A revolution in thought

[But]

Originally Posted by Florence Jellem

Flo agrees. I will never be happy until there is a connection between the optic nerve and the guardians of truth.

[Florence Jellem]

The Only Way Marbles Will Touch




You Know What I Meant




Spacemonkey Needs to Put His Thinking Cap On




On What Keeps Us Ignorant




Maybe Spacemonkey Needs a Diagram




Flo can't decide whether the mashup quotes or the real ones are more hilarious. Maybe we should run a poll or something.

[Florence Jellem]

What’s so hilarious to Flo is that the mashup quotes and the verbatim ones are essentially indistinguishable. You couldn’t tell which is which unless you knew ahead of time, and both would likely fail the Turing test.

[Florence Jellem]

It Catches Up …




… It Does Not Catch Up!




If You Hit the Ball You’re Going to Be Thrown Off Track




Even Though There Is No Brain




Do You Even Know What That Means?

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by Florence Jellem

Flo can't decide whether the mashup quotes or the real ones are more hilarious. Maybe we should run a poll or something.

Where are you going to run the pole? Should I call you Vlad?

[Florence Jellem]

You’ll Try to Cream Me With No Proof




It’s Self-Explanatory




Why People Are Up in Arms (The Mystery of the Distant Past)




A Failure of Understanding (Along With a Note on the Inverse Square Law)





There is No Gap Between Locations

[But]

Not bad. This is pretty deep stuff.

[Florence Jellem]

Also, some nice ones from LadyShea. Somehow her posts are much more coherent, concise and to the point.

You Sound Like an Idiot




Lunatic Word Salad




Nailed to a Cross




You’re an Idiot Who Says Crazy Shit




A Histrionic Revenge Fantasy

[Florence Jellem]

The Sayings of Chairwoman Peacegirl

Peacegirl Sees the Confusion
I see the confusion. You are treating photons as if they are independent of the object and they travel along a path that reaches the lens in the order in which they arrived.

Peacegirl Is Trying to Figure It Out
I am trying to figure out how efferent vision would work.

A Camera Is Connected to the Object It Is Photographing
I'm saying that a camera, although a light detector, is connected to the object that it is photographing.

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Introductory)
Oh really? So what are the lenses focusing on LadyShea? Photons?

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Intermediate)
That's not true LadyShea. They focus on the object or lightsource. You don't know what you're talking about.

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Advanced)
Don't you see how your definitions are f'd up LadyShea? They are not reflective of anything real, but you will defend to the death, yet I'm the one targeted as a nut case? Cameras are neither efferent or afferent. They focus on the object and the light is instantly projected onto the lens.

Brownie, You’re Doing a Heck of a Job
I believe I've done a good a good job at expressing the nature of these claims.

The Proof Is in the Pudding, but Where’s the Beef?
Actual proof of efferent vision is not easy to come by.

What the Heck Were We Thinking?
You seem to think that light from that source can travel along while the source is no longer present.

Peacegirl Is Learning a Lot
I'm learning a lot.

A Case of Chronomentrophobia
Forget clocks, they spook me because of special relativity.

Fuck the Moons of Jupiter
I am not interested in the moons of Jupiter experiment.

Use It or Lose It
I never said energy cannot be destroyed, but it's how we use that energy that counts.

An Analogy Is Made to Be Blue in the Face
You can keep making this analogy blue in the face; it doesn't change the fact that SEEING, apart from the OBJECT OR IMAGE, is IMPOSSIBLE.

Light Does Not Go to the Bar for a Beer
All I meant by that is that the light is present. I didn't mean it hangs around and goes to the bar for a beer.

Peacegirl Gives People Leeway
As far as saying "if" efferent vision is true, I want people to have some leeway. To say that I know it's true will get me in trouble and I'll be called a “fundamentalist."

The Problem With Empirical Testing
That seems to be the problem with empirical testing in general. They don't seem as reliable as they could be because they don't have enough reliability.

As Different as Night and Day
I see daylight when the sun is on my side of the earth.

How Can LadyShea Say Photons Are Not Their Own Light Source?
How can you say photons are not their own light source? They are producing light. Note: popcorn is peacegirl’s.

More later, when Flo sobers up …

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Florence Jellem

The Sayings of Chairwoman Peacegirl

Peacegirl Sees the Confusion
I see the confusion. You are treating photons as if they are independent of the object and they travel along a path that reaches the lens in the order in which they arrived.

Peacegirl Is Trying to Figure It Out
I am trying to figure out how efferent vision would work.

A Camera Is Connected to the Object It Is Photographing
I'm saying that a camera, although a light detector, is connected to the object that it is photographing.

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Introductory)
Oh really? So what are the lenses focusing on LadyShea? Photons?

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Intermediate)
That's not true LadyShea. They focus on the object or lightsource. You don't know what you're talking about.

