|
|
04-12-2018, 02:30 PM
|
|
here to bore you with pictures
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
It still doesn't explain my astute observation that my dog recognized me visually without any other sensory input.
|
My dogs recognize me by sight alone as well, specious. The only viable explanation is that our dogs resent Seymour Lessans for challenging their worldview.
|
Take a video to prove that your dog recognizes you without other sensory cues. Not hard to do.
|
The burden of proof is on you, not us. You're the one trying upset established theories with nonsense.
__________________
ta-
DAVE!!!
|
04-12-2018, 02:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I don’t live in your illusory world.
|
You mean the world where it's impossible for photons to magically be in two places at once or teleport instantaneously across millions of miles? You don't live in that world?
|
This is not teleportation. I don’t want to get into this again with you.
|
04-12-2018, 02:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
It still doesn't explain my astute observation that my dog recognized me visually without any other sensory input.
|
My dogs recognize me by sight alone as well, specious. The only viable explanation is that our dogs resent Seymour Lessans for challenging their worldview.
|
Take a video to prove that your dog recognizes you without other sensory cues. Not hard to do.
|
The burden of proof is on you, not us. You're the one trying upset established theories with nonsense.
|
I have offered Lessans’ explanation based on his observations. I can do no more. You can throw it out for all I care. You can throw his entire book out. If his discovery is valid and sound, it will come to light sooner or later. I am not in control of God’s timing.
|
04-12-2018, 02:49 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I have offered Lessans’ explanation based on his observations.
|
No, peacegirl, you haven't. You've only offered your Corrupted Text at $41.00 a pop. Your Corrupted Text must be rejected, because it is fraudulent and Corrupt.
We interpret the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime, and we do so without blame from you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
So interesting how fabrications can grow bigger and bigger if not checked.
|
So true, peacegirl, so true. That is why I, the True Steward of the Authentic Text, have stepped up to check your fabrications and corruptions as you hawk your Corrupted Text for lucre.
See how I have restored the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime - complete with the glandular homo-sexual, 98% of homo-sexual intercourse, the molecules of light, and all the rest that you suppressed and distorted and corrupted. Until I, the True Steward of the Authentic Text, rescued the Authentic Text from the obscurity to which you tried to consign it, and checked your cancerous Corrupted Text.
peacegirl, can you even explain the Butt Stuff Injunction in your own words? Not hard to do. If you can't you're a fraud.
|
04-12-2018, 03:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I have offered Lessans’ explanation based on his observations.
|
No, peacegirl, you haven't. You've only offered your Corrupted Text at $41.00 a pop. Your Corrupted Text must be rejected, because it is fraudulent and Corrupt.
|
BS Chuck. You know I have no control over the pricing. I only wish I could make lots of money so I could spread the word. From your mouth to God's ears.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck
We interpret the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime, and we do so without blame from you.
|
How many times do I have to tell you that I DO blame you for trying to make a joke out of an important discovery. I will continue to blame you no matter how many times you repeat the same garbage.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
So interesting how fabrications can grow bigger and bigger if not checked.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck
So true, peacegirl, so true. That is why I, the True Steward of the Authentic Text, have stepped up to check your fabrications and corruptions as you hawk your Corrupted Text for lucre.
|
You're not the true steward. You are a big fat liar whose mission is to hurt me. What surprises me is that no free thinker comes forward to ask questions. You and your cronies have created an unspoken censorship where no one dare crosses. This is the worst forum ever for free thought.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck
See how I have restored the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime - complete with the glandular homo-sexual, 98% of homo-sexual intercourse, the molecules of light, and all the rest that you suppressed and distorted and corrupted. Until I, the True Steward of the Authentic Text, rescued the Authentic Text from the obscurity to which you tried to consign it, and checked your cancerous Corrupted Text.
peacegirl, can you even explain the Butt Stuff Injunction in your own words? Not hard to do. If you can't you're a fraud.
|
You are so immersed in your fabrications that you can't decipher truth from fiction. It's unbelievable how much time you are spending on dissing a book when you have no understanding of it. He said that there are times homosexuality can come about because of glandular or physical causes which he distinguished from environmental causes. People sometimes prefer the same sex due to environmental determinants. This was not meant to condemn homosexuality. It also does make him a homophobe. Furthermore, he was not an astronomer. He used the word "molecule" mistakenly. This in itself does not make his findings inaccurate. Once again, you're doing everything in your power to ruin him, but you aren't that powerful. None of these corrections in my version corrupt his work.
