Quote:
|
You haven't even understood why, in the efferent model, we can see an object no matter how far away it is as long as it is within visual range and there is light surrounding the object. Before you reject his claim you need to understand it or you won't acknowledge its plausibility.
|
Quote:
|
No one has yet grasped why light does not have to travel 93 million miles for us to see an object that is 93 million miles away,
|
You haven't been able to explain how efferent
vision can cause
a photon to be absorbed by camera film when the photon is located at the Sun, 93 millions miles away from the camera film.
You keep answering questions about physical interactions between light and matter (film or plant leaves) with stuff about seeing and brains. That's not answering the questions.
Efferent vision isn't plausible at all unless it can explain empirical observations.