Wait, you really do think his wife was lying that he was using funds from Snopes to pay for his hookers?
Baaahaaaaa
Liberals hate women and are the biggest suckers on earth.
__________________
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.
His current hooker wife is currently employed by Snopes.
That is part of the reason he is being sued.
Its pretty obvious he is using company funds to pay for his sex.
Send him some more money you big dummies, he very well may have no role in the company come next Friday.
__________________
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.
lol, you sent him money didn't you, and are mad its being used for his hooker wife to peg him!
__________________
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.
It does seem like he's putting in more time and effort trying to get a reaction than everyone else put together is spending reacting. So if it is trolling, it's not very good.
... learning information that harms a liberal's worldview, the reaction is always personal attacks.
__________________
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.
Its much easier to fool someone than to tell someone they were fooled.
__________________
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. ... The origin of myths is explained in this way.
OK, so fuck snopes and I hope it dies. Also Google.
So Google launched this "Fact Check" section on Google news to supposedly counter the whole fake news phenomenon (not the fake "fake news," but the actual fake news, mind you).
And snopes is one of the main sources they cite there, and what do they fucking do? They do this clickbait bullshit:
If those fuckers are actually going to try to milk this stuff for clicks by putting lies out there with a question mark attached, they are a vector for urban legends, not an inoculation. They can't play dumb and pretend they don't know that people are just going to elide the question mark and repeat any sensationalist bullshit that comes before it. The celebrity gossip sites like the "Gossip Cop" site there have more integrity than they do.
And certainly Google must have some lowly employee in a utility closet somewhere at least spot checking the sites they feature for veracity. Why haven't they bumped snopes for this shit?
I've noticed that there seems to be a somewhat organized effort by Trump supporters to discredit Snopes lately. In the past few weeks, I've seen lots of Facebook posts saying, in effect, "Don't trust Snopes; it's part of the Liberal conspiracy to hide the truth from you." All too often, the "evidence" they use to bolster their case is entirely fabricated.
Amusingly -- or sadly, depending on your outlook -- when I've clicked on the supporting links, they often say the exact opposite of what the person linking to them claims they say.
__________________
“The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be.”
-- Socrates
Last edited by The Lone Ranger; 01-20-2020 at 03:20 PM.
Reason: Corrected a typo.
I've noticed that there seems to be a somewhat organized effort by Trump supporters to discredit Snopes lately. In the past few weeks, I've seen lots of Facebook posts saying, in effect, "Don't trust Snopes; it's part of the Liberal conspiracy to hide the truth from you." All too often, the "evidence" they use to bolster their case is entirely fabricated.
Amusingly -- or sadly, depending on your outlook -- when I've clicked on the supporting links, they often say the exact opposite of what the person linking to them claims they say.
Weird, too, because over the past couple of weeks I've seen Snopes shoot down false assertions about the orange man himself.
Magahats shouting about stuff about Snopes being a Soros funded propaganda arm has been going on for awhile now. Here's some info about the meme that kicked it off:
Re: Snopes
?
Linear Mode
