Parents, do your due diligence on vaccination! There are serious risks!!

[But]

Originally Posted by But

Why has no one noticed that the planet is in a different position from where the radio signal comes from?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by But

WTF? This is not the right thread and you know it. You base all of your disregard and disrespect for my father on the belief that he was wrong. Sorry, but I don’t believe he was wrong. So let’s leave we’ll enough alone. After all, you have science behind you, my father was just a crank. So you have nothing to worry about.

[But]

So what's going on there?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by But

So what's going on there?

Doesn’t matter But. You know Lessans was wrong, so please drop it.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

You base all of your disregard and disrespect for my father on the belief that he was wrong. Sorry, but I don’t believe he was wrong. So let’s leave we’ll enough alone.

Then why did you Corrupt his intellectual legacy, peacegirl? If you didn't think he was wrong, and want to leave well enough alone, why churn out your malignant Corrupted Text? To hawk it for lucre, of course.

[But]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Doesn’t matter But. You know Lessans was wrong, so please drop it.

Have you called NASA yet? I'm sure there are people who can help you with this mystery.

Originally Posted by peacegirl

WTF? This is not the right thread and you know it.

If only you had realized that "this is not the right book" when you copypasted that antivax crap into your Dad's book.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by But

Have you called NASA yet? I'm sure there are people who can help you with this mystery.

If only you had realized that "this is not the right book" when you copypasted that antivax crap into your Dad's book.

All I wrote in the book is that vaccines will not be mandated because no one knows how a child will react, and no doctor would ever want to assume that responsibility should something go terribly wrong. Based on the principles, parents will be able to make an informed choice based on the latest information. I'm sorry that you don't like what I wrote but it doesn't change the principles one iota. You're just picking on me because you don't like his claim about the eyes. Let it go But.

[But]

What's going on with those space probes?

[But]

[peacegirl]

You call this good science?

December 29, 2017

Is the European Medical Agency Experimenting on Babies with the Meningitis Vaccine Only Approved for Age 10 and Above?

Bexsero vaccine

by Christina England
Health Impact News

In 2016, we published an article on the dangers of the meningitis B vaccination, Bexsero, titled, Are Ineffective New Meningitis B Vaccines Causing Harm to Children?

At the time of publication, according to the FDA product information leaflet, the vaccine had in fact only been approved for children over the age of ten.

Despite, this fact however, in the UK, the meningitis B vaccine Bexsero was being administered to infants as young as 2 months, despite the fact that we could find no evidence to support that this vaccine was safe to be administered to babies.

continued at: Is the European Medical Agency Experimenting on Babies with the Meningitis Vaccine Only Approved for Age 10 and Above?

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

You call this good science?

December 29, 2017

Is the European Medical Agency Experimenting on Babies with the Meningitis Vaccine Only Approved for Age 10 and Above?

Bexsero vaccine

by Christina England
Health Impact News

In 2016, we published an article on the dangers of the meningitis B vaccination, Bexsero, titled, Are Ineffective New Meningitis B Vaccines Causing Harm to Children?

At the time of publication, according to the FDA product information leaflet, the vaccine had in fact only been approved for children over the age of ten.

Despite, this fact however, in the UK, the meningitis B vaccine Bexsero was being administered to infants as young as 2 months, despite the fact that we could find no evidence to support that this vaccine was safe to be administered to babies.

continued at: Is the European Medical Agency Experimenting on Babies with the Meningitis Vaccine Only Approved for Age 10 and Above?

Uh, no, I call that fundamental failure to understand the very basics of regulatory systems.

peacegirl, did you do any due diligence here? For example, did you look for the EMA EPAR for Bexsero? Did you read it? What did it say? How does the actual content of the regulatory document comport with what your source says?

peacegirl, what is the difference between the FDA and the EMA?

[Stephen Maturin]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

All I wrote in the book is that vaccines will not be mandated . . . .

They're not "mandated" now.

