Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Quote:
|
If I observe that apples fall down from trees, and I want to explain this observation to you, who has not observed this because you don't live near any trees, all I'm doing is describing what I see. What am I presupposing here?
|
How did he see the workings of human conscience in an environment that has never existed the same way one can see an apple falling off a tree?
Are you really that deluded to think these are at all comparable? |
Of course they're comparable. He made an observation just like apples falling down from trees (although it was not as easily seen) and, as such, he was describing what he saw. There were absolutely no presuppositions. He used the word "presupposition" in his own book. I think he knew what the word meant. |
Are you serious? It cannot be directly observed, as an apple falling to the ground can be directly observed, because the no blame environment does not exist and has never existed. How could he possible be describing what he saw? The only way to see something that has not existed and does not exist is in one's imagination.
Stop drinking. |
He was describing how conscience works IN A FREE WILL ENVIRONMENT LADYSHEA. You are on probation for that last comment. I'm tired of your little digs. And believe me, I don't care whether we talk again or not. |
What are you talking about? You just moved the goal posts weasel.
"Conscience won't allow us to..." is clearly a future prediction of how conscience will work in the no blame environment.