View Single Post
  #4918  
Old 01-16-2012, 12:37 AM
thedoc's Avatar
thedoc thedoc is offline
I'm Deplorable.
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: XMMCCCXCVI
Default Re: A Revolution in Thought: Part Two

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Dragar, but why can't it be seen is the issue. Don't you understand your own science? If the wavelength is reflected off of the object and leaves behind the absorbed wavelengths, the image should be able to strike our photoreceptors and go to our brain for interpretation whether the object is present or not. But this never happens. Show me one instance where this happens, and I'll think twice. I'm talking about objects right now, not light, which will confuse everyone.
Your hopeless word salad aside, afferent vision states that light (photons that all have a characteristic wavelength) is reflected from an object and travels to the eye or camera and continues to travel even if the object disapears. So if the distance is great enough the eye can still see the image of the object after the object is no longer there. Anything else that you say about afferent vision is probably not true and is a serious misunderstanding, or a deliberate misrepresentation of afferent vision for the sole purpose of setting up a strawman to knock down. Your ignorance, whether willful or otherwise, is painfully obvious to anyone reading this thread. What else is obvious is that you have no understanding of any, science real or fictional.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
LadyShea (01-16-2012)
 
Page generated in 0.25699 seconds with 10 queries