Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Quote:
Originally Posted by naturalist.atheist
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Your negative comments will have a definite impact on whether this knowledge is received positively or negatively by the people reading this thread.
|
Peacegirl, do these readers who have received Lessans' knowledge positively whisper to you or something? Are they your invisible friends? |
Yahbut, you cannot 100% prove that there is NOT a load of people reading this thread that are getting way convinced, so saying that there isn't is you being biased and unscientific!!11!! |
You're right it's not scientific. I never said it was, but from what I know about "group think", I believe there is some validity to this assertion. |
That, obviously, was a joke. And no, I was wrong: it is in fact unscientific and irrational to expect a 100% proven negative, the absence of which you can also use to defend the existence of the flying spaghetti monster. |
It was not a joke; it was meant to belittle. Yes, it's definitely irrational and unscientific to expect a 100% proven negative, but who's doing that?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
I am beginning to see Naturalist Atheist's point. Perhaps I have been seriously overestimating what you are capable of understanding.
|
 |
You did, Peacegirl. Several times during the discussions about light.