulate quantum systems of modest size. So maybe, maybe you could simulate a classical version of the universe (of course there is no such thing) but you can't get most of the answers out (you only get to measure once). To simulate a universe of qubits, you need a universe of qubits. Or more time. What you can get rid of is the exponential slowdown, which is huge.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Dragar (10-16-2012)
  #24  
Old 10-17-2012, 06:34 PM
But's Avatar
But But is offline
This is the title that appears beneath your name on your posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: MVCLXXVIII
Default Re: Drive by science

Okay, while we're at it (and after 5 hours of C++ template metaprogramming insanity), let's pose another question: If we were simulated by a computer, how would we find out what its characteristics are? We would have to measure it in some way, but until we do that, every possible computer of sufficient power that exists somewhere in spacetime and happens to be coded with our program is simulating us.

They may have trouble isolating it to maintain coherence. I imagine it is orbited by black holes that suck all the incoming particles and information off that could disturb the measurement.

BTW, who wants a C++ course?
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Ensign Steve (10-18-2012)
  #25  
Old 10-18-2012, 04:46 PM
The Lone Ranger's Avatar
The Lone Ranger The Lone Ranger is offline
Jin, Gi, Rei, Ko, Chi, Shin, Tei
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MXCCL
Images: 523
Default Re: Drive by science

Maybe black holes are what happened when the Programmer divided by 0.
__________________
“The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be.”
-- Socrates
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Dingfod (10-26-2012), Ensign Steve (10-18-2012), Janet (10-18-2012), Kael (10-18-2012), LadyShea (11-25-2012), Zehava (10-18-2012)
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Marketplace > The Sciences


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 1.04799 seconds with 14 queries