Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-23-2023, 04:31 PM
specious_reasons's Avatar
specious_reasons specious_reasons is offline
here to bore you with pictures
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: VCXLVII
Images: 8
Default True crime and the media that loves it.

For the last few months, I dipped my toe into a true crime podcast: Rabia and Ellyn Solve the Case.

Ellyn Marsh is an entertainer and true crime obsessive, and Rabia Chaudry is an attorney who advocated for Adnan Syed (she's the person who convinced Serial's Sarah Koenig to do a story on the case).

As a person who has an unhealthy fascination with crap, I 100% understand the appeal of the "true crime." It's the worst (and best) of humanity with the benefit of being real life.

I just dropped the podcast. The trigger for this was the two part series on Jan Broberg.

Jan Broberg is someone who was the victim of a serial pedophile who involved himself with her family. Their families because fast friends when they became neighbors. He took both families on nice vacations and helped the Brobergs out financially. He seduced Jan's mother and father, mostly so he'd have the power of shame over them. He eventually brainwashes middle school age Jan into believing that aliens had commanded her to have a baby with him. The story is pretty wild in terrifying ways.

Rabia and Ellyn had a part one of this podcast. They discussed the case based on public documentation. One thing they couldn't get their heads around was how the Brobergs continued to associate with this man. They were extremely critical of the parents, accusing them of putting their reputation ahead of the safety of their children.

Well, Jan Broberg is a public figure - telling her story to raise exposure of sexual predation, so she volunteered to come on the show for a part 2. According to her, their criticisms about her parents were mostly wrong. The Brobergs weren't putting their reputation ahead of the safety of her daughter. A lot of the wilder events happened because Jan was brainwashed and just old enough to circumvent her parent's authority with the help of this man. The family was, unfortunately, tricked and outwitted by a clever predator, even after they knew of his abuses.

I'm so annoyed at this podcast after part 2. It's not that it was discussing this case based on misleading public documentation, it's the attitude between parts 1 and 2. At first, there's all of this righteous indignation at the parents, and in part 2, there's this self-serving obsequiousness to Jan Broberg. A lot of the host's talk on part 2 is minimizing or justifying their words in part 1.

This podcast was sold to me on the idea that the hosts would take a critical look at these cases based on original sources, not just to be another form of gossip. I was already suspicious from previous episodes that this wasn't always true. This two-parter on the Brobergs really cemented in my mind i can't always trust the hosts to do the work.

This and the billion-page Amanda Knox threads I've seen on other forums makes me think I need to be careful about what true crime media I consume. There is a surprising lack of truth in true crime.
__________________
ta-
DAVE!!!
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Ari (03-23-2023), BrotherMan (03-23-2023), Crumb (03-24-2023), fragment (03-24-2023), lisarea (03-24-2023), mickthinks (03-23-2023), slimshady2357 (03-23-2023), Sock Puppet (03-23-2023), Stephen Maturin (03-23-2023)
  #2  
Old 03-24-2023, 04:14 PM
Crumb's Avatar
Crumb Crumb is offline
Adequately Crumbulent
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
Posts: LXMMCDVIII
Blog Entries: 22
Images: 355
Default Re: True crime and the media that loves it.

Did they also talk about the pressure from the church for the Brobergs not to take any action against the perpetrator and to continue to associate with his family? This was something that was mentioned in the mother's book that wasn't mentioned in the Netflix documentary Abducted in Plain Sight.
__________________
:joecool2: :cascadia: :ROR: :portland: :joecool2:
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
lisarea (03-24-2023)
  #3  
Old 03-24-2023, 11:02 PM
specious_reasons's Avatar
specious_reasons specious_reasons is offline
here to bore you with pictures
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: VCXLVII
Images: 8
Default Re: True crime and the media that loves it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumb View Post
Did they also talk about the pressure from the church for the Brobergs not to take any action against the perpetrator and to continue to associate with his family? This was something that was mentioned in the mother's book that wasn't mentioned in the Netflix documentary Abducted in Plain Sight.
Jan Broberg seems somewhat unhappy with Abducted in Plain Sight. She and her mother had more direct involvement in A Friend of the Family, which is a fictionalized version, but she thinks it represents her parents better.

I think the church was mentioned, but mostly as another institution that failed the family. However, according to her, Broberg's father cut off all ties with the man after the kidnapping, but Jan was a teen by then and went around her parents.
__________________
ta-
DAVE!!!
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Crumb (03-24-2023)
  #4  
Old 06-06-2023, 09:19 PM
specious_reasons's Avatar
specious_reasons specious_reasons is offline
here to bore you with pictures
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: VCXLVII
Images: 8
Default Re: True crime and the media that loves it.

I eventually watched the whole of A Friend of the Family, and it was interesting, but still really weird. Since it's fictionalized, I consider it to be "true" only in broad strokes. The story lionizes the father more than condemns him. He attempts to block all contact between the families, he admits his indiscretion to the church and pays penance, and he kicks the mother out of the house when he learns she had an affair with the predator after the kidnapping. He even winds up forgiving the mother after that incredible lapse in judgement, at least after she realizes how terrible of a lapse in judgement it was.

Still - how naive could her parents (especially her mother) be? Even if they were not suspicious before, the first kidnapping is a bright line that once crossed, he should never have been trusted again. Jan should have been watched

As I understand it, Broberg started to doubt her abuser's story when she wasn't "vaporized" on her 16th birthday. Then, she started testing other aspects of the story, and they fell apart, too. It's truly a shame her parents couldn't figure out the problem until after Jan figured it out for herself.
__________________
ta-
DAVE!!!
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
BrotherMan (06-07-2023), Crumb (06-07-2023), Sock Puppet (06-13-2023)
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Public Baths > News, Politics & Law


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.22396 seconds with 15 queries