|
|
07-15-2017, 07:50 AM
|
|
Quality Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Luxembourg
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
|
07-15-2017, 09:21 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Taking time to consider his answer is an improvement over Spicer's flailing and hiding in the bushes.
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-15-2017, 09:53 AM
|
|
I read some of your foolish scree, then just skimmed the rest.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
He's so still when thinking I checked to see if the video was still playing.
I'm also surprised there's anyone that's willing to get even close to this administration.
|
07-15-2017, 10:05 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Propane Jane just had a good rant about the clusterfuck in the White House and how they can't even hire good help:
Propane Jane™ (@docrocktex26) | Twitter
Knock yourself out, decent reading.
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-15-2017, 12:18 PM
|
|
Safety glasses off, motherfuckers
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sarasota, FL
Gender: Bender
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Well of course they can't hire good help. Good help expects to get paid; there's no way it'd serve a horror show like this administration for free.
Which specific tweet was it, btw? Your link goes to her feed.
Plus:
Also, too (via LGM), Yglesias makes a good observation:
Quote:
But there is still such a thing as common sense. I don’t believe Trump Jr.’s account, and neither should you. He’s a man with negative credibility on this matter, and despite his father’s talismanic invocation of the word “transparency,” he’s been anything but transparent about it.
It’s certainly conceivable that he’s telling the truth and no valuable information changed hands. But when you are caught lying over and over again about a meeting — first by saying it never happened and then slowly being caught out in lie after lie — a reasonable observer is going to doubt you when you claim that this time you’ve fully come clean.
Until Trump Jr. answers a lot more questions and produces a lot more information, there’s no reason to assume good faith on his part. The benefit of the doubt is a valuable commodity, and it’s one that those at the highest levels of Trumpland have squandered.
[…]
But as the old saying says, fool me twice, shame on me. Trump Jr. has already tried to fool us four or five times about this meeting, and there’s absolutely no reason we should trust him. Fox News, tellingly, has in part already moved on to justifying collusion, showing little faith from Trumpworld that the denials of collusion will hold up over the long run. Those of us who aren’t in the tank ought to muster at least the same level of skepticism.
|
__________________
Cēterum cēnseō factiōnem Rēpūblicānam dēlendam esse īgnī ferrōque.
|
07-16-2017, 01:29 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-17-2017, 03:23 PM
|
|
Quality Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Luxembourg
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
White House voter commission publishes names, numbers of worried citizens | Ars Technica
Voter intimidation! We has it!
Quote:
Shortly before the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity is set to have its first meeting on Wednesday July 19 the controversial committee published hundreds of pages from concerned citizens about the group’s work. In some cases, the White House released citizens’ phone numbers and e-mail addresses, seemingly without their knowledge.
|
|
Thanks, from:
|
Ari (07-17-2017), chunksmediocrites (07-21-2017), Corona688 (07-17-2017), Crumb (07-17-2017), Kamilah Hauptmann (07-17-2017), lisarea (07-17-2017), Nullifidian (07-17-2017), Sock Puppet (07-20-2017), Stephen Maturin (07-17-2017), The Man (07-17-2017), Watser? (07-17-2017), Zehava (07-17-2017)
|
07-17-2017, 10:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Even assuming the best and saying that it's not deliberate, it's indicative of the sort of incompetence that should make everyone leery of having their private voter data handed over to the commission.
|
07-18-2017, 12:27 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-18-2017, 01:01 AM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Couldn't find any mention of Trump's nomination of John K. Bush to fill a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, but this shit is totally off the goddamn rails. The Senate Judiciary Committee voted (11-9, along party lines) to send the nomination to the full Senate.
Nominating people you think will decide cases in a reliably "conservative" manner is one thing. You'd expect nothing different from a GOP administration. But this guy is a garden variety an unhinged lunatic wingnut blogger. Some of his more batshit batshittery is featured in the "Judicial Temperament" section starting on page 4 of this here report. Jesus. Fucking. Fuck.
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
07-18-2017, 02:56 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Some of his more batshit batshittery is featured in the "Judicial Temperament" section starting on page 4 of this here report. Jesus. Fucking. Fuck.
|
Quote:
In a talk he gave to a private Louisville club he chose, according to his written notes, to recite and apparently condone a quote by another author that employs an anti-gay slur: I come here every year, and let me tell you one thing Ive learnedthis is no town to be giving people the impression youre some kind of faggot.
|
Spraying milk out my nose upon reading something is becoming a sign of 'This is perfectly normal in modern America.'
