A revolution in thought

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Of course I do not need your permission to answer questions.

But anyway, So long, peacegirl! See you in a few hours.

No one said you needed my permission. You are self-appointed to be the new steward, are you not? I am sure you will weasel yourself out of this one too. I hope you like your new appointment. All questions regarding this discovery should be directed to Chuck!

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

No one said you needed my permission. You are self-appointed to be the new steward, are you not?

peacegirl, I am not the new steward; I am the True Steward, because there was no former steward - only a Corruptor and your Corrupted Text.

I am sure you will weasel yourself out of this one too. I hope you like your new appointment. All questions regarding this discovery should be directed to Chuck!

Agreed. I am pleased to answer all questions regarding the Authentic Text or the rejection of the Corrupted Text.

[Florence Jellem]

Oh, boy, boys, it looks like we are going to have the parties after all! This will be a nice change of pace for Flo, whose main social outlet these days is playing Bingo with the broads at the VFW community center.

There will be three parties: Party Like It’s 1999 (Page 1999), The Authentic Page 2000 Party (as opposed to the Corrupted version) and 2001: A Space-Case Oddity (for page 2001, of course).

Just to be on the safe side, I’ve given each subclass of Homo-sexuals its own party page: I-Homos for page 1999, G-Homos for page 2000 and E-Homos for page 2001 (provided that they are still around by then and have not been compelled of their own free will to fall by the wayside in due course).

I wish to thank ChuckF for his True Stewardship of the Authentic Text. I am sure that the Authentic Text still maintains the author’s original astute observations on the mathematical impossibility of married couples desiring to share the same bed, whereas peacegirl rewrote that passage to say something completely different, as can easily be ascertained by a side-by-side comparison of the passages. Why she corrupted her father’s work is anyone’s guess. Can it be she secretly resents Lessans and seeks to ruin his reputation?

#TrueStewardship

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I cannot move on unless you read Chapter One.

That is such a pathetic excuse because we all know that you really mean that we must read it, regurgitate it back to you to prove that we understand, and agree with everything written. You and Lessans have no room for those who disagree with the sacred text, and you have deemed everyone who disagreed as unworthy to receive the knowledge you claim is there. In truth you're not here to reveal anything because you have nothing to reveal, it's all a scam to get money out of the unsuspecting suckers, and to bask in the abuse to feed your martyr complex.

[Florence Jellem]

PARTY LIKE IT’S 1999!

Coming Soon!

A balls- and tits-out bacchanal to commemorate the eve of the end of the Second Millennium of the stupidest thread in the history of the Internets. Get toasted, get basted, get wasted! Dance, frolic, fall in love with that lucky someone’s genitals! Ask yourself: What did I do to deserve this thread? Then get roaring drunk. Note: If you are a Homo, only I-Homos will be permitted to attend this party. There will be a bouncer at the portal. Please have your Federal Homo Classification Card ready for flashlight inspection. When the bouncer turns off the flashlight, the molecules of light that left it will immediately cease to exist, as peacegirl has explained in the past.

More leaflets to follow.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

peacegirl, I am not the new steward; I am the True Steward, because there was no former steward - only a Corruptor and your Corrupted Text.

Agreed. I am pleased to answer all questions regarding the Authentic Text or the rejection of the Corrupted Text.

You are an imposter. You are not a steward (new, true, or otherwise) of anything. I thought you were joking at first but I actually think you are deluded enough to believe your own bullshit.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lTi9qDJziAM

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

You are an imposter. You are not a steward (new, true, or otherwise) of anything.

Of course I compelled of my own free will to be the #TrueSteward of the Authentic Text, peacegirl. It is mathematical and undeniable: 3 is 6 as 4 is to 8 as I am the True Steward. This is well understood here. That you reject my #TrueStewardship as you reject the Authentic Text in favor of your Corrupted Text that you hawk online ($41.00!!!) does not surprise anyone; but neither does it change the undeniable, mathematical fact of that I am the #TrueSteward.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Of course I compelled of my own free will to be the #TrueSteward of the Authentic Text, peacegirl. It is mathematical and undeniable: 3 is 6 as 4 is to 8 as I am the True Steward. This is well understood here. That you reject my #TrueStewardship as you reject the Authentic Text in favor of your Corrupted Text that you hawk online ($41.00!!!) does not surprise anyone; but neither does it change the undeniable, mathematical fact of that I am the #TrueSteward.

Repeat some more. You are an imposter!
#FalseSteward

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Repeat some more.

peacegirl, I am and have always been the #TrueSteward of the Authentic Text, which you reject and do not recognize. My #TrueStewardship was hidden behind the door marked ChuckF is the True Steward of the Authentic Text. This is mathematical and undeniable, notwithstanding the impotent protests of Corruptors like you. Of course you have the right of way to continue hawking your Corrupted Text for money; but as for me and mine, we shall interpret the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime. We reject your Corrupted Text.

#TrueStewardship

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Imposter

peacegirl, I am and have always been the #TrueSteward of the Authentic Text, which you reject and do not recognize. My #TrueStewardship was hidden behind the door marked ChuckF is the True Steward of the Authentic Text. This is mathematical and undeniable, notwithstanding the impotent protests of Corruptors like you. Of course you have the right of way to continue hawking your Corrupted Text for money; but as for me and mine, we shall interpret the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime. We reject your Corrupted Text.

#TrueStewardship

#FalseStewardship

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

#FalseStewardship

Yes, peacegirl, that is exactly the kind of impotent protest I mean.

