|
|
12-09-2011, 11:17 PM
|
|
Man, the French have a different word for everything!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Agreed.
I voted "no".
|
12-09-2011, 11:19 PM
|
|
Adequately Crumbulent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Need a vote from you too, Daphne.
|
12-10-2011, 03:39 AM
|
|
Adequately Crumbulent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
The proposed mission is rejected.
Proposal | Proposed By | Adam | Daphne | Kael | chunksmediocrites | Jerome | Contra | Mission Result |
---|
1.1: Adam, Daphne | Adam | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | SUCCESS | 2.1: Chunk, Jerome, Contra | Daphne | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | n/a |
# | Player | |
---|
1 | Adam | | 2 | Daphne | | 3 | Kael | LEADER | 4 | chunksmediocrites | | 5 | Jerome | | 6 | Contra | |
Kael is the new leader.
|
12-10-2011, 03:43 AM
|
|
the internet says I'm right
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western U.S.
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Proposal 2.2: Adam, Daphne, Kael
__________________
For Science!Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
|
12-10-2011, 04:02 AM
|
|
ne plus ultraviolet
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
|
12-10-2011, 04:35 AM
|
|
Dr. Jerome Corsi-Soetoro, Ph.D., Esq.
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kael
Proposal 2.2: Adam, Daphne, Kael
|
I Voted Yes.
__________________
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.
|
12-10-2011, 06:01 PM
|
|
Adequately Crumbulent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Thanks for the votes, we have two more outstanding for Proposal 2.2: Adam, Daphne, Kael
|
12-10-2011, 07:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
I just sent you my vote.
|
12-10-2011, 08:20 PM
|
|
Adequately Crumbulent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Again 6 yes votes.
Proposal | Proposed By | Adam | Daphne | Kael | chunksmediocrites | Jerome | Contra | Mission Result |
---|
1.1: Adam, Daphne | Adam | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | SUCCESS | 2.1: Chunk, Jerome, Contra | Daphne | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | n/a | 2.2: Adam, Daphne, Kael | Kael | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Pending |
Mission 2 is Adam, Daphne and Kael. Please send in a SUCCESS or FAIL PM to me.
|
12-11-2011, 06:59 PM
|
|
Adequately Crumbulent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Kael?
|
12-11-2011, 11:33 PM
|
|
Adequately Crumbulent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Mission 2 FAILS, sabotaged by one of the members on the mission.
Mission | Result | Votes | Players |
---|
1 | SUCCESS | 2S | Adam, Daphne | 2 | FAILED | 2S, 1F | Adam, Daphne, Kael | 3 | | | | 4 | | | | 5 | | | |
# | Player | |
---|
1 | Adam | | 2 | Daphne | | 3 | Kael | | 4 | chunksmediocrites | LEADER | 5 | Jerome | | 6 | Contra | |
The new leader is chunks. Mission 3 will require 4 team members.
Mission | Team Size |
---|
1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
|
12-11-2011, 11:40 PM
|
|
Dr. Jerome Corsi-Soetoro, Ph.D., Esq.
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Adam
Daphne
CM
Jerome
__________________
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.
|
12-12-2011, 12:47 AM
|
|
ne plus ultraviolet
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
I'm running on the principle that Adam and Daphne are still the safest choices out of Adam, Daphne, and Kael, at this point. Though certainly Adam or Daphne would have been smart to allow the first mission to succeed.
The plus side is there was only one fail vote on mission 2.
I'm definitely including myself on the mission proposal, and I'm thinking Adam and Daphne again.
Jerome, Kael, Contra, any arguments for or against a line-up before I put out an official proposal? I'm thinking the fourth on this upcoming mission will be either Jerome or Contra. Adam and Daphne, any thoughts?
We need three successful missions to win, so we can only afford one more fail at most. Crumb, am I right that the two infiltrators know each other's identity?
|
12-12-2011, 12:51 AM
|
|
ne plus ultraviolet
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Oh, and to add: it's been pretty quiet so far so I'm encouraging some talk, to expand on the purely statistical likelihood part. And in case I'm missing some glaringly obvious reasoning.
|
12-12-2011, 01:01 AM
|
|
the internet says I'm right
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western U.S.
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Obviously you have no compelling reason to believe this, but I sent myself because mine is the only alignment I can be certain of. I now know that either Adam or Daphne is a spy. Both is unlikely, since even though spies know each other they are not allowed to communicate outside this thread.
I am uncertain how to proceed for a 4-man mission. Every single non-spy must go for it to be successful, provided the spies don't troll us.
