Quote:
Originally Posted by Aemilus
You don't see any problem there with the Law of Conservation of Energy?
|
I believe this is countered by the Law of Bogglingly Complex Plots Requiring Multiplicities Are Increasing Magnitudes of Un-Fucking Likely.
Media sources and government sources certainly can be biased, blinded, misled, mistaken, and/or outright Mephistophelian liars. And there are legitimate, even proven examples of government or media cover-ups. But the uncovered realities or likely truths are generally not particularly more complex than the lies... the Lockerbie Bombing of Pan Am flight 103 being an example.
Which gets us to the theories proposed about the WTC- almost all of these theories require a lot of people in on the plot who then did not reveal their roles, did not release credible evidence... the probability of which drops rapidly for every living being with knowledge of the plot.
To pull off big lies, the number of people who know different has to be a low number, and preferably dead.
Did many organizations, the US government especially, use 9/11 as justification to push through all sorts of horrendous shit? You bet.
What is it that you believe occurred on or before 9/11, that would be different from the history as it is taught today?