Last edited by peacegirl; 04-12-2018 at 03:39 PM.
|
04-12-2018, 03:42 PM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
It also does make him a homophobe.
|
I think you mean "does not make him [Lessans] a homophobe." Very sloppy, peacegirl, very sloppy indeed.
And no one is calling Lessans homophobic. We who study the Authentic Text know that he used the term "perversion" in the non-derogatory sense. After all, he said so himself! If only you'd read the Authentic Text instead of getting liquored up on other people's money, you'd know these things.
You're the only hateful homophobic bigot here. It was you, not Lessans, who likened homosexuality to crime, hatred, poverty and war.
And why did you do away with Lessans' tripartite classification of homo-sexuals (glandular, inherited, environmental)? It's a useful jumping-off point for further discussion, don't you think?
Oh, and you're not fooling anyone. We all noticed your ungainly dodging of ChuckF's request to describe the Butt-Stuff Injunction in your own words. We also know you can't do it.
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
04-12-2018, 04:05 PM
|
|
Porn papers, surrealistic artifacts, kitchen smells, defecated food and sprayed perfume cocktail.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Also, can peacegirl describe, in her own words, the Boohog Corollary and the Surreptitious Aphrodisiac Theorem? If not, she'll have to go to remedial training.
Peacegirl, you'll be benched for a week if you keep up these shenanigans.
|
04-12-2018, 04:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
It also does make him a homophobe.
|
I think you mean "does not make him [Lessans] a homophobe." Very sloppy, peacegirl, very sloppy indeed.
And no one is calling Lessans homophobic. We who study the Authentic Text know that he used the term "perversion" in the non-derogatory sense. After all, he said so himself! If only you'd read the Authentic Text instead of getting liquored up on other people's money, you'd know these things.
|
Your insulting comments are only serving to expose what a mean-spirited person you are. His use of the term "perversion" was the result of the time he was living in. He never used that word in his other books which came much later. So now his discovery is not valid because he used this term? What are you getting at?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
|
That wasn't homophobic. I was just saying that war and crime come from environmental conditions, as does some people who turn to homosexuality as their preference. I made no judgement. Once again, you are looking for lulz, and when you can't find it, you fabricate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
And why did you do away with Lessans' tripartite classification of homo-sexuals (glandular, inherited, environmental)? It's a useful jumping-off point for further discussion, don't you think?
|
No, it is not a jumping-off point because it has nothing to do with the core of his discovery. It was a side-note. Did you not read my earlier post that this discovery changes the ENVIRONMENT in which we live? A person whose environment was damaging in some way may cause him to become homosexual. He did NOT bring this up to lower the status of homosexuals in any way, AND NEITHER DID I. Stop working so hard to make up s*&*t. It's unbecoming.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Oh, and you're not fooling anyone. We all noticed your ungainly dodging of ChuckF's request to describe the Butt-Stuff Injunction in your own words. We also know you can't do it.
|
I have no idea what Butt-Stuff you're talking about because I don't see what you're seeing. You're misinterpretation is in your head. This shows how easy it is to take something out of context and make it completely unrecognizable to satisfy your preconceptions.
Last edited by peacegirl; 04-12-2018 at 04:22 PM.
|
04-12-2018, 04:15 PM
|
|
Porn papers, surrealistic artifacts, kitchen smells, defecated food and sprayed perfume cocktail.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
She doesn't know what the Butt Stuff Injunction is -- yet claims to be the True Steward of the Authentic Text. My, my, how telling!
Next, watch the poor dear disavow any knowledge of the Parable of the Breasts, and the iconic Ur-Penis.
|
04-12-2018, 04:22 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I have no idea what Butt-Stuff you're talking about because I don't see what you're seeing.
|
We know, peacegirl - you can't even recognize the Authentic Text when you see it. Do you even know what the Boohog Corollary is? You're too busy trying to fool people into buying your Corrupted Text to line your own pockets.
That's why you're a fraud, peacegirl.
As the True Steward of the Authentic Text, I affirm that I will never charge money to share in the Authentic Text!
|
04-12-2018, 04:24 PM
|
|
here to bore you with pictures
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
The burden of proof is on you, not us. You're the one trying upset established theories with nonsense.
|
I have offered Lessans’ explanation based on his observations. I can do no more.
|
You could do a lot more, but you don't.
__________________
ta-
DAVE!!!
|
04-12-2018, 04:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I have no idea what Butt-Stuff you're talking about because I don't see what you're seeing.
|
We know, peacegirl - you can't even recognize the Authentic Text when you see it. Do you even know what the Boohog Corollary is? You're too busy trying to fool people into buying your Corrupted Text to line your own pockets.
