|
|
08-08-2016, 07:08 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You'll just have to trust me, or else order the book.
|
Uh, that doesn't really make sense.
|
Why not?
|
Because you have demonstrated that you are many things over the years, but "trustworthy" is most-definitely not on that list.
|
This whole thread is a lie. You've all tried to paint a false picture of who my father was and it will come back to haunt you. If you're so sure he was wrong it stands to reason that you would be overjoyed at my departure so you no longer have to correct my "errors".
|
08-08-2016, 07:28 PM
|
|
This is the title that appears beneath your name on your posts.
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You'll just have to trust me, or else order the book.
|
Uh, that doesn't really make sense.
|
Why not?
|
You're supposed to prove that you have a copy of the original. What does someone else ordering a copy of your modified version have to do with that?
|
08-08-2016, 07:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You'll just have to trust me, or else order the book.
|
Uh, that doesn't really make sense.
|
Why not?
|
You're supposed to prove that you have a copy of the original. What does someone else ordering a copy of your modified version have to do with that?
|
I wasn't referring to my version. Buying a copy from me would prove I have at least one of his copies. Why wouldn't I? I was his daughter and wanted to protect his books. I'm sure you would do the same thing if you were in my position.
|
08-08-2016, 07:44 PM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I . . . wanted to protect his works . . . .
|
The available evidence conclusively disproves that contention.
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
08-08-2016, 08:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I . . . wanted to protect his works . . . .
|
The available evidence conclusively disproves that contention.
|
It does no such thing.
|
08-08-2016, 08:57 PM
|
|
I'm Deplorable.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger
Because you have demonstrated that you are many things over the years, but "trustworthy" is most-definitely not on that list.
|
This whole thread is a lie. You've all tried to paint a false picture of who my father was and it will come back to haunt you. If you're so sure he was wrong it stands to reason that you would be overjoyed at my departure so you no longer have to correct my "errors".
|
Well at least part of that is true, we won't need to correct your errors, and it is true that everything you have posted is a lie. Everyone else has tried to paint a more accurate picture of you and Lessans for all those thousands of lurkers to read. Actually I am not overjoyed that you are leaving without realizing how wrong you have been over the years but I am sure that you and your father are wrong. I'm not at all concerned that ole' pinwheel Lessans will come back to haunt me, but I do feel sorry for him that he left his best joke in such poor hands.
__________________
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don’t know anything about. Wayne Dyer
|
08-08-2016, 09:01 PM
|
|
I'm Deplorable.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You'll just have to trust me, or else order the book.
|
Uh, that doesn't really make sense.
|
Why not?
|
You're supposed to prove that you have a copy of the original. What does someone else ordering a copy of your modified version have to do with that?
|
I wasn't referring to my version. Buying a copy from me would prove I have at least one of his copies. Why wouldn't I? I was his daughter and wanted to protect his books. I'm sure you would do the same thing if you were in my position.
|
No, anyone who had even an ounce of respect for their father, would want to preserve the true message that he was trying to relate to the world, not the corrupted version that you are trying to hawk as a meal ticket.
__________________
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don’t know anything about. Wayne Dyer
|
08-08-2016, 09:02 PM
|
|
I'm Deplorable.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I . . . wanted to protect his works . . . .
|
The available evidence conclusively disproves that contention.
|
It does no such thing.
|
Yes it does, shall we go on?
__________________
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don’t know anything about. Wayne Dyer
|
08-08-2016, 10:47 PM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Don't worry. As the steward of the Authentic Text, I will carry on.
|
You are doing the 100% nonreligious God's work, my friend. A certain thoroughly self-centered hack has ravaged the Authentic Text until it is wholly unrecognizable. But for your efforts, we never would have known the full extent of said hack's crimes. The Corrupt Text is corrupt, and must be treated as such.
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
08-08-2016, 11:03 PM
|
|
I'll be benched for a week if I keep these shenanigans up.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Got that photo of pages 115-116 ready to upload yet, Peacegirl?
|
Why just that page? Give me any page and I will give you the first line. Sure I could have gotten it off the internet like Chuck. You'll just have to trust me, or else order the book. I don't know of any bookstore that has an inventory of the original.
|
We won't trust you because you are a proven liar. We won't order the book because you clearly don't possess the authentic text. You were supposed to be uploading a photo of pp.115-116 to prove that you have it. But you can't because you don't. Dumbass.
