Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Marketplace > The Sciences

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2012, 02:36 PM
ShottleBop's Avatar
ShottleBop ShottleBop is offline
(((The Spartacus of Anatevka)))
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Greater San Diego Area
Gender: Male
Posts: MVCXCI
Images: 13
Default Jerry Coyne Says Don't Depend on mtDNA

. . . every time, he says, every time, it will get you falling-down drunk, then drive away with your wallet, in your car.

"A new study of polar bears underlines the dangers of reconstructing evolution using mitochondrial DNA".

Even more cool: I own (and like) Why Evolution is True, but I never knew that Coyne had a blog by the same name. Now I can check it from time to time. FaceBook, you did a good thing today (Coyne's blogpost was linked to by another blogger that I follow)!
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
beyelzu (07-24-2012), chunksmediocrites (07-24-2012), Clutch Munny (07-24-2012), Crumb (07-24-2012), Janet (07-25-2012), Nullifidian (07-24-2012), Pan Narrans (07-25-2012), Stormlight (07-24-2012), Ymir's blood (07-24-2012)
  #2  
Old 07-24-2012, 04:05 PM
beyelzu's Avatar
beyelzu beyelzu is offline
simple country microbiologist hyperchicken
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: georgia
Posts: XMVDCXXXVIII
Blog Entries: 1
Images: 8
Default Re: Jerry Coyne Says Don't Depend on mtDNA

I took an evolutionary biology course last semester wherein we discussed how to use mtdna vs ndna as a method to determine introgression.

Quote:
Members of Mike Arnold’s lab have tested evolutionary hypotheses in a wide array of organisms – including fungi, plants and animals. In spite of the taxonomic diversity reflected in this work, there is a unifying theme. This theme is well described by the title of a 1954 Evolution paper authored by the plant evolutionary biologists, Edgar Anderson and Ledyard Stebbins – “Hybridization as an Evolutionary Stimulus”. Thus, our group has examined a range of phenomena associated with the process of gene exchange between organisms in nature. The data collected have derived from analyses of population genetics, phylogenetics, reproductive biology, pollinator behavior, eco-physiology, molecular evolution and, most recently, linkage/QTL mapping of fitness traits.
http://www.genetics.uga.edu/people_bio_arnold_m.html

I got the impression that people should already really understand this. Also Arnold pushed hard the idea that you need repeated studies over time to really understand if introgression is occurring.
__________________
:blowkiss: :beloved: :blowkiss: :beloved: :blowkiss: :steve: :blowkiss: :beloved: :blowkiss: :beloved: :blowkiss:
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2012, 07:29 PM
fragment's Avatar
fragment fragment is offline
mesospheric bore
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Zealand
Gender: Male
Posts: VMCDXLIV
Blog Entries: 8
Images: 143
Default Re: Jerry Coyne Says Don't Depend on mtDNA

Thanks! Cool stuff. I've wondered before if the use of plastid DNA - which is widespread in plant evol papers I've read - might generate inaccurate pictures. DNA-based phylogenies have redrawn large swathes of plant systematics in the last decade or so, I wonder how much of that has been based on questionable plastid-based studies?
__________________
Avatar source CC BY-SA
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Marketplace > The Sciences


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.42879 seconds with 13 queries