Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Amphitheater > The Atrium

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2007, 02:05 AM
256 colors 256 colors is offline
Karma is Rael
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paradise Park
Gender: Bender
Posts: DCVIII
News Even more church-state activism for me now

Hi :ff:! I got some great news today and I thought I would share it with you all.

I was elected to the National Advisory Council of Americans United for Separation of Church and State! I am so pleased and honored. I'm not really all that "good" at church-state stuff, I mean, I can research things online to answer questions in email or on forums, but I'm not so hot "off the cuff" if someone asks me church-state questions in real life. I recently spoke on behalf of AU at a meeting of the Secular Student Alliance at University of Delaware, and the students asked me things that I couldn't just answer off the top of my head.

When AU first told me I had been nominated, I thought that I wasn't really qualified for the position, which is a 3-year term on AU's NAC. But when they sent me the list of requirements for NAC members, I realized that I was already engaged in the activities that NAC members are supposed to do: namely, searching for and reporting church-state violations to AU's national office; keeping abreast of news stories and issues, and speaking out in my local paper on the op/ed page when church-state issues arise. So I accepted the nomination, and I got my letter today, informing me that I was elected to the NAC.

So, what that means for :ff: is that when I lurk here I will be on the lookout for threads about church-state issues. If any of you are ever so inclined, feel free to PM me to alert me to important threads or news stories. And if any of you ever witness a church-state violation in your school, town, or state, contact me! I will be glad to help.

This is some pretty cool news for me and I am really excited about it, I hope that I am sharing my joy in the correct forum. I hope I do a good job for Americans United.

Any of you can ask me anything about AU or church-state separation; if I don't know the answer, I will find out for you. I remain at your service and I rely on people like you for inspiration and information. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-2007, 02:09 AM
godfry n. glad's Avatar
godfry n. glad godfry n. glad is offline
rude, crude, lewd, and unsophisticated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Puddle City, Cascadia
Gender: Male
Posts: XXMMCMXII
Images: 12
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

Get rid of anything and everything tainted with the "Faith-Based Initiatives".
__________________
:wcat: :ecat:
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
256 colors (12-11-2007)
  #3  
Old 12-11-2007, 02:18 AM
Naru's Avatar
Naru Naru is offline
Strabismic Ungulate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: college
Gender: Male
Posts: MVCMXXXVII
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

Congratulations, ELGS.
__________________
:cookiemonster:
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
256 colors (12-11-2007)
  #4  
Old 12-11-2007, 02:25 AM
256 colors 256 colors is offline
Karma is Rael
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paradise Park
Gender: Bender
Posts: DCVIII
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

Quote:
Originally Posted by godfry n. glad View Post
Get rid of anything and everything tainted with the "Faith-Based Initiatives".
Oh man, the FBCI is a personal pet peeve of mine, and Americans United filed an amicus brief in the recent Supreme Court case that did not end well for our side.

See here: Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation was a United States Supreme Court case which ruled on June 25, 2007 by a 5-4 decision that taxpayers do not have the right to challenge the constitutionality of expenditures by the executive branch of the government.
At question was whether taxpayers have the right to challenge the existence of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.[1] The case centered on three Supreme Court precedents: Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968), Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589 (1988), and Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State, 454 U.S. 464 (1982). Oral arguments were heard February 28, 2007.
I actually pulled my kids out of school and took them to DC on February 28 to show my support for the groups that filed this suit. We lost. I do not quite know what this means for the future of lawsuits about abuses of the faith-based funding system. In my work with both Americans United and other groups, I have seen testimony from individuals who say that they were required to participate in religious services in order to receive assistance from some groups that receive FBCI funds.

Americans United, FFRF, the American Humanist Association, and other secular groups are fighting hard to tackle the faith-based funding problem. These groups would benefit from your membership dollars to support their work in the legal and legislative forefront. If you need more info about the benefits of membership in any such organization, please ask, I am a member of almost all of them. Americans United is strictly a church-state group, not an "atheist group," and its legal department has been very proactive in working on church-state issues and cases. Hey, if any of you guys happen to join any of these groups, tell them that Janice Rael sent you. That would make my day!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2007, 02:49 AM
D. Scarlatti's Avatar
D. Scarlatti D. Scarlatti is offline
Babby Police
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: XMMMDLVIII
Images: 3
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
At question was whether taxpayers have the right to challenge the existence of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives.
Who writes this stuff. Article III standing isn't a "right"; it has to do with whether the Supreme Court, and by extension the lower federal courts, are empowered to hear a dispute involving parties whose status as litigants don't meet the "cases or controversies" requirement of Article III.

And it wasn't the "existence" of the White House office that was challenged. The question revolved on whether the plaintiffs, if they did have standing, could reach the activities of the Executive generally, since the precedent -- Flast -- addressed acts of Congress.