__________________
video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor
|
08-08-2016, 11:07 PM
|
|
I'll be benched for a week if I keep these shenanigans up.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You'll just have to trust me, or else order the book.
|
Uh, that doesn't really make sense.
|
Why not?
|
You're supposed to prove that you have a copy of the original. What does someone else ordering a copy of your modified version have to do with that?
|
I wasn't referring to my version. Buying a copy from me would prove I have at least one of his copies. Why wouldn't I? I was his daughter and wanted to protect his books. I'm sure you would do the same thing if you were in my position.
|
No-one is going to buy the authentic text from you until you can first prove that you actually have it to sell. Why aren't you uploading pp.115-116? You've made a lot of silly excuses to avoid this, making it look very much as if you do not possess the text in question.
__________________
video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor
|
08-08-2016, 11:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You'll just have to trust me, or else order the book.
|
Uh, that doesn't really make sense.
|
Why not?
|
You're supposed to prove that you have a copy of the original. What does someone else ordering a copy of your modified version have to do with that?
|
I wasn't referring to my version. Buying a copy from me would prove I have at least one of his copies. Why wouldn't I? I was his daughter and wanted to protect his books. I'm sure you would do the same thing if you were in my position.
|
No-one is going to buy the authentic text from you until you can first prove that you actually have it to sell. Why aren't you uploading pp.115-116? You've made a lot of silly excuses to avoid this, making it look very much as if you do not possess the text in question.
|
What an idiot!
|
08-08-2016, 11:29 PM
|
|
I'll be benched for a week if I keep these shenanigans up.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
No-one is going to buy the authentic text from you until you can first prove that you actually have it to sell. Why aren't you uploading pp.115-116? You've made a lot of silly excuses to avoid this, making it look very much as if you do not possess the text in question.
|
What an idiot!
|
Well, look at that. Another post wherein PG fails to show that she has the authentic text.
__________________
video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor
|
08-08-2016, 11:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
No-one is going to buy the authentic text from you until you can first prove that you actually have it to sell. Why aren't you uploading pp.115-116? You've made a lot of silly excuses to avoid this, making it look very much as if you do not possess the text in question.
|
What an idiot!
|
Well, look at that. Another post wherein PG fails to show that she has the authentic text.
|
What a dumbass!
Last edited by peacegirl; 08-09-2016 at 11:35 AM.
|
08-08-2016, 11:58 PM
|
|
I'll be benched for a week if I keep these shenanigans up.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
No-one is going to buy the authentic text from you until you can first prove that you actually have it to sell. Why aren't you uploading pp.115-116? You've made a lot of silly excuses to avoid this, making it look very much as if you do not possess the text in question.
|
What an idiot!
|
Well, look at that. Another post wherein PG fails to show that she has the authentic text.
|
What a dumbass!
|
And another one. Looks like she doesn't have the authentic text, and can't do anything about it but call people names. How sad.
__________________
video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor
|
08-09-2016, 12:10 AM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
ChuckF reviews the Authentic Text and notes an intriguing change-of-pronoun corruption. In the background, PupF recognizes the Authentic Text by sight alone.
|
08-09-2016, 12:37 AM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Looks like she doesn't have the authentic text, and can't do anything about it but call people names.
|
Clearly true, but in any event I'll be relying exclusively on ChuckF to find out what Authentic Text says. The hack who cobbled together the Corrupted Text cannot be trusted, and is only here to half-demand, half-beg money from us.
Disgraceful.
As Chuck has just shown us, the blinding brilliance of the Authentic Text reduces dogs to a state of blissful unconsciousness. Also, lol "those of us who are not sexually satisfied."