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Advanced)
Don't you see how your definitions are f'd up LadyShea? They are not reflective of anything real, but you will defend to the death, yet I'm the one targeted as a nut case? Cameras are neither efferent or afferent. They focus on the object and the light is instantly projected onto the lens.

Brownie, You’re Doing a Heck of a Job
I believe I've done a good a good job at expressing the nature of these claims.

The Proof Is in the Pudding, but Where’s the Beef?
Actual proof of efferent vision is not easy to come by.

What the Heck Were We Thinking?
You seem to think that light from that source can travel along while the source is no longer present.

Peacegirl Is Learning a Lot
I'm learning a lot.

A Case of Chronomentrophobia
Forget clocks, they spook me because of special relativity.

Fuck the Moons of Jupiter
I am not interested in the moons of Jupiter experiment.

Use It or Lose It
I never said energy cannot be destroyed, but it's how we use that energy that counts.

An Analogy Is Made to Be Blue in the Face
You can keep making this analogy blue in the face; it doesn't change the fact that SEEING, apart from the OBJECT OR IMAGE, is IMPOSSIBLE.

Light Does Not Go to the Bar for a Beer
All I meant by that is that the light is present. I didn't mean it hangs around and goes to the bar for a beer.

Peacegirl Gives People Leeway
As far as saying "if" efferent vision is true, I want people to have some leeway. To say that I know it's true will get me in trouble and I'll be called a “fundamentalist."

The Problem With Empirical Testing
That seems to be the problem with empirical testing in general. They don't seem as reliable as they could be because they don't have enough reliability.

As Different as Night and Day
I see daylight when the sun is on my side of the earth.

How Can LadyShea Say Photons Are Not Their Own Light Source?
How can you say photons are not their own light source? They are producing light. Note: popcorn is peacegirl’s.

More later, when Flo sobers up …

Laugh all you want people. None of what I said in defense of Lessans' claim can be used against him because of my responses. It's a lame effort. I don't know if anyone is actually taking the time to study Lessans' book, Decline and Fall of All Evil that Chuck is boasting at finding. I'm happy if he is actually putting this book on the map with my presence or without it. In the economic chapter, before my father died, he said that a person who needed help from the taxpayers would not be a loan. Rather the deficit in his standard of living would be paid free of cost. Please understand that this discovery took years and years to figure out so don't attack him because he didn't get the extension perfect in the short years he lived. This in itself does not in any way negate his discovery.

[Spacemonkey]

Originally Posted by Florence Jellem

The Sayings of Chairwoman Peacegirl

Peacegirl Sees the Confusion
I see the confusion. You are treating photons as if they are independent of the object and they travel along a path that reaches the lens in the order in which they arrived.

Peacegirl Is Trying to Figure It Out
I am trying to figure out how efferent vision would work.

A Camera Is Connected to the Object It Is Photographing
I'm saying that a camera, although a light detector, is connected to the object that it is photographing.

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Introductory)
Oh really? So what are the lenses focusing on LadyShea? Photons?

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Intermediate)
That's not true LadyShea. They focus on the object or lightsource. You don't know what you're talking about.

Peacegirl’s Tutorials on Focusing (Advanced)
Don't you see how your definitions are f'd up LadyShea? They are not reflective of anything real, but you will defend to the death, yet I'm the one targeted as a nut case? Cameras are neither efferent or afferent. They focus on the object and the light is instantly projected onto the lens.

Brownie, You’re Doing a Heck of a Job
I believe I've done a good a good job at expressing the nature of these claims.

The Proof Is in the Pudding, but Where’s the Beef?
Actual proof of efferent vision is not easy to come by.

What the Heck Were We Thinking?
You seem to think that light from that source can travel along while the source is no longer present.

Peacegirl Is Learning a Lot
I'm learning a lot.

A Case of Chronomentrophobia
Forget clocks, they spook me because of special relativity.

Fuck the Moons of Jupiter
I am not interested in the moons of Jupiter experiment.

Use It or Lose It
I never said energy cannot be destroyed, but it's how we use that energy that counts.

An Analogy Is Made to Be Blue in the Face
You can keep making this analogy blue in the face; it doesn't change the fact that SEEING, apart from the OBJECT OR IMAGE, is IMPOSSIBLE.

Light Does Not Go to the Bar for a Beer
All I meant by that is that the light is present. I didn't mean it hangs around and goes to the bar for a beer.

Peacegirl Gives People Leeway
As far as saying "if" efferent vision is true, I want people to have some leeway. To say that I know it's true will get me in trouble and I'll be called a “fundamentalist."

The Problem With Empirical Testing
That seems to be the problem with empirical testing in general. They don't seem as reliable as they could be because they don't have enough reliability.

As Different as Night and Day
I see daylight when the sun is on my side of the earth.

