Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Light is a wavelength, and that wavelength has information, but when it strikes the retina it doesn't get transduced into signals that are then interpreted by the brain.
|
Your evidence in support of this claim is...? |
My evidence is how the brain is able to project words (that contain values) onto real substance that have no corresponding accuracy. If sight was afferent, the brain could not do this. I'm sure no one wants me to go over Chapter Four again.  |
What does the above even
mean? It is meaningless
world salad. Moreover, you continue to weasel out of confronting the fact that the eye has been
observed, studied, dissected and probed down to the atomic level. Something you would know, if you had not dishonestly refused to read The Lone Ranger's essay. (He who has in fact dissected eyes.) And the results are in: the eye is anatomically and empirically
observed to behave afferently, not efferently. This is a
true "astute observation" that is just as valid as the observation that the world is sphere-like and NOT flat.