Flast, incidentally, remains intact. And if it's true that some recipients of government dough are required as a precondition to swear sectarian allegiance, then there are other means of challenging such preconditions.
__________________
My dwarves will refudiate.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
256 colors (12-11-2007)
  #6  
Old 12-11-2007, 02:53 AM
freemonkey's Avatar
freemonkey freemonkey is offline
professional left-winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: VMCCLX
Images: 29
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

This is great news, ELGS. Congratulations. You'll do a great job.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
256 colors (12-11-2007)
  #7  
Old 12-11-2007, 03:00 AM
Crumb's Avatar
Crumb Crumb is offline
Adequately Crumbulent
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
Posts: LXMMCDVIII
Blog Entries: 22
Images: 355
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

You should edit the article, DS and fix it. :yup:

ELGS: Congrats! :shake: I'm sure you'll do great! Do you know if AU or any other organization has information available on presidential or other political candidates and their views and histories regarding CSS issues?
__________________
:joecool2: :cascadia: :ROR: :portland: :joecool2:
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
256 colors (12-11-2007)
  #8  
Old 12-11-2007, 03:05 AM
D. Scarlatti's Avatar
D. Scarlatti D. Scarlatti is offline
Babby Police
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: XMMMDLVIII
Images: 3
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

I couldn't be bothered. There's enough intelligent commentary on Hein and other cases that Wikipedia should be anybody's last resort. For example. Wikipedia is maintained by amateurs. It's handy, but frequently misleading.
__________________
My dwarves will refudiate.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Crumb (12-11-2007)
  #9  
Old 12-11-2007, 03:06 AM
Crumb's Avatar
Crumb Crumb is offline
Adequately Crumbulent
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
Posts: LXMMCDVIII
Blog Entries: 22
Images: 355
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

But who's ever heard of ... ( oops heh )... those other places? :chin: Everyone knows Wikipedia.
__________________
:joecool2: :cascadia: :ROR: :portland: :joecool2:

Last edited by Crumb; 12-11-2007 at 03:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2007, 05:56 AM
256 colors 256 colors is offline
Karma is Rael
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paradise Park
Gender: Bender
Posts: DCVIII
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumb View Post
You should edit the article, DS and fix it. :yup:

ELGS: Congrats! :shake: I'm sure you'll do great! Do you know if AU or any other organization has information available on presidential or other political candidates and their views and histories regarding CSS issues?
Thanks, Crumb!

Americans United just had a blog story about the current candidates and their church-state stances: Candidates And Scripture: Bumping Into God On The Campaign Trail.

The Secular Coalition for America has a Congressional Scorecard and a newly-released Full report: 2007 Year-End Report on the 110th Congress.

The Interfaith Alliance has an Election Year Resources guide, but it doesn't report on candidates.

The Secular Web :eek: has an article by Frank Steiner called The Religious Beliefs Of Our Presidents, the complete version of this article is a book, Barnes & Noble.com - Books: Religious Beliefs of Our Presidents ...; it is an old book but B&N has some used copies for sale.

Hope this helps!
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Crumb (12-11-2007)
  #11  
Old 12-11-2007, 04:49 PM
maddog maddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: MMMXXXIII
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

Quote:
Originally Posted by EverLastingGodStopper View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by godfry n. glad View Post
Get rid of anything and everything tainted with the "Faith-Based Initiatives".
Oh man, the FBCI is a personal pet peeve of mine, and Americans United filed an amicus brief in the recent Supreme Court case that did not end well for our side.

I actually pulled my kids out of school and took them to DC on February 28 to show my support for the groups that filed this suit. We lost. I do not quite know what this means for the future of lawsuits about abuses of the faith-based funding system. In my work with both Americans United and other groups, I have seen testimony from individuals who say that they were required to participate in religious services in order to receive assistance from some groups that receive FBCI funds.

Americans United, FFRF, the American Humanist Association, and other secular groups are fighting hard to tackle the faith-based funding problem. These groups would benefit from your membership dollars to support their work in the legal and legislative forefront. If you need more info about the benefits of membership in any such organization, please ask, I am a member of almost all of them. Americans United is strictly a church-state group, not an "atheist group," and its legal department has been very proactive in working on church-state issues and cases. Hey, if any of you guys happen to join any of these groups, tell them that Janice Rael sent you. That would make my day!
Here's part of the problem right here, as shown by the highligted phrase ... The ONLY reason to call something "faith-based" is to try to put it over euphemistically on the public as something other than what it *IS* -- which is "religious." People should stop letting the theocrats subvert and coopt language in this way. Stop saying "faith-based" -- the word is "religious."

#1511
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
godfry n. glad (12-11-2007)
  #12  
Old 12-11-2007, 07:05 PM
godfry n. glad's Avatar
godfry n. glad godfry n. glad is offline
rude, crude, lewd, and unsophisticated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Puddle City, Cascadia
Gender: Male
Posts: XXMMCMXII
Images: 12
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

Ramen.

I'd be willing to wager that there's some exclusivity in which faiths get access to "faith-based" initiative monies, too.

Next up....Faith-based defense.
__________________
:wcat: :ecat:
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-11-2007, 07:53 PM
Sock Puppet's Avatar
Sock Puppet Sock Puppet is offline
Just keep m'nose clean, egg, chips & beans, I'm always full of steam
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: so far out, I'm too far in
Gender: Bender
Posts: XMVDCCCXXIII
Blog Entries: 7
Images: 120
Default Re: Even more church-state activism for me now

Well, of course. We can't be calling infidels (godless communists, Moozlums, face-to-face dancers, et al.) "faith-based," now can we?
__________________
"Her eyes in certain light were violet, and all her teeth were even. That's a rare, fair feature: even teeth. She smiled to excess, but she chewed with real distinction." - Eleanor of Aquitaine

:sockpuppet:...........
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Amphitheater > The Atrium


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 1.19212 seconds with 13 queries