Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
peacegirl. We are only following your statements to see if they are compatible with known science, as you insist efferent vision does not negate these known laws and principles. You can't invoke mysterious and completely redefined mechanisms like focusing and lenses and mirror imaging as if they are explanations unto themselves. You must explain HOW it works and HOW it is compatible.
So. How can a physically existing thing called a photon, that has a wavelength and travels at a finite speed per the properties of light, not travel with it's wavelength and instantly be 93 millions miles from its current location to interact with camera film through physical contact?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
I told you that I'm disputing that light coming from the Sun has a wavelength and travels at a finite speed.
|
What about light that is not from the sun, or which has been reflected one or 100 or 1000 times? Your statements all seem to indicate that reflected light has different properties than emitted light. You talked about no traveling blue light, for example.
Is that the case? Does blue light that was reflected off a balloon an hour ago (that popped 30 minutes ago) cease to exist? Stop traveling? Stop having a blue wavelength?