Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Of course not, but efferent vision doesn't change the known properties of light, and it doesn't negate the known physical laws that require the film to come in contact with light photons to chemically react and form an image.
|
Then tell me how camera film, on Earth, can come into physical contact with light photons from the newly ignited sun that have not yet reached Earth.
There is a physical distance of millions of miles.
The sun was just turned on at noon. It is noon and 30 seconds right now.
There are no photons here on Earth yet to contact the film.
You've stated we could photograph the Sun at this point
I am saying that is not possible because the properties of light and film would not allow a photograph to be taken because the chemical reaction cannot take place without contact.
You state we do not need to change any physical properties of light or film or the requirements for their interaction.
Now, tell me. How can the photons and film come into physical contact? |
When the brain is looking, through the eyes, at the external world (which is everything that is in your visual range, not just one object), a mirror image of your entire field of view (or screen) shows up instantly on the film/retina. This mirror image that shows up at the film/retina is analogous to the water showing the mirror image of the mountain. Your lack of understanding the efferent version of sight is causing you to revert back to the afferent model which requires travel time. That's why what I'm saying still doesn't make sense to you.
1000 Pictures - Free Desktop Wallpaper |
You are not answering the question, or explaining anything.
How does this mirror imaging
negate physical distance to allow photons- that are not physically present at the same location as the film because they have to travel (that's a property of light) to get there- and film to actually touch.