Maybe I need to recuse myself from MCing this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by godfry
Just tell us you didn't hire Diebold to count the votes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 54
I hear Arthur Anderson could use some business.
These are three posts almost in a row where I have no idea what you crazy people are talking about.
No more in-jokes, dammit.
Are you serious, young Roo? Recuse would be familiar to you if you watched any law shows ... or studied law. Diebold should be familiar to you if you followed news about American elections - in fact if you did anything short of ignoring radio, TV and internet for the past 5 years. Admittedly, Arthur Andersen was missspelled, but again, you can hardly have failed to notice the impact of the Enron scandal on them.
Hey, Crumb. Can we second other people's noms even if we've already nominated our own four?
No. Though I would love to second , as I failed to see it when I was nominating. I guess with four I should have saved one. If someone wants to kiss my ass, they know what to do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leesifer
('cos I'm a crawler!)
I don't know what it means to be a crawler, but the Train Wreck is already in. You can vote for another instead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by liv
You already have your four liv, and this one is not in the category anyway.
First we had a new retroactive rule on "typo humour" which practically got me banned. Now I'm not even allowed to mention a typo to help another board member who had no idea what everyone was talking about?
Go ahead with the ing, but isn't this board turning into exactly what you tried to avoid?