Oh, and for our countless throngs of newcomers, "the book" Old Janis is talking about is her fraudulent Corrupted Text, which is fraudulent, corrupted, and bears no genuine resemblance to the true writings of Seymour Lessans.

show spoiler

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Uh, no, I call that fundamental failure to understand the very basics of regulatory systems.

peacegirl, did you do any due diligence here? For example, did you look for the EMA EPAR for Bexsero? Did you read it? What did it say? How does the actual content of the regulatory document comport with what your source says?

peacegirl, what is the difference between the FDA and the EMA?

Doctors divided on meningitis B vaccine

<snip>

Dr. Mark Sawyer, an infectious disease specialist at Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego who has helped set national vaccination policy, said the meningitis decision is more nuanced than it is for more routine vaccinations that have been around for decades.

<snip>

Meanwhile, Sawyer said newer vaccines on the market lack comprehensive evidence on safety and effectiveness, compared with vaccines that have been administered to tens of millions of people over decades.

Doctors divided on merits, risks of meningitis B vaccine - The San Diego Union-Tribune

[But]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Meanwhile, Sawyer said newer vaccines on the market lack comprehensive evidence on safety and effectiveness, compared with vaccines that have been administered to tens of millions of people over decades.

So there is more data about vaccines that have been used for decades, compared with vaccines that are new on the market?

Holy Shit

[Stephen Maturin]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Doctors divided on meningitis B vaccine

<snip>

Dr. Mark Sawyer, an infectious disease specialist at Rady Children’s Hospital San Diego who has helped set national vaccination policy, said the meningitis decision is more nuanced than it is for more routine vaccinations that have been around for decades.

<snip>

Meanwhile, Sawyer said newer vaccines on the market lack comprehensive evidence on safety and effectiveness, compared with vaccines that have been administered to tens of millions of people over decades.

Doctors divided on merits, risks of meningitis B vaccine - The San Diego Union-Tribune

So then, your answers to Chuck's questions are as follows:

1. No, you did not do any due diligence.

2. No, you did you look for the European Medical Agency EPAR for Bexsero.

3. No, you did not read the EMA EPAR for Bexsero, seeing has how you never even looked for it and all.

4. You don't know what the EMA EPAR for Bexsero says, since you never read or even looked for it.

5. You cannot say how the actual content of the regulatory document comports with what child murder advocate Christina England says, because you have precisely zero knowledge regarding the document's contents.

6. You have no idea whatsoever what the difference is between the FDA and the EMA.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

You call this good science?

December 29, 2017

Is the European Medical Agency Experimenting on Babies with the Meningitis Vaccine Only Approved for Age 10 and Above?

Bexsero vaccine

by Christina England
Health Impact News

In 2016, we published an article on the dangers of the meningitis B vaccination, Bexsero, titled, Are Ineffective New Meningitis B Vaccines Causing Harm to Children?

At the time of publication, according to the FDA product information leaflet, the vaccine had in fact only been approved for children over the age of ten.

Despite, this fact however, in the UK, the meningitis B vaccine Bexsero was being administered to infants as young as 2 months, despite the fact that we could find no evidence to support that this vaccine was safe to be administered to babies.

continued at: Is the European Medical Agency Experimenting on Babies with the Meningitis Vaccine Only Approved for Age 10 and Above?

peacegirl, did you do any due diligence here? For example, did you look for the EMA EPAR for Bexsero? Did you read it? What did it say? How does the actual content of the regulatory document comport with what your source says?

peacegirl, what is the difference between the FDA and the EMA?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

peacegirl, did you do any due diligence here? For example, did you look for the EMA EPAR for Bexsero? Did you read it? What did it say? How does the actual content of the regulatory document comport with what your source says?

peacegirl, what is the difference between the FDA and the EMA?

She felt the studies done by the EMA on infants were inadequate, hence she called it experimentation. Moreover, the manufacturer stated in the insert that the safety of this vaccine could not be established on children under 10.

What are the main differences between the FDA and the EMA?

[But]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

She felt the studies done by the EMA on infants were inadequate

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

She felt the studies done by the EMA on infants were inadequate, hence she called it experimentation.

What are the main differences between the FDA and the EMA?

peacegirl, did you read your link before you wrote your comment? Your link correctly points out that the EMA does not perform clinical trials. (Neither does the FDA, for that matter - so it is weird that they suggest this is a difference between the EMA and FDA.)

