Quote:
Originally Posted by naturalist.atheist
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivisectus
Note how in that picture one side of the mountain is darker? How come? What explains that in efferent vision? What difference does it make once the requirements are met?
In afferent vision we know why this is.
What causes the reflection in efferent vision anyway? Why is it there? Afferent vision explains it perfectly, and also explains why the reflection that is further away from the base of the mountain is darker and more blurry. What causes that in efferent vision?
Note how the sky is blue? Air is not blue, and nor is anything else out there! What causes us to see a blue sky even though there is no such object? Afferent vision explains it perfectly.
Why does the water look so dark? That water is not that colour at all if you pick some of it up with a translucent bucket. So how come it looks so dark? Afferent vision explains it perfectly. Efferent vision has no explanation at al.
That picture is full of dark mysteries where efferent vision is concerned. Afferent vision has clear answers though.
It is a perfect example of what is wrong with efferent vision as a theory. It explains nothing.
|
Vivisectus, keep on pluggin. One day that horse will sing. |
I know what you mean, and you may well be right! But I am STILL not ready to give up. I would not hold it against you if you pointed out that that makes me just as silly as Peacegirl or her dad, and I cannot argue with it. But some part of me refuses to believe there can be such a thing - that there is not some small amount of reason that can be reached under all the delusion.