A revolution in thought

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Ciao, peacegirl See you at the next forum.

I'm telling you right now, you will be banned in a moderated forum. You will have to change your ways so drastically that I don't think you will be able to.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I'm telling you right now, you will be banned in a moderated forum. You will have to change your ways so drastically that I don't think you will be able to.

Let's find out! See you there Should I be ChuckF or someone else? Your call.

By the way, peacegirl, have you ever been banned from a moderated forum? Just curious!

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Let's find out! See you there Should I be ChuckF or someone else? Your call.

.

I could care less chuck. One thing is for sure: your shenanigans will not be tolerated, and as a result you may actually learn something!

[ChuckF]

peacegirl, I am compelled of my own free will to bring the Authentic Text to a world in need!

If it's all the same to you maybe I'll come up with a new character at our forum. I already have a few ideas. I can't wait

Because I mean it's definitely not like you're just lying again and will never actually leave here, amirite. lol of course it is.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Let's find out! See you there Should I be ChuckF or someone else? Your call.

I could care less chuck. Stop playing with me. One thing is for sure: your shenanigans will not be tolerated in a moderated forum. As a result, you may actually learn something!

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

peacegirl, I am compelled of my own free will to bring the Authentic Text to a world in need!

If it's all the same to you maybe I'll come up with a new character at our forum. I already have a few ideas. I can't wait

Because I mean it's definitely not like you're just lying again and will never actually leave here, amirite. lol of course it is.

You continue to humor me, but I will get the last laugh. You just wait and see.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I could care less chuck. Stop playing with me.

No thanks, peacegirl. I reject your advance blame. I'll continue to post whatever I want.

You could always just use the ignore feature and ignore me, like you've lied about doing so many times.

But I know you can't do that, peacegirl. You can't do that any more than you could leave here. That - together with your general slowness and apparently constant desire to advertise every single button you have that can be pushed - make this the most satisfying extended troll I have enjoyed in a very long time.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

No thanks, peacegirl. I reject your advance blame. I'll continue to post whatever I want.

Here maybe, but not where Im going.

Originally Posted by chuck

You could always just use the ignore feature and ignore me, like you've lied about doing so many times.

No, the ignore function doesn't help. I still see your nasty posts when I'm not yet signed in. I can't get away from you here.

Originally Posted by Chuck

But I know you can't do that, peacegirl. You can't do that any more than you could leave here. That - together with your general slowness and apparently constant desire to advertise every single button you have that can be pushed - make this the most satisfying extended troll I have enjoyed in a very long time.

I know you want to believe I can't leave, but you will see that I can when the time is right. I know how much you will miss me. Could this be love?

I think I love you by the Partridge Family with lyrics - YouTube

[ChuckF]

If you say so, peacegirl. But before you leave forever again (that's two or three times just today, I think!), considering hanging around until July 24, which is True Stewardship Day. I am working on a special surprise for the first anniversary of the realization that I am The True Steward of the Authentic Text! I hope it will come together.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

If you say so, peacegirl. But before you leave forever again (that's two or three times just today, I think!), considering hanging around until July 24, which is True Stewardship Day. I am working on a special surprise for the first anniversary of the realization that I am The True Steward of the Authentic Text! I hope it will come together.

Thanks for the invite, but I will make sure NOT to be here on that day as it will no doubt be another one of your shenanigans!

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

By the way, peacegirl, have you ever been banned from a moderated forum? Just curious!

I'm not sure about Peacegirl being banned from a forum, but there have been several where the thread was locked and Peacegirl just left when there was no place to post her nonsense. There was also one forum where members started agreeing with Peacegirl, and she left because she wasn't getting the abuse.

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Here maybe, but not where I'm going.

Where could you go where the members would not immediately turn on you?

[The Lone Ranger]

Originally Posted by peacegirl -- ad nauseum:
I could care less ...

Could you at least learn basic English?

The phrase you're searching for is "I couldn't care less". You're literally saying the opposite of what you think you mean.

