A revolution in thought

[davidm]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Many thanks to this forum and Daniel Dennett for helping clarify the principles that I have been tirelessly trying to convey. I am very grateful.

Dennett is a compatibilist -- remember? The very thing you spent years telling spacemonkey could not possibly be true?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by davidm

Dennett is a compatibilist -- remember? The very thing you spent years telling spacemonkey could not possibly be true?

Nothing whatsoever to do with my reasoning. You’re too anxious to make me wrong for you to have any input that is worth it’s salt!

[davidm]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Nothing whatsoever to do with my reasoning. You’re too anxious to make me wrong for you to have any input that is worth it’s salt!

Got it. You did not realize, when you invoked his name, that Dennett is a compatibilist -- the very thing you spent years whining to spacemonkey could not possibly be true. So now you just write some content-free bullshit to try (unsuccessfully) to deflect from your utter ignorance.

Also, what are thanking this forum for? For proving that we don't see in real time?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by davidm

Got it. You did not realize, when you invoked his name, that Dennett is a compatibilist -- the very thing you spent years whining to spacemonkey could not possibly be true. So now you just write some content-free bullshit to try (unsuccessfully) to deflect from your utter ignorance.

Also, what are thanking this forum for? For proving that we don't see in real time?

Ignorance? You are the poster child for ignorance!

[davidm]

Did you imagine that Dennett was not a compatibilist, dumb ass? Just as spacemonkey is? If you knew he was a compatibilist, why in the world would you invoke his name? Are you now a compatibilist, and prepared to apologize to spacemoneky for indulging all your rubbish?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by davidm

Did you imagine that Dennett was not a compatibilist, dumb ass? Just as spacemonkey is? If you knew he was a compatibilist, why in the world would you invoke his name? Are you now a compatibilist, and prepared to apologize to spacemoneky for indulging all your rubbish?

I invoked his name because I agree with him in certain respects, which has nothing to do with his inaccurate compatibilist views! You attack me before you even know what I’m talking about! Real smart David!

[davidm]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I invoked his name because I agree with him in certain respects, which has nothing to do with his inaccurate compatibilist views, dumb ass!

Oh, you agree with him in certain respects ... What "certain respects" would those be, fuckwit? He entirely agrees with spacemonkey and entirely disagrees with you!

You just invoked his name in your ignorance because you did not realize he was a compatibilist! You still don't even know what compatibilism is!

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by davidm

Did you imagine that Dennett was not a compatibilist, dumb ass? Just as spacemonkey is? If you knew he was a compatibilist, why in the world would you invoke his name? Are you now a compatibilist, and prepared to apologize to spacemoneky for indulging all your rubbish?

Spacemonkey has to apologize to me first!

[davidm]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I know he is a compatibilist, and he’s wrong! All compatibles makes is is a semantic play on words to make it appear that you can be free and determined at the same time! And you have fallen for it!

So why did you invoke his name, and what do you agree with him about, asshat?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by davidm

Did you imagine that Dennett was not a compatibilist, dumb ass? Just as spacemonkey is? If you knew he was a compatibilist, why in the world would you invoke his name? Are you now a compatibilist, and prepared to apologize to spacemoneky for indulging all your rubbish?

I invoked his name because I agree with him in certain respects, which has nothing to do with his inaccurate compatibilist views.

Originally Posted by “davidm

Oh, you agree with him in certain respects ... What "certain respects" would those be, fuckwit? He entirely agrees with spacemonkey and entirely disagrees with you!

Who cares! They’re both wrong!!

Originally Posted by “davidm”

You just invoked his name in your ignorance because you did not realize he was a compatibilist! You still don't even know what compatibilism is!

I know he is a compatibilist, and he’s incorrect! Compatibilism is just a semantic play on words to make it appear that you can be free and determined at the same time! And you have fallen for it!

Originally Posted by “Davidm

why did you invoke his name, and what do you agree with him about, asshat?

I don’t engage with name callers.

[davidm]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I invoked his name because I agree with him in certain respects, which has nothing to do with his inaccurate compatibilist views.

Who cares! They’re both wrong!!

I know he is a compatibilist, and he’s incorrect! Compatibilism is just a semantic play on words to make it appear that you can be free and determined at the same time! And you have fallen for it!