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
08-09-2016, 09:25 AM
|
|
Astroid the Foine Loine between a Poirate and a Farrrmer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
That's funny - the corrupted text does not mention that divorce is still possible. If the man can afford to pay for multiple families, that is. Or if he is not getting his rocks off satisfactorily.
|
08-09-2016, 11:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
That's funny - the corrupted text does not mention that divorce is still possible. If the man can afford to pay for multiple families, that is. Or if he is not getting his rocks off satisfactorily.
|
You are the one corrupting this book. Divorce is always possible especially if someone has already fallen in love with someone else. After they become citizens, they will be free to leave, no questions asked. The whole purpose of the chapter on marriage is to show that when the conditions that lead to anger, resentment, and dissatisfaction in general are removed (which includes other outside factors such as economic insecurity), and the principles applied, he may not want to leave after all. This thread is a perfect example of how people can purposely misconstrue what they read because that's what they want to do.
Last edited by peacegirl; 08-09-2016 at 11:57 AM.
|
08-09-2016, 12:03 PM
|
|
I'll be benched for a week if I keep these shenanigans up.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
That's funny - the corrupted text does not mention that divorce is still possible. If the man can afford to pay for multiple families, that is. Or if he is not getting his rocks off satisfactorily.
|
You are the one corrupting this book. Divorce is always possible especially if someone has already fallen in love with someone else. After they become citizens, they will be free to leave, no questions asked. The whole purpose of the chapter on marriage is to show that when the conditions that lead to anger, resentment, and dissatisfaction in general are removed (which includes other outside factors such as economic insecurity), and the principles applied, he may not want to leave after all. This thread is a perfect example of how people can purposely misconstrue what they read because that's what they want to do.
|
What an idiot!
__________________
video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor
|
08-09-2016, 01:15 PM
|
|
Astroid the Foine Loine between a Poirate and a Farrrmer
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
That's funny - the corrupted text does not mention that divorce is still possible. If the man can afford to pay for multiple families, that is. Or if he is not getting his rocks off satisfactorily.
|
You are the one corrupting this book. Divorce is always possible especially if someone has already fallen in love with someone else. After they become citizens, they will be free to leave, no questions asked. The whole purpose of the chapter on marriage is to show that when the conditions that lead to anger, resentment, and dissatisfaction in general are removed (which includes other outside factors such as economic insecurity), and the principles applied, he may not want to leave after all. This thread is a perfect example of how people can purposely misconstrue what they read because that's what they want to do.
|
Not according to your book. Or according to the things you have been saying: according to you, personality wont matter because no-one would have a abd personality anymore, and it would simply become impossible for anyone to want to leave.
Now all of a sudden, when confronted with what your father actually said, you are backtracking and saying there just wont be as many divorces.
Your version really is very different from the original.
|
08-09-2016, 01:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
That's funny - the corrupted text does not mention that divorce is still possible. If the man can afford to pay for multiple families, that is. Or if he is not getting his rocks off satisfactorily.
|
You are the one corrupting this book. Divorce is always possible especially if someone has already fallen in love with someone else. After they become citizens, they will be free to leave, no questions asked. The whole purpose of the chapter on marriage is to show that when the conditions that lead to anger, resentment, and dissatisfaction in general are removed (which includes other outside factors such as economic insecurity), and the principles applied, he may not want to leave after all. This thread is a perfect example of how people can purposely misconstrue what they read because that's what they want to do.
|
Not according to your book. Or according to the things you have been saying: according to you, personality wont matter because no-one would have a abd personality anymore, and it would simply become impossible for anyone to want to leave.
Now all of a sudden, when confronted with what your father actually said, you are backtracking and saying there just wont be as many divorces.
Your version really is very different from the original.
|
There is no way I'm backtracking. My version is verbatim other than my examples. There is nothing underhanded.
|
08-09-2016, 02:09 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Divorce is always possible especially if someone has already fallen in love with someone else.
|
With someone else's sexual organs, that is.
|
08-09-2016, 02:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Divorce is always possible especially if someone has already fallen in love with someone else.
|
With someone else's sexual organs, that is.
|
I forgive you for being so ignorant. It will still be hard to accept your flagrant misinterpretation of the text which has nothing to do with this book.
|
08-09-2016, 02:26 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Divorce is always possible especially if someone has already fallen in love with someone else.
|
With someone else's sexual organs, that is.
|
I forgive you for being so ignorant. It will still be hard to accept your flagrant misinterpretation of the text which has nothing to do with this book.
|
Whoa, whoa - we don't fall in love with sexual organs regardless of what "her" features are like? Because that is what the Authentic Text says.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 AM.
|
|
|
|