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-18-2017, 10:04 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-18-2017, 10:41 AM
|
|
Quality Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Luxembourg
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
|
07-19-2017, 08:29 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-20-2017, 06:33 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-20-2017, 09:48 AM
|
|
Projecting my phallogos with long, hard diction
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dee Cee
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
It's favorability, not net favorability. His net is -14. And his net job approval is slightly worse, -16.
And it's one poll. Another recent poll found that by a margin of 49 to 42%, Americans would prefer Hillary were president instead of Trump (and a margin of 53 to 40% preferring Obama).
I suspect despite the respondents saying it wasn't the reason, Hillary losing was a big part of her numbers being so bad. Conversely, if she had won she'd probably have gotten a bump in her numbers. I'd like to believe particularly if Democrats had won the Senate and therefore she was able to appoint someone good to the Supreme Court, but I get the impression that that's not worth very much credit in the eyes of petulant leftists who would be disappointed that actually having the presidency doesn't mean you can just yell at Republicans in Congress and get what you want (it doesn't even necessarily work when they're the same party, as Trump is learning).
(Consider the difference in how Ruth Bader Ginsburg is seen compared to the man who appointed her, and how many idiots insisted Clinton would appoint someone who'd support Citizens United despite both of her husband's appointees dissenting in that case, etc.)
|
07-20-2017, 09:51 AM
|
|
Shitpost Sommelier
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
__________________
Peering from the top of Mount Stupid
|
07-20-2017, 12:41 PM
|
|
forever in search of dill pickle doritos
|
|
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Drain the cockpit!
|
07-20-2017, 02:06 PM
|
|
Mr. Condescending Dick Nose
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Augsburg
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by erimir
It's favorability, not net favorability.
|
Bloomberg labelled their graph "net favorable" —
— which raises the question "wtf are Bloomberg talking about?".
His net is -14. And his net job approval is slightly worse, -16.
So do we have her net figure?
__________________
... it's just an idea
|
07-20-2017, 06:44 PM
|
|
Projecting my phallogos with long, hard diction
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dee Cee
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
I think they might have meant total instead of net? They might have asked about strongly vs somewhat favorable.
|
07-21-2017, 01:28 AM
|
|
ne plus ultraviolet
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
I find the chest-beating in the US about how sinister Russia attempted to influence the sacred election process in our country to be the signal flare of people unversed in US history and foreign policy- do they know our government historically has been much more active than Russia in attempting to influence the outcome of foreign elections?
The U.S. is no stranger to interfering in the elections of other countries- LA Times Dec 2016:
Quote:
The U.S. has a long history of attempting to influence presidential elections in other countries – it’s done so as many as 81 times between 1946 and 2000, according to a database amassed by political scientist Dov Levin of Carnegie Mellon University.
That number doesn’t include military coups and regime change efforts following the election of candidates the U.S. didn’t like, notably those in Iran, Guatemala and Chile. Nor does it include general assistance with the electoral process, such as election monitoring.
Levin defines intervention as “a costly act which is designed to determine the election results [in favor of] one of the two sides.” These acts, carried out in secret two-thirds of the time, include funding the election campaigns of specific parties, disseminating misinformation or propaganda, training locals of only one side in various campaigning or get-out-the-vote techniques, helping one side design their campaign materials, making public pronouncements or threats in favor of or against a candidate, and providing or withdrawing foreign aid.
|
I don't want Russia influencing our elections. But it might make the US look a hair less hypocritical to stop doing this ourselves, or else acknowledge that this is what a number of nations do as a matter of course, including the US.
|
Thanks, from:
|
Ari (07-21-2017), Crumb (07-21-2017), Dingfod (08-07-2017), JoeP (07-21-2017), Kamilah Hauptmann (07-21-2017), lisarea (07-21-2017), Nullifidian (07-23-2017), Sock Puppet (07-22-2017), Stephen Maturin (07-21-2017), Stormlight (07-21-2017), The Man (07-21-2017), Watser? (07-21-2017)
|
07-21-2017, 01:41 AM
|
|
Fishy mokey
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Furrin parts
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
chunks
|
07-21-2017, 02:56 PM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: Good King Trump
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kamilah Hauptmann
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Some of his more batshit batshittery is featured in the "Judicial Temperament" section starting on page 4 of this here report. Jesus. Fucking. Fuck.
|
Quote:
In a talk he gave to a private Louisville club he chose, according to his written notes, to recite and apparently condone a quote by another author that employs an anti-gay slur: I come here every year, and let me tell you one thing Ive learnedthis is no town to be giving people the impression youre some kind of faggot.
|
Spraying milk out my nose upon reading something is becoming a sign of 'This is perfectly normal in modern America.'
|
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM.
|
|
|
|