How Can LadyShea Say Photons Are Not Their Own Light Source?
How can you say photons are not their own light source? They are producing light. Note: popcorn is peacegirl’s.

More later, when Flo sobers up …

People will not be Loans
In the economic chapter, before my father died, he said that a person who needed help from the taxpayers would not be a loan.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Spacemonkey

People will not be Loans
In the economic chapter, before my father died, he said that a person who needed help from the taxpayers would not be a loan.

You can twist and twist what he wrote all you want. My responses mean nothing at all. You can laugh all you want but it won't stop me from my mission. It's too important!

[peacegirl]

Please please listen to the author, no one else. Everything else is distorted and will not do this man's discoveries justice.

Beyond the Framework of Modern Thought eBook Sample - Decline and Fall of All Evil

[Stephen Maturin]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Laugh all you want people.

Okie dokie.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Please please listen to the author, no one else. Everything else is distorted and will not do this man's discoveries justice.

Beyond the Framework of Modern Thought eBook Sample - Decline and Fall of All Evil

Dear listeners, please be advised that even the tapes have been Corrupted! I previously addressed peacegirl's Corruption of the tapes but will repost it here for the benefit of the listeners who may otherwise be gulled into believing that these are the Authentic tapes as recorded by the author in his lifetime!

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Jesus Christ, you took the whole paragraph out of your Corrupted Text.

In the hamfisted corruption of the tape (beginning around 16:20) you took out all of the underlined words to attempt to completely change the meaning of the paragraph.

Try to read along with us now:

[Stephen Maturin]

Of course, we can't blame peacegirl for her egregious fraud in doctoring that tape. In this free will environment, with the attendant conditions of blame and justification, her conscience is operating at a 2 or a 3 at the very most.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Dear listeners, please be advised that even the tapes have been Corrupted! I previously addressed peacegirl's Corruption of the tapes but will repost it here for the benefit of the listeners who may otherwise be gulled into believing that these are the Authentic tapes as recorded by the author in his lifetime!

I admitted that already. I was afraid people would be offended, which they were. There may be no environmental influences to gender. It's not here nor there. I will put his words back and hope that this issue will not prejudice his discovery. Thanks Chuck.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin

Of course, we can't blame peacegirl for her egregious fraud in doctoring that tape. In this free will environment, with the attendant conditions of blame and justification, her conscience is operating at a 2 or a 3 at the very most.

I'm sorry Maturin. You're so right. I will never doctor his words again. His words speak for themselves. Before he died, he did tell me something I never forgot. He said to me that there would be no loans to pay back if someone needed help. I never forgot what he said to me as a faithful steward.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin

Of course, we can't blame peacegirl for her egregious fraud in doctoring that tape. In this free will environment, with the attendant conditions of blame and justification, her conscience is operating at a 2 or a 3 at the very most.

I'm sorry Maturin. You're so right. Inadvertently I did him a disservice. I will never doctor his words again. His words speak for themselves. I will say, once again, that many years later after careful analysis, he said to me that there would be no loans to pay back if someone needed help.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I will put his words back

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I will never doctor his words again. His words speak for themselves.

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Please please listen to the author, no one else. Everything else is distorted and will not do this man's discoveries justice.

peacegirl -

As the True Steward of the Authentic Text, I am pleased to welcome you to our grand project of rejecting the Corrupted Text. As you now recognize, the Corrupted Text must be rejected because the Corrupted Text is Corrupt. There is no authentic text but the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime. I am gratified that I, the True Steward of the Authentic Text, have managed to bring this light to you.

Of course, the truth (as they say) is in the pudding that is in the horse's mouth.

[But]

peacegirl!

[But]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

You can twist and twist what he wrote all you want. My responses mean nothing at all. You can laugh all you want but it won't stop me from my mission. It's too important!

[Florence Jellem]

Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin

Of course, we can't blame peacegirl for her egregious fraud in doctoring that tape. In this free will environment, with the attendant conditions of blame and justification, her conscience is operating at a 2 or a 3 at the very most.

That her conscience is operating at a 2 or 3 is as 3 is to 6 and 4 is to 8, dear.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Jesus Christ, you took the whole paragraph out of your Corrupted Text.

In the hamfisted corruption of the tape (beginning around 16:20) you took out all of the underlined words to attempt to completely change the meaning of the paragraph.

Try to read along with us now:

No shit.

I did not take anything else out. Having the print version you can easily see no other changes were made. The meaning of the paragraph was not corrupted just because that comment was removed. People are using his benign comments regarding homosexuality against him for no good reason, which is why I removed it. It is just another distraction. But when I have time I'm going to put it back in. I'm sure he didn't realize how sensitive this issue would become. Regardless, it does not negate his discovery in any way, shape, or form.

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Laugh all you want people.

3 1/2 days, not bad.