I don’t engage with name callers.

But people have been calling you names since 2011, and here you still are, wasting your time!

Why can't you answer the question? WHAT do you agree with Daniel Dennett about, since he wholly disagrees with you and completely agrees with spacemonkey?

You can't answer the question because you know perfectly well that you did NOT KNOW that Dennett was a compatibilist, just like spacemonkey -- you probably skimmed something he wrote, and drew the WRONG conclusion about his views -- and now you just can't admit it!

Do you think you are fooling ANYONE here?

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I invoked his name because I agree with him in certain respects, which has nothing to do with his inaccurate compatibilist views.

Who cares! They’re both wrong!!

I know he is a compatibilist, and he’s incorrect! Compatibilism is just a semantic play on words to make it appear that you can be free and determined at the same time! And you have fallen for it!

I don’t engage with name callers.

Originally Posted by “davidm

”

But people have been calling you names since 2011, and here you still are, wasting your time!

Why can't you answer the question? WHAT do you agree with Daniel Dennett about, since he wholly disagrees with you and completely agrees with spacemonkey?

You can't answer the question because you know perfectly well that you did NOT KNOW that Dennett was a compatibilist, just like spacemonkey -- you probably skimmed something he wrote, and drew the WRONG conclusion about his views -- and now you just can't admit it!

Do you think you are fooling ANYONE here?

I couldn’t care less what people in here think. You are wrong again in thinking I didn’t know Dennett was a compatibilist. That is why I specified that I agree with certain things but not his compatibilist beliefs.

[ChuckF]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

Many thanks to this forum

peacegirl, I am glad that you were able to benefit from the undeniable, mathematical, and scientific fact that I am the True Steward of the Authentic Text, even if you do blame me for it.

[davidm]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I couldn’t care less what people in here think. You are wrong again in thinking I didn’t know Dennett was a compatibilist. That is why I specified that I agree with certain things but not his compatibilist beliefs.

What certain things? Name them!

[But]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I couldn’t care less

OK, now what about those space probes? Have you figured out what's going on?

[davidm]

Also you did NOT specify, in your initial post THANKING him (and implicitly thanking ChuckF) that you knew he was a compatibilist but agreed with certain things that he said. You posted that only AFTER I pointed out that he was a compatibilist!

[Florence Jellem]

Boys, are we back in business?

[ChuckF]

If so, I have a 2018 surprise cooking. (All you e-homos, take note!)

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by davidm

Also you did NOT specify, in your initial post THANKING him (and implicitly thanking ChuckF) that you knew he was a compatibilist but agreed with certain things that he said. You posted that only AFTER I pointed out that he was a compatibilist!

I did not have to specify that I was well aware he was a compatibilist to prove to you that I already knew this. Your pointing out that he was a compatibilist had zilch to do my knowledge of Dennett’s beliefs. Your reasoning is so off, it’s amazing you don’t see it! You’re making all kinds of assumptions.

[peacegirl]

Originally Posted by Florence Jellem

Boys, are we back in business?

No, you’re not back in business to make fun at my expense just because you don’t like the idea that man’s will is not free and that time is not a dimension!

[davidm]

Originally Posted by ChuckF

If so, I have a 2018 surprise cooking. (All you e-homos, take note!)

Oh, good, young man, will this be another recording?

Flo sure got a belly laugh at the last one and I pissed my panties!

[davidm]

My Aunt Flo accidentally used my login.

Auntie, don't forget your brain scan appointment on Tuesday.

You nephew David.

[Stephen Maturin]

Originally Posted by peacegirl

I invoked his name because I agree with him in certain respects, which has nothing to do with his inaccurate compatibilist views!

Oh, OK. Is Dennett a rape apologist or something?

[peacegirl]

This is not free thought. The name of this forum is a misnomer.

[The Lone Ranger]

It's not an unreasonable request. You said "I agree with him in certain respects", so it's not unreasonable to ask what you think Dennett's right about.

It shouldn't be the least bit difficult for you -- a matter of just a few seconds' worth of typing. Assuming, of course, that you aren't pulling the "I agree with him in certain respects" from out of your nether regions, that is.

Ideally, you'd also provide some justification for your opinion. But, of course, we all know better than to expect that from you.