Quote:
Originally Posted by But
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
What are you getting at?
|
I am getting at images created from only light and photosensitive materials, no lenses needed to create the image on the wall. You claimed the lens was a necessary factor in getting an image on film, I am showing that you can create images without lenses at any children's museum |
That, to me, would be similar to a mirror image on water. There is no lens involved, but I don't think you can get a still photograph without some form of lens.
Picture This – Mountain Mirror Image – Sawatch Range, Colorado |
I just gave you a counterexample. A hologram is a still photograph (on steroids), you get stunning pictures, and there is no lens involved at all. |
You're missing the point. In order to see a hologram you need the lens of your eye. In order to take a picture of a hologram, you need the lens of a camera. Everything that is seen requires a lens, unless it's a lower organism that uses light in a different way.