[Angakuk]

I'm sure she does mean that she could not care less, but the truth is that she does care so "I could care less" is accidentally appropriate.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

Let's find out! See you there Should I be ChuckF or someone else? Your call.

By the way, peacegirl, have you ever been banned from a moderated forum? Just curious!

I would know who you are and I guarantee the mockery would end. You're going to have to work to find me. I would never give anyone (especially you) the website address.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger

Could you at least learn basic English?

The phrase you're searching for is "I couldn't care less". You're literally saying the opposite of what you think you mean.

Why "I could care less" is not as irrational or ungrammatical as you might think.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I would know who you are and I guarantee the mockery would end.

One way to find out - game on!

You're going to have to work to find me. I would never give anyone (especially you) the website address.

Ok, hawk your $41.00 Corrupted Text in secret.

All of this, just because you hate what your father wrote in the Authentic Text published in his lifetime.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

One way to find out - game on!

Ok, hawk your $41.00 Corrupted Text in secret.

All of this, just because you hate what your father wrote in the Authentic Text published in his lifetime.

You can keep up with the charade as long as you want, but you would never be tolerated in any other intelligent forum. The moderators would delete your posts so fast you wouldn't know what hit you.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

You can keep up with the charade as long as you want,

I know!

but you would never be tolerated in any other intelligent forum.

peacegirl, just because you hate and fear the Authentic Text does not mean that all thinking people reject it as you do!

The moderators would delete your posts so fast you wouldn't know what hit you.

Would they delete them like a glandular homo-sexual, or like the reason that 98% of homo-sexual intercourse comes into existence? I'm just thinking in terms of things you deleted when you were Corrupting the Authentic Text.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

I know!

peacegirl, just because you hate and fear the Authentic Text does not mean that all thinking people reject it as you do!

Would they delete them like a glandular homo-sexual, or like the reason that 98% of homo-sexual intercourse comes into existence? I'm just thinking in terms of things you deleted when you were Corrupting the Authentic Text.

They would see what you're trying to do, which is to turn a revolutionary work (that you have no understanding of) into something it's not just so you can be entertained. The comment he made about homosexuality was accurate in that the changes in the environment that may have caused one to become gay, will no longer be. This was not a statement about morality. It would not matter if he was wrong about this observation. But you, like others, are trying to take things out of context, which is why I took that one comment out. You cannot let it rest because this would ruin all your fun.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

They would see what you're trying to do, which is to turn a revolutionary work (that you have no understanding of) into something it's not just so you can be entertained.

peacegirl, what if they saw what you have done - turned a revolutionary work (that you have no understanding of) into a Corrupted Text just so you can hawk it for lucre online at $41.00 a pop?!

Originally Posted by peacegirl

The comment he made about homosexuality was accurate in that the changes in the environment that may have caused one to become gay, will no longer be.

It is not quite as good as proof by dog eyes but it is pretty close.

In any new forum I would definitely demand a thorough investigation of the Authentic Text's tripartite classification of homo-sexuals: glandular, environmental, and inherited.

I took that one comment out.

I know, peacegirl - you censored the Authentic Text. You did not even let the reader decide. You did not even give the Author a chance to defend himself. peacegirl, you Corrupted the Authentic Text.

[Vivisectus]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

It would not matter if he was wrong about this observation.

Hang on - but his observations are Astute, are they not? And an Astute Observation is a statement that requires nothing to support it's credibility. Its very Astuteness simply convinces us that it is correct.

Or were only some of his Observations Astute? And how can we tell which ones are and which are not? We would need some way of judging the veracity of the statements, to determine which Observations are Astute and which are not.

And if his Observations are all Astute, then there can be no question about this observation being wrong.

[The Lone Ranger]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Why "I could care less" is not as irrational or ungrammatical as you might think.

You were not being sarcastic, as you're perfectly aware.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger

You were not being sarcastic, as you're perfectly aware.

Whatever! This is off topic, which again, is part of th MO in here.

[The Lone Ranger]

My apologies. How silly of me to think that clear and accurate communication might have been a goal of yours.