View Single Post
  #3089  
Old 12-28-2011, 11:41 PM
Spacemonkey's Avatar
Spacemonkey Spacemonkey is offline
I'll be benched for a week if I keep these shenanigans up.
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: VMCLXXIII
Default Re: A Revolution in Thought: Part Two

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacemonkey View Post
That doesn't answer the question. And I'm not asking you to explain anything in terms of the afferent model. I know the light is already present at the camera at the moment the photograph is taken. I am asking you about where this light came from before that point in time. Let me slightly rephrase to make this clear:

4. Did the light present at the camera at the moment the photograph is taken previously travel from the object to get there?
I know what you're asking me. You want me to say that there has to be a time delay if there is an order to the reflected light. The wavelengths that came first would arrive first at the camera, therefore we would not see red, which the object is at this moment; we would see blue. This makes sense, but Lessans' claims also make sense when you look at his explanation. It all comes down to who is right.
Just answer the question, Peacegirl. Seriously. Just answer it.

4. Did the light present at the camera at the moment the photograph is taken previously travel from the object to get there?

Lessans' claims do not make sense. As demonstrated by the fact that you can't answer simple questions like the one above without constantly contradicting yourself.
__________________
video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.18863 seconds with 10 queries