[Dragar]

peacegirl, why do you reject ChuckF as the true steward of Lessans' text? You cannot deny his astute (and therefore mathematical) observations.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Dragar

peacegirl, why do you reject ChuckF as the true steward of Lessans' text? You cannot deny his astute (and therefore mathematical) observations.

Because he's

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Imposter

Yes, peacegirl, that is exactly the kind of impotent protest I mean.

There's nothing left to do but put you on ignore.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Because he's

peacegirl, you should be ashamed talking about the Author of the Authentic Text that way, though I am unsurprised to see you deny the Authentic Text yet again. I agree with you that your Corrupted Text is an incoherent pile of nonsense babble and half-formed jibberish that inevitably leads the reader to conclude that its writer labors under any number of rather grave misunderstandings of the natural world, and perhaps somewhat more seriously, some form of mental illness. However, we must not mistake your Corrupted Text for the Authentic Text, and we must keep in mind that this is a product of your Corruption. Your Corrupted Text is corrupt, and to be rejected.

Originally Posted by peacegirl

There's nothing left to do but put you on ignore.

peacegirl, you have that right of way. We shall see how long it lasts this time - you've indicated the same thing several times over the past few days, never holding out for more than a day.

But peacegirl, it is important that you understand that putting me on ignore is simply another form of impotent protest. It has precisely one effect: you will no longer be able to see what I post. Placing me on ignore - or, more likely, simply lying about placing me on ignore- will not prevent others from understanding that I am the #TrueSteward of the Authentic Text. It will not make your Corrupted Text less Corrupt. It will not make you any less a Corruptor hawking your Corrupted Text online.

It will simply remove you from the conversation regarding the Authentic Text, its content, and meaning.

In my view, that is wholly appropriate, given your rejection and Corruption of the Authentic Text.

So long, peacegirl. Until we meet again in a couple hours or whenever you give up your latest lie.

[Stephen Maturin]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

There's nothing left to do but put you on ignore.

Pretend Ignore is mother's milk to ChuckF, the True Steward of the Authentic Text and Scourge of the Corrupted Text.

#TrueStewardship

[Florence Jellem]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

There's nothing left to do but put you on ignore.

#TrueStewardship

vs.

#PretendIgnoreIsland

[Stephen Maturin]

[Florence Jellem]

There will be juicy cutlets served at …




THE AUTHENTIC* PAGE 2000 PARTY

Yes, there will be juicy cutlets, and also precious, precious cutlets to bite. These are the authentic cutlets of #TrueStewardship, not the corrupted cutlets of #PretendIgnoreIsland. There will also be sausages. But remember, among the Homo-sexual community, only G-Homos will be allowed to attend this party and partake of sausages.

Coming soon! Just 13 pages away! Make your reservations! After the party is over, you can drunkenly flop into bed with your Significant Other’s Genitals, unless you are married, in which case that will be mathematically impossible.

*As opposed to the sadly corrupted party.

[Dragar]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Because he's

You just say that because you reject his true stewardship and don't understand the Authentic Text. If you truly understood what your father wrote, you wouldn't say this.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Dragar

You just say that because you reject his true stewardship and don't understand the Authentic Text. If you truly understood what your father wrote, you wouldn't say this.

You're absolutely right Dragar.

[Stephen Maturin]

Originally Posted by Dragar

You just say that because you reject his true stewardship and don't understand the Authentic Text.

This is absolutely true. Spot on, undeniable, mathematical and scientific, one might go so far as to say.

Remember when peacegirl wrote that we can always hear an airplane before we can see it because she erroneously believed that's what her father was saying? #Sad

One can only imagine the heartbreak the Messiah must have felt upon realizing the full extent of his dimwitted child's intellectual deficiencies, dishonesty, and "the world owes me a living" entitlement mentality.

Conversely, one can only imagine how overjoyed the Messiah would be to discover that the Authentic Text written and published during His lifetime now has a True Steward, a champion willing and able to defend the Authentic Text against all depredations, no matter how ghastly.

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by Florence Jellem

THE AUTHENTIC* PAGE 2000 PARTY[/CENTER]

May I bring fireworks?

London Fireworks 2017 - New Years Eve Fireworks...

And noisemakers? and mud?

Mud BOGG February 2016 TEXAS NOISE MAKERS MUD...

[GdB]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I read them. We are not in disagreement.

You did not clearly react on my statement:

But you realise this is exactly what compatibilism is saying?

Just to show you:

1. You are opposing compatibilism.
2. I describe your viewpoint, translating a few concepts in your direction (e.g. compatbilist free will => volition)
3. However, doing this it shows that your viewpoint is compatibilism

Originally Posted by peacegirl

He is responsible for his actions in that he performed the action, no one else.

Yep. And that makes it morally relevant.

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Any thought process to determine which choice is the better one is limited to one's environment, experiences, and heredity and each and every moment only one choice is possible when there are meaningful differences.

Yep. But here you are using the categorical meaning of 'one choice is possible'. What you choose however is dependent on your capability to reflect the options for different actions, using your capability to foresee possible consequences of your actions, including its moral dimensions. But that shows that it is enough that you reflect on possible choices, which means we only need the hypothetical meaning of 'which choices are possible'. And, as said before, the hypothetical reading is not in contradiction with determinism.
Again: this makes you morally responsible for your actions.

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I cannot move on unless you read Chapter One.

I cannot move on until you have unambiguously presented your position. Therefore we need clear definitions, and consistent use of them.

[Vivisectus]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

You're absolutely right Dragar.

Look, we cannot move on until we are sure you have read and understood the authentic text. Read pages 1-70 and then explain to me, in your own words, why juicy cunts will make divorce and non-glandular homo-sexuality fall by the wayside.