Re: A Revolution in Thought: Part Two
I am fascinated by the sheer transparent arrogance of this grown man trying to play professor. The way he tries to make the book sound important, and just makes himself sound like a muppet. The way he blames any disagreement squarely on the reader, never even entertaining the notion that he may have missed something. It is all made enjoyable by the fact that at the same time he was such an enormous bumbler, blissfully unaware of how dumb he was making himself look. Like inspector Clouseau, only without the luck.
All that defended by someone who is about as intelligent as the author, the only person in the entire world who really believes he was anything else than a self-important crackpot.
Whats not to like?
|