__________________
For Science!Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
|
12-12-2011, 01:27 AM
|
|
Adequately Crumbulent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Quote:
Crumb, am I right that the two infiltrators know each other's identity?
|
As Kael said, the spies know each other, but they are unable to communicate outside this thread.
|
12-12-2011, 01:45 AM
|
|
Dr. Jerome Corsi-Soetoro, Ph.D., Esq.
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunksmediocrites
Jerome, Kael, Contra, any arguments for or against a line-up before I put out an official proposal?
|
Jerome; trust me here.
__________________
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.
|
12-12-2011, 03:12 AM
|
|
Man, the French have a different word for everything!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Judging by the vote tally on the last mission there was only 1 vote to fail.
We know spies cannot communicate outside of thread so the likelihood of having two spies but only one vote to fail seems highly unlikely, imo.
It's not as if they could communicate regarding who would vote to fail and who would vote to succeed.
This tells me that there is more than likely only one spy in that last group.
Does anyone see any reason to believe otherwise?
|
12-12-2011, 04:58 AM
|
|
ne plus ultraviolet
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
I think that's sound. One spy is more likely out of Adam, Daphne, and Kael. Which means it is likely the second spy is either Contrapposto or Jerome, from my point of view. I know I'm not a spy (though of course you can't be sure) which makes it rough, because if I go with the previous mission members plus me we already know there is at least one infiltrator in the group who will fail the mission; if I go with any other permutation it is also as likely to have at least one infiltrator. Using Adam and Daphne again in a group also means if the mission fails there is no telling if one of them is the infiltrator.
Kael, you would certainly send yourself on a mission if you knew you were not a spy, but you would have the same desire to go on a mission if you were a spy. Jerome, you are hot to go on the mission, and Contrapposto you haven't pulled for going on the mission... which play makes one of you more likely to be an infiltrator?
Jerome, why should I go on the mission, and not Contra?
|
12-12-2011, 07:44 AM
|
|
ne plus ultraviolet
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Proposal 3.1: Adam, Daphne, chunksmediocrites, Contra
I'm not sure how sneaky Daphne is, and Adam has been pretty quiet but it is the weekend. The simplest story line would be that Kael is a spy. I know I'm not a spy, so the second spy is either Contra or Jerome. And I'm starting to over-think it so I'm going to guess with no strong evidence either way.
|
12-12-2011, 02:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunksmediocrites
Proposal 3.1: Adam, Daphne, chunksmediocrites, Contra
I'm not sure how sneaky Daphne is, and Adam has been pretty quiet but it is the weekend. The simplest story line would be that Kael is a spy. I know I'm not a spy, so the second spy is either Contra or Jerome. And I'm starting to over-think it so I'm going to guess with no strong evidence either way.
|
I am not sneaky nor a spy. So that would leave either Kael or Adam as a spy. Now the first mission Adam and I had a success. So that leads me to believe that it is Kael. I guess Adam could have chosen to have a successful mission. I am still leaning towards Kael.
|
12-12-2011, 02:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contrapposto
Judging by the vote tally on the last mission there was only 1 vote to fail.
We know spies cannot communicate outside of thread so the likelihood of having two spies but only one vote to fail seems highly unlikely, imo.
It's not as if they could communicate regarding who would vote to fail and who would vote to succeed.
This tells me that there is more than likely only one spy in that last group.
Does anyone see any reason to believe otherwise?
|
I tend to agree with you here. I guess if there were two spies, one could have just picked to not fail?
|
12-12-2011, 03:36 PM
|
|
Adequately Crumbulent
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
We have a proposal.
Proposal 3.1: Adam, Daphne, chunksmediocrites, Contra
Please PM your yes or no votes in.
|
12-12-2011, 06:08 PM
|
|
Vice Cobra Assistant Commander
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
I agre with chunks' reasoning.
Including himself is the safest if he's not a spy, and Daphne and I have the best record so far. That leaves basically a toss up between contra and JEROME.
PMing yes.
__________________
"Trans Am Jesus" is "what hanged me"
|
12-12-2011, 06:15 PM
|
|
the internet says I'm right
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western U.S.
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: The Resistance 2 - Game Thread
I'm leaning toward Daphne as the spy between you two.
Regardless, it seems apparent that this mission will be approved, since the spies will no doubt vote yes, and too many of the resistance think it the safest bet. Then the record will be 1-2, and we'll have to make two perfect shots to win...
Trouble is, this roster adds two new faces for the Adam/Daphne spy to shift blame onto when it fails. Hell, they might even convince JEROME and others to send them as the core for the next mission, and then it's game over.
Things are not looking good for the Resistance.
__________________
For Science!Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 AM.
|
|
|
|