That's why you're a fraud, peacegirl.
As the True Steward of the Authentic Text, I affirm that I will never charge money to share in the Authentic Text!
|
I hope people read the entire text without your interference. You are the worst fraud there is!
|
04-12-2018, 04:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
The burden of proof is on you, not us. You're the one trying upset established theories with nonsense.
|
I have offered Lessans’ explanation based on his observations. I can do no more.
|
You could do a lot more, but you don't.
|
Don't tell me what I do or don't do specious. You aren't in my shoes. It's very easy to judge others, isn't it? It keeps you from looking at yourself. Why not try to help rather than criticize. You may come across someone who finds this work compelling and could help get it into the right hands. You never know.
|
04-12-2018, 04:50 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I hope people read the entire text without your interference.
|
peacegirl, protecting the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime - without the interference of your Corruption - is the very essence of my True Stewardship of the Authentic Text, just as 3 is to 6 as 4 is to 8.
I know that this upsets you because it makes it harder for you to hawk your $41.00 Corrupted Text for lucre. And I know that you hatefully swat away that magical elixir (or corollary, or slide-rule) offered by Lessans in the Authentic Text, and blame me for this. That is your business, not mine. However, I am compelled of my own free will to rid the Authentic Text of the cancer of your Corruptions, and I reject your blame. It is not a true hurt to the Authentic Text, because as the True Steward of the Authentic Text, I consider the source.
|
04-12-2018, 05:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I hope people read the entire text without your interference.
|
peacegirl, protecting the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime - without the interference of your Corruption - is the very essence of my True Stewardship of the Authentic Text, just as 3 is to 6 as 4 is to 8.
I know that this upsets you because it makes it harder for you to hawk your $41.00 Corrupted Text for lucre. And I know that you hatefully swat away that magical elixir (or corollary, or slide-rule) offered by Lessans in the Authentic Text, and blame me for this. That is your business, not mine. However, I am compelled of my own free will to rid the Authentic Text of the cancer of your Corruptions, and I reject your blame. It is not a true hurt to the Authentic Text, because as the True Steward of the Authentic Text, I consider the source.
|
You are the steward of the authentic text like I am God!
|
04-12-2018, 06:13 PM
|
|
here to bore you with pictures
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
The burden of proof is on you, not us. You're the one trying upset established theories with nonsense.
|
I have offered Lessans’ explanation based on his observations. I can do no more.
|
You could do a lot more, but you don't.
|
Don't tell me what I do or don't do specious. You aren't in my shoes. It's very easy to judge others, isn't it? It keeps you from looking at yourself. Why not try to help rather than criticize. You may come across someone who finds this work compelling and could help get it into the right hands. You never know.
|
Seriously, why would you even elicit my help? Why would you think I'd be motivated to help you or the text? I've already given this more effort than I think it deserves. You've been helped enough, but you disdained it because it wasn't what you wanted to hear. The Lone Ranger alone has given you the informational equivalent of a college science credit and you ignored it all.
I sometime forget how dysfunctional you are, and I respond, and then I start to regret it again. I'm now in that regret stage again.
__________________
ta-
DAVE!!!
|
04-12-2018, 06:19 PM
|
|
This is the title that appears beneath your name on your posts.
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
|
That wasn't homophobic. I was just saying that war and crime come from environmental conditions, as does some people who turn to homosexuality as their preference. I made no judgement. Once again, you are looking for lulz, and when you can't find it, you fabricate.
|
Sure, putting those things together in a sentence doesn't necessarily imply that they are alike. It's akin to observing the fact that just like Josef Mengele, Seymour Lessans researched how the eyes work.
|
04-12-2018, 06:53 PM
|
|
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
That wasn't homophobic.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
A person whose environment was damaging in some way may cause him to become homosexual.
|
No, no homophobe you!
|
04-12-2018, 07:36 PM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
peacegirl has told us more than once that the fondest desire of the overwhelming majority of so-called "homosexual" men is to bang women. Trouble is, no women will have these particular men because of their flouncingly effeminate behavior. Therefore, despite being sexually attracted to women, these gentlemen resort to inserting their boners into the bummy-wums of other similarly situated gentlemen.
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
04-12-2018, 08:02 PM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
It also does make him a homophobe.
|
I think you mean "does not make him [Lessans] a homophobe." Very sloppy, peacegirl, very sloppy indeed.
And no one is calling Lessans homophobic. We who study the Authentic Text know that he used the term "perversion" in the non-derogatory sense. After all, he said so himself! If only you'd read the Authentic Text instead of getting liquored up on other people's money, you'd know these things.
|
Your insulting comments are only serving to expose what a mean-spirited person you are.
|
I've repeatedly acknowledged the fact that I'm a mean-spirited person. What does this ongoing ad hom of yours have to do with the subject at hand, namely your vicious corruption of Seymour Lessans' work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
His use of the term "perversion" was the result of the time he was living in.
|
I know. He himself wrote in the Authentic Text that he was using the term non-derogatorily. As I said, Lessans is not the hateful homophobic bigot here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
|
That wasn't homophobic.
|
Of course it was. You likened homosexuality to crime, hatred, poverty and war. Your preferred solution to posts in which you accidentally reveal your true nature is to scrub them, as you did with the writings of Seymour Lessans. Unfortunately for you, the post is question is too old for you to edit, so it now stands as a permanent monument to your hateful homophobic bigotry. Your after-the-fact efforts to spin your hateful comments can most charitably be described as laughably unconvincing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I made no judgement.
|
What's the problem here? Thanks to your boy Trump, overt hatred is back in style. Hell, it's just like the 1940s and 1950s, except that inequality of wealth distribution is much worse nowadays, such that scapegoating is an even more powerful force. For people like you, 2018 America is the Golden Age!
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
A person whose environment was damaging in some way may cause him to become homosexual.
|
Yes, yes, we know already - you hate queers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
He did NOT bring this up to lower the status of homosexuals in any way,
|
That's true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
AND NEITHER DID I.
|
That's a spectacularly transparent lie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I have no idea what Butt-Stuff you're talking about because I don't see what you're seeing.
|
Well, you might have some idea what we're talking about if you would read the Authentic Text rather than bending it over the dinner table and non-consensually sodomizing it with a rusty hacksaw blade.
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
04-12-2018, 08:05 PM
|
|
This is the title that appears beneath your name on your posts.
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
peacegirl has told us more than once that the fondest desire of the overwhelming majority of so-called "homosexual" men is to bang women. Trouble is, no women will have these particular men because of their flouncingly effeminate behavior. Therefore, despite being sexually attracted to women, these gentlemen resort to inserting their boners into the bummy-wums of other similarly situated gentlemen.
|
And then there are these 98% which don't mean exactly 98% but just some large percentage or more generally, some sort of number.
|
04-12-2018, 08:08 PM
|
|
Porn papers, surrealistic artifacts, kitchen smells, defecated food and sprayed perfume cocktail.
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Bummy wummy rumpy pumpy!
(Provided no little ones are present.)
|
04-12-2018, 09:38 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Florence Jellem
(Provided no little ones are present.)
|
Let's not forget that this is pure Corruption. Another of peacegirl's fabrications, found only in her Corrupted Text and wholly absent from the Authentic Text as written by the Author and published in his lifetime. peacegirl simply made it up, and injected it like a deadly virus into the Authentic Text, where it Corrupts to this day.
Friends, this is why peacegirl is a fraud, and why we are compelled, of our own free wills, to reject her Corrupted Text, for it is fraudulent and Corrupt.
|
04-12-2018, 09:42 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin
peacegirl has told us more than once that the fondest desire of the overwhelming majority of so-called "homosexual" men is to bang women. Trouble is, no women will have these particular men because of their flouncingly effeminate behavior. Therefore, despite being sexually attracted to women, these gentlemen resort to inserting their boners into the bummy-wums of other similarly situated gentlemen.
|
And yet, peacegirl has never yet been able to identify the data sets from which this assertion is derived, or the facts that support it.
|
04-12-2018, 10:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by specious_reasons
The burden of proof is on you, not us. You're the one trying upset established theories with nonsense.
|
I have offered Lessans’ explanation based on his observations. I can do no more.
|
You could do a lot more, but you don't.
|
Don't tell me what I do or don't do specious. You aren't in my shoes. It's very easy to judge others, isn't it? It keeps you from looking at yourself. Why not try to help rather than criticize. You may come across someone who finds this work compelling and could help get it into the right hands. You never know.
|
Seriously, why would you even elicit my help? Why would you think I'd be motivated to help you or the text? I've already given this more effort than I think it deserves. You've been helped enough, but you disdained it because it wasn't what you wanted to hear. The Lone Ranger alone has given you the informational equivalent of a college science credit and you ignored it all.
I sometime forget how dysfunctional you are, and I respond, and then I start to regret it again. I'm now in that regret stage again.
|
So why are you here? Don’t waste any more time somewhere you have regrets about. You’ll never get this time back.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 AM.
|
|
|
|