Quote:
Originally Posted by wade-w
I see that I was right; I have not expressed myself well. vm, My reference to whining was based on not wanting to make that reputation as a whiner even worse than it already is.
|
I understood that. My point (probably not well made) was that it seems reasonable to assume that you don't have the reputation of being a whiner you think you have, or if you do it may just be one or two people who think it and not be as widespread as you think. However every time you mention it (and you've mentioned it several times in the last month or so) you encourage people to make that erroneous association between you and "whiner". In Dawkin's terminology: You perpetuate the meme. I suggest you just let it go.
My reputation for being a whiner came from my frequent criticisms of the administration and moderation at IIDB. Many times I considered not participating in discussions about the policies and procedures there precisely because I didn't want to perpetuate that reputation. In fact there are at least two admins who won't even post in threads I post in for that reason, as one of them explained to me.
However I didn't let the fact that some vocal critics - even prominent ones - called me a whiner and made other disparaging insinuations keep me from speaking up. I just accepted the fact that sometimes what I consider an important moral stance someone else considers whining. So you wonder what you can do to avoid getting a reputation as a whiner? The only guaranteed strategy I know of is to keep your mouth shut, and in particular about issues of any importance to you. That may work for some, but for me the respect and consideration I get from those who understand and/or agree with my positions far outweighs the fact that some people think I'm a whiner.