Also, peacegirl, did you do any due diligence here? For example, your source here - which is obviously just the first thing you found on Google - says that "[t]he EMA does not grant marketing approvals. It only gives scientific opinions and is not responsible for granting or revoking marketing authorizations." peacegirl, would you be surprised to learn that is totally wrong? One does not get centralised authorisation without EMA.

Anyway, peacegirl, getting back to your due diligence. Did you look for the EMA EPAR for Bexsero? Did you read it? What did it say? How does the actual content of the regulatory document comport with what your source says?

Moreover, the manufacturer stated in the insert that the safety of this vaccine could not be established on children under 10.

peacegirl, are you sure? What due diligence did you do? What facts and data support this statement? Did you read the label and package leaflet? I'll give you a hint - it's in Annex III of the EPAR.

peacegirl, do you understand that the EMA and FDA are different agencies?

[ChuckF]

I often work with folks who are new to the industry or the clinical development side of it, and aren't really familiar with the processes and pathways for drug development and approval. It's not very intuitive and there are quite a number of things to internalize. But I have found that a person of ordinary intelligence can get a good handle on the broad strokes of how it works in about three months.

With that in mind: peacegirl, I think if you tried, you might be able to understand the very basics of drug development, approval, and marketing in about a year. If you were willing to try.

I'm not talking about your ignorant woo, where you just mindlessly post the first thing you see on Google without even reading it. I'm talking about like the actual, real ways that clinical trials are done (with ethics approval, for example), data is collected and evaluated, and adverse events are reported and monitored.

You would have to do some reading and re-reading, and would have to remember things that you have previously read. Sometimes you might have to consult other documents and do research beyond typing stupid shit into a Facebook search bar and uncritically accepting whatever comes back. You wouldn't have to rely on silly Holocaust deniers, but also most of the information is in written words rather than recorded in some retarded Youtube video. And most of those words are in long documents and not on some goofy huckster homeopathy/anal bleach websites. But it's out there, and if you try, you could probably understand a good chunk of it.

Do you have any interest in trying, peacegirl?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

I often work with folks who are new to the industry or the clinical development side of it, and aren't really familiar with the processes and pathways for drug development and approval. It's not very intuitive and there are quite a number of things to internalize. But I have found that a person of ordinary intelligence can get a good handle on the broad strokes of how it works in about three months.

With that in mind: peacegirl, I think if you tried, you might be able to understand the very basics of drug development, approval, and marketing in about a year. If you were willing to try.

I'm not talking about your ignorant woo, where you just mindlessly post the first thing you see on Google without even reading it. I'm talking about like the actual, real ways that clinical trials are done (with ethics approval, for example), data is collected and evaluated, and adverse events are reported and monitored.

You would have to do some reading and re-reading, and would have to remember things that you have previously read. Sometimes you might have to consult other documents and do research beyond typing stupid shit into a Facebook search bar and uncritically accepting whatever comes back. You wouldn't have to rely on silly Holocaust deniers, but also most of the information is in written words rather than recorded in some retarded Youtube video. And most of those words are in long documents and not on some goofy huckster homeopathy/anal bleach websites. But it's out there, and if you try, you could probably understand a good chunk of it.

Do you have any interest in trying, peacegirl?

Yo have too much ego involved in this debate for anything you say to be taken at face value. I believe you are well-versed in certain areas, but you take the privilege of extending the scope of your knowledge and expertise beyond your capabilities. This is not about bleach enemas Chuck. Right there you show your intention to conflate two separate things in order to make your case. But it doesn’t fly Chuck except for those who want to believe science can do no wrong! You will never admit the risks of certain vaccines as a single vaccine or in combination, which may pose an unacceptable risk. If you had any credibility with me, you have lost it due to your logical fallacies.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_(logic)

[ChuckF]

Fair enough, peacegirl - you are not interested in trying. I didn't think you would be. You never have been before.

Anyway, peacegirl, getting back to your due diligence. Did you look for the EMA EPAR for Bexsero? Did you read it? What did it say? How does the actual content of the regulatory document comport with what your source says?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Fair enough, peacegirl - you are not interested in trying. I didn't think you would be. You never have been before.

Anyway, peacegirl, getting back to your due diligence. Did you look for the EMA EPAR for Bexsero? Did you read it? What did it say? How does the actual content of the regulatory document comport with what your source says?

Your diversionary methods aren't working. I will say one last time in response to your post, the manufacturer stated in the insert that the vaccine is approved for 10 years old and up. Further, the studies done in the UK were so small, they could not be a true sampling of the risk/benefit analysis. Isn't that what you depend on? Ugh!

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I notice it's always the same people thanking you for your amazing knowledge. What a crock of *e#$*!. Your diversionary methods aren't working. Get off your high horse. I will say one last time in response to your post, the manufacturer stated in the insert that they could only vouch for 10 years old and up. I will not be quizzed by you. Further, the studies done in the UK were so small, they could not be a true sampling of the risk/benefit analysis. Isn't that what you depend on? Ugh!

Hm, ok, peacegirl. I don't see how this is really "diversionary" as it directly addresses the exact points raised by the source that you cited. Anyway:

Which studies were too small? What were the sample sizes? What were the results? What are the statistical effects of the sample size on the results? What was the risk/benefit analysis used by EMA? How was that different from the analysis applied by FDA? What is an adequate sample size?

peacegirl, I will give you a hint: the EMA EPAR for Bexsero would be a great place to find the answers to these basic questions. It is kind of the very first place someone would look if they were doing their due diligence.

peacegirl, do you understand that the FDA and EMA are different agencies?

peacegirl, maybe now would be a good time for you to apply some of that critical analysis you talk so much about. Using your knowledge of the biologics regulatory schemes and the meningococcal disease vaccine ecosystems in the US and EU, why might the US Bexsero label be different from the EU Bexsero label? The EMA EPAR and FDA BLA approval would be great starting points for your due diligence, peacegirl.

Are you able to find them, peacegirl?

If this is too difficult for you, let me know - I can just give you the answer.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Fair enough, peacegirl - you are not interested in trying. I didn't think you would be. You never have been before.

Anyway, peacegirl, getting back to your due diligence. Did you look for the EMA EPAR for Bexsero? Did you read it? What did it say? How does the actual content of the regulatory document comport with what your source says?

Her main concern in this article had to do with the high aluminum content given to infants, along with other ingredients not mentioned, such as e.coli.

Your diversionary methods aren't working. I will say one last time in response to your post, the manufacturer stated in the insert that they could only vouch for 10 years old and up. Further, the studies done in the UK were so small, they could not be a true sampling of the risk/benefit analysis. Isn't that what you depend on? Ugh!

Originally Posted by Chuck

Hm, ok, peacegirl. I don't see how this is really "diversionary" as it directly addresses the exact points raised by the source that you cited. Anyway:

Which studies were too small? What were the sample sizes? What were the results? What are the statistical effects of the sample size on the results? What was the risk/benefit analysis used by EMA? How was that different from the analysis applied by FDA? What is an adequate sample size?
peacegirl, I will give you a hint: the EMA EPAR for Bexsero would be a great place to find the answers to these basic questions. It is kind of the very first place someone would look if they were doing their due diligence.

http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/...C500216767.pdf

Originally Posted by Chuck

peacegirl, do you understand that the FDA and EMA are different agencies?

What are the main differences between the FDA and the EMA?

Originally Posted by Chuck

peacegirl, maybe now would be a good time for you to apply some of that critical analysis you talk so much about. Using your knowledge of the biologics regulatory schemes and the meningococcal disease vaccine ecosystems in the US and EU, why might the US Bexsero label be different from the EU Bexsero label? The EMA EPAR and FDA BLA approval would be great starting points for your due diligence, peacegirl.

Are you able to find them, peacegirl? If this is too difficult for you, let me know - I can just give you the answer.

Please don't talk to me about due diligence.

Parents' shocking video of baby 'suffering up to 14 seizures a day' after getting the Meningitis B vaccination - Mirror Online

http://www.pni.org/psychopharmacolog...